I would be interested to know how you keep it with the cleaning of the sensor. Or is dust on the sensor in typical video applications do not matter?
Antwort von Pianist:
"Blowup" wrote:
I would be interested to know how you keep it with the cleaning of the sensor. Or is dust on the sensor in typical video applications do not matter?
For what type of camera you ask? Before the sensor is sitting normally the filter, so you have to consider when changing lenses if all that is on the just swung filter dust grains. But when you change the lens ever? Only WDR I've ever seen that in operation have set up a wide-angle lens. Others may change depending on the job "at home" in the technology stock. Or not, if, like me, has only a camera and a lens.
In the field of digital SLRs that will surely occur more frequently, and then the people have to pay attention to dust as well as in photography. Did not some of these devices have a cleaning mechanism?
Matthias
Antwort von Tuffy:
When changing lenses have to watch out just how and what you're doing (and where!). With DSLRs, it is just often that you change the; for example, I turn only to prime, so is often changed.
Dust etc is already a problem! If the sensor (visible in photos) is dirty, I would have cleaned the camera now. Or if one is sent or risk seekers make itself synonymous (sets it can get photographic stores, etc).
Antwort von MarioX:
The Reinigunsmechanismus in DSLRs is very different. My old Canon model I could easily cleaned with isopropyl alcohol and cotton swab. My Pentax is coated so that this method is impossible here, one would need a SpeckGrabber if a suitable blower is not sufficient. The video would have greatly reduced but already thick dust grains are present, so that they see on the footage.
Antwort von blowup:
Sorry. Forgot to say that I was referring to DSLRs. The purge seems really to be a complex and controversial topic. If you ask 10 people, you get 11 different answers. And the removal synonymous seems to be no perfect solution. Jedenfgalls there is synonymous many negative experiences.
There are lots of kits and tools for and about all you can find positive and critical experience. Where is the case of the Canon 550D so not really cleaned the sensor but the filter before it.
The function of the automatic sensor cleaning seems more like a kind of marketing gimmick to be. Does not much there.
Antwort von Natevi:
Can there to help present what, am currently in Vietnam, had mold on the sensor, here moldy in the humidity just did everything, and it then because isopropyl alcohol is unlikely expensive here, the professional service is pretty far away, fall back on methanol, because it was recommended in some forums. The fact is that replacing the stuff coating the glass plate. Fortunately, Nikon repaired in this country so that only the disk is replaced, Costs 96 USD. Because I could have bought synonymous isopropyl alcohol. So fingers interactions of methanol!
Antwort von MarioX:
Methanol alone is already very toxic in contact with skin care so! With the 550 I do not know me from, each sensor is different. The single most effective mechanism is the dust destruction of Olympus.
Antwort von blowup:
Are you sure that it really was pure methanol, what you have you sold there. Or that was the cause? I have researched almost two days now and not a few swear by methanol. The location means seems expensive special cleaning solution Eclipse !" (about 10 ¬ for 60ml) to be composed of 100% high-purity methyl alcohol (methanol). The web is full with people who have made as good experience with.
Antwort von Natevi:
Exactly of this information, I have guided me and therefore fall back on methanol. Purity is 99.5% methanol for analysis, sealed bottle, not here anymore and after all knowledge of the situation here, I've been here for over a year, obviously ok, had after the first attempt s.Reinigungstuch blue color, ie the coating, which confirmed the view with the microscope was over. So far my experience here.
