Frage von Catalyst:
hello, I need a very tiny Kaufberatung the lowest segment:
and although I am looking for a camcorder to record on mini dv .....
Criteria:
not more than 200 ¬
relatively good! building in the night / in low light
cheap replacement battery's
possibly direct connection s.den pc via firewire
now, why so cheap?
simply
I am a young man with 20 years of the wild drive to hold festivals and so I want the beautiful moments can keep for later
and because with festivals of wild hergeht and often somewhat frivolous things are dealt with, I will not later ¬ 600 camcorder nachtrauern.
Antwort von Markus73:
Criteria:
not more than 200 ¬
relatively good! building in the night / in low light
Very briefly: Forget it. Either or ...
Gruß,
Markus
Antwort von Catalyst:
I said relatively! between one or the other manufacturers will certainly vary!
that I have no less than 200 ¬ hd bild expect me synonymous is clearly
Antwort von Markus73:
I said relatively! between one or the other manufacturers will certainly vary!
that I have no less than 200 ¬ hd bild expect me synonymous is clearly Ok, but to provide you with a brief overview of the conditions to give: in this price class is the Picture of the best equipment in good light so that the original recordings can be heartless when quality is not spoiled.
In bad light (and that means not "twilight / darkness," but begins with "Interior Lighting" in) the quality is so dramatic effect that the outcome in short just about good enough for a ton, because you need not be synonymous much more comparable.
If your budget is limited, then get yourself some small Panasonic, Canon or Sony (in that order, my opinion) and assume that they produce nothing more charming when the sun is.
You move here you alleruntersten in the price range, the camcorder can have a performance and ask the most expensive of these devices only as reasonably can.
Regards,
Markus
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... that I have no less than 200 ¬ hd bild expect me synonymous is clearly ... That is good, but you must in this class, unfortunately, not even a good SD Picture expect as soon as the light intensity to the level of room lighting or even worse today. Across the recommended brands, Canon, Panasonic, JVC Sonyand because there's no such world-differences - all save s.gleichen and for all end the same physical laws. True remedy because only one additional light in the recording. You can get to yes www.videoaktiv.de times the test pictures of each cameras view to an idea like this to get what is expected.
But you must at least be your criterion of "Firewire port" not to worry: The long ago have all MiniDV camcorder.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von C.I.W:
200 ¬ means:
Chip no larger than 1 / 6 "
Lens no larger than 37mm
What worse for night shots, there is not really, except perhaps a mobile phone.
Antwort von Franz Peter:
I had a pig is still expensive jvc mini dv camcorder of my old mr times just once has cost 2000 ¬ .... is better than a cheap model of today?
These are the JVC GR-DVX ..... and so it looks like it only has 100X digital zoom so no optical ......
Antwort von Franz Peter:
I meant of course ...... DM
and no my budget is not so beschrängt but I have called the basic why .....
Antwort von Bernd E.:
jvc mini dv ... ... ... 2000 ... once tasted ... better than a cheap model of today? ... GR-DVX ... Generally I trust an older camcorder (that of before the "greed-is-cool" time) to more than one Billigstmodell today, but this case is probably the exception. The GR-DVX-series (there were about ten different with each other a number behind the "X"), I recall, from very small camcorders, the construction, also have small CCDs. In Lowlight area, they are hardly better than a new device you of the targeted class. But if you have the JVC already, you can quite easily test how the pictures turn out.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Franz Peter:
As already said, for this price you get really decent NIX.
I would like angedeuted me after gebracuhten devices around.
And if you still have a new ¬ 200 Camocrder want, I recommend the following:
Panasonic NV-GS60
SonyDCR-HC51 (53)
Canon MD215 (130)
Antwort von Markus:
I find it a pity that the questions on the cheapest camcorders with the (relatively) best pictures ever reappear, but the questioner then never give feedback, whether it is so (bad) had. - Others, before such a decision stand, this would certainly help.
Antwort von Jan:
Markus, the users have here just like me in the shop mercilessly exaggerated performances. I can still well s.meine Education (1993) remember - s.einige VHS-C and 8 mm cameras for good DM 1000, in part, without stabilizer and with mono sound.
Now there are cameras like the Panasonic GS 80 with optical stabilizer & PCM digital stereo sound - not even the half (partially almost 1 / 4 - as JVC shows) of the 1000 DM costs .....
The sleep quality of light of the cameras almost always appreciates any user incorrectly that why many pros use a light - clasp eh not the amateurs.
There are no extreme differences between ¬ 200 cameras, the advantages and disadvantages of the models have already been explained umpteen times.
Panasonic GS 60.80 & 90, Canon 110 & MD 215, JVC GR 725 & 825 and SonyHC 27, 37 and the new 51st
Panasonic hatt zb often the best picture and best stability, Sonyist the night program in motion a little better, Canon has a microphone input for better sound.
VG
Jan
