I never imagined the konsumer purchased hdv cam of sony and would thus make some recordings for a video installation. I need 3 monitors for the presentation.
Now the question is what monis?
hd readys are real too expensive for me.
A flat tube or tube only tuts synonymous. (I seek the best of the cheap.)
There are 70'', 16:9 +4:3, 100hz for under 300 of jvc, find ich klasse. I expect a decent tone, so good visual /?
or should I just postproduzieren dv? and ne take proper 4:3 tube?
Thank you for your reply
Antwort von Markus:
Hello,
HDV is 16:9, so I would take wide-screen television. Synonymous You could look for the nearby stores and you see different devices on the ground. Maybe there's something to suit you here and might even act out a volume discount if you take no less than three television.
Antwort von beiti:
Quote:
or should I just postproduzieren dv? and ne take proper 4:3 tube?
You can make synonymous DV in 16:9. For 4:3 you'd have to cut away so what, and that would be a shame.
Antwort von Skye:
"Markus" wrote:
Hello,
HDV is 16:9, so I would take wide-screen television. Synonymous You could look for the nearby stores and you see different devices on the ground. Maybe there's something to suit you here and might even act out a volume discount if you take no less than three television.
Hi, But 16:9 is not hd, that is, the higher resolution may not necessarily represent only the broad picture!
volume discount, good suggestion.
bg bamberg
Antwort von Skye:
"beiti" wrote:
Quote:
or should I just postproduzieren dv? and ne take proper 4:3 tube?
You can make synonymous DV in 16:9. For 4:3 you'd have to cut away so what, and that would be a shame.
ok how to do it now: I take out on hd dv 16:9 and 16:9 in the computer go? and 16:9 dv to give the monitor, which is broadband-ne rör?
what has now become with the beautifully sharp images? (ie I have not tried a digital camera is still to come)
bg ruth
Antwort von Markus:
"Ruth" wrote:
I take on hd 16:9 and 16:9 dv go out into the computer? and 16:9 dv to give the monitor, which is broadband-ne rör?
Yes, yes, yes, yes and yes. ;-)
"Ruth" wrote:
what has now become with the beautifully sharp images?
The monitor should start out low but only SD video (Standard Definition playback), right? So, the quality conforms to the "normal TV", not the HD (high definition television).
Antwort von beiti:
Quote:
what has now become with the beautifully sharp images?
That is not so beautiful sharp. : (
I would suggest you go with your cam, an assortment of cables and a few test shots into the shop and try on by, with what and in which output of connection mode (HD or SD) You with these monitors get the best result.
Whether the Television can handle any HD signals of hanging from its terminal facilities. There are monitors that can show true HD via component input, but still have no HD-Ready logo. (The HD-Ready logo is not necessarily a prerequisite for HD playback their own recordings.) If the television does not have component input, you can probably only SD-feeding signals.
Should it appear that the can of you favorite monitors anyway only accept SD signals, you just conveniently postprocess in DV. If the monitor can show HD directly, you can decide whether the quality gain is visible and the extra effort is worth an HDV editing.
PS: I just saw that you spoke of monitors for under $ 300. Then we can probably rule out high-definition capability at 99%.
Antwort von Markus:
"beiti" wrote:
If the monitor can show HD directly, you can decide whether the quality gain is visible and the extra effort is worth an HDV editing.
... but the subsequent viewer of your images direct Comparison of SD and HD has not. ;-)
Antwort von beiti:
Quote:
... but the subsequent viewer of your images direct Comparison of SD and HD has not.
... and depending on the viewing distance may have no chance to see the difference. The speech was the beginning of 70-inch CRT (70 ") was probably a typo. That SD is usually enough.
