Is this Canon recorded in a position to anamorphic 16:9? (Of course, without Anamorphic!)
Antwort von Commanderjanke:
The Camera is not included in the position since the 16:9 only 4:3 CCD Camera 's has. But a 16:9 mode, but is not a proper 16:9 but a 4:3 picture that has black bars top and bottom (letterbox).
Greetings from the Commander
Antwort von campool:
Thank you!
Antwort von Marco:
Almost. The XL-1 is the "16:9" Although balkenfrei in the correct pixel aspect ratio on, but with a corresponding loss of quality because s.Chip while only 432 lines are scanned vertically, which are extended further back in the Processing of 576 lines. After applying the 16:9 pixel aspect ratio it becomes again a geometrically correct picture.
Technically, after the fixation with the XL-1 in the 16:9 mode synonymous "real" 16:9 signal on the tape, which can be treated appropriately than 16:9 signal to the cut programs / should. But from "normal" PAL 16:9 format, it is distinguished by the loss of resolution of 144 lines.
One could in principle work equally well in the 4:3-programmed later in the editing mode and a 16:9-making cropping, so you have even more flexibility when preparing the 16:9 screen. There remains the argument of who makes the full picture scaling better - the XL-1 or the editing program.
