Infoseite // 1 CCD and 3 CCD



Frage von Rolf Simon:


Hello,
Let me first Kuz imagine. My name is Rolf Simon, I'm 47 years old, and my hobby is flying of large model helicopters.
So I would need a committee of experts. I would like to see a digital growth, mainly to my model helicopter in flight on film. I have already spent hours in the networks to give me an overview of the Giant offers.
But first I need some info again, to something closer to restrict choice.

Now out my questions:
1.
Since the flight models be synonymous something next, and fly higher, of course, would be a great advantage of zooming. Now I have heard that one with a zoom at max. 10x-15x should be restricted, as well as the image quality suffers imenz, shake and become too large. What do you this?

2.
How big is the qualitative difference between 1 - CCD and 3 - CCD devices? Worthwhile in my case a 3 - CCD device, or you notice the "little"?

I have already 2 in the narrower choice.

1. A PANASONIC NV-GS 230 (3CCD / 10x Zoom)
2. A JVC GRD-825 (1CCD / 35x Zoom)

The price limit should be max. 250 ¬ - 300 ¬.

What the experts think about this .... what alternatives there are out of your sight yet?

Schon mal vielen Dank ....

Space


Antwort von Crookie:

The Panasonic is the better picture you provide. I've synonymous one from the series NVGS and am / was happy with it.

Space


Antwort von Rolf Simon:

Hello,
because I do my model helicopter (-> 2m) in the film wants to fly, would be a big Zoobereich already not bad.
A Pana NV-GS 90, for example, has an optical zoom of 42X, in conjunction with an opt. Image Stabilization, which is certainly better than an electronic. Stability is?

Can I now assume that I then synonymous rel. verwacklungsfreie get pictures?

Or should I use a 3 - CCD Cam prefer the zoom range?

Space


Antwort von Markus73:

"Rolf Simon" wrote: A Pana NV-GS 90, for example, has an optical zoom of 42X, in conjunction with an opt. Image Stabilization, which is certainly better than an electronic. Stability is?

Can I now assume that I then synonymous rel. verwacklungsfreie get pictures?

No, not under warranty. It is at a 10-fold zoom already practically impossible without a tripod to get pictures verwacklungsfreie, synonymous with stability.

Quote: Or should I use a 3 - CCD Cam prefer the zoom range?
Yes, definitely. A big zoom range is mainly used to "capture" Ignorance of potential customers, similar to the information in megapixel digicams.

Regards,
Markus

Space


Antwort von Rolf Simon:

Hi Markus,
OK ... then I know at least sometimes in what direction I must orientiren ... namely in the direction 3 - CCD.

But as synonymous, there is a wide variety ... on what to do because the light of my intended Budge's of max. 250 ¬ - 300 ¬ do?

Space


Antwort von Markus73:

Put a little thing and take what the Panasonic GS330, which is THE all-rounder, with which you are not a lot can go wrong. The GS230 was sometimes controversial, there are probably a number of quality problems, what the picture is concerned.

Regards,
Markus

Space


Antwort von Rolf Simon:

Hello,
it cost around 350 ¬ ... is more than I originally wanted to spend, but there will be times superior. 50 ¬ -100 ¬ invest less and then is annoyed synonymous not really great.

Thank you ever ...

Space


Antwort von Rolf Simon:

Hello,
had me a Panasonic NV-GS 330 ordered .... should arrive today. I hope for my purposes, the right in this price class have purchased.

Thank you s.alle!

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash