Infoseite // 150 MiniDV tapes to HDD archive (DV / HDV)



Frage von killerbees19:


Hello again,
I was faced with the following scenario: There are approximately 150 MiniDV cassettes, some DV material (ie, SD) and partial HDV, included with almost all Canon camcorders. This material should be archived most of which (~ 100 tapes in all cases) on a hard drive (RAID 1) to s.ein like to have another backup, b) detail sift the material (with a search index build tags, etc.) and c) they have on the material-click access. The necessary software for a search index, etc. are now views his side issue, that was my smallest problem. I pinch myself to program on the intranet as a web application (Flash Player & Co. for quick preview, etc.) itself :-)

Thus, once the current standard, according to my calculations we would get along with 2x1TB or 2x2TB in a Raid 1 quite well, depending on whether the DV footage immediately synonymous saves as MPEG. I just wonder how it performs s.Besten one Überspielungsaktion. Simply an HDV camcorder (used or new? Buy), with which we transferred all the tapes? Or is it just a "real" MiniDV / HDV drive? And all alone to read and save synonymous with a program could be very stressful, a solution without a running PC would be ideal, but I do not know if there is such a stand-alone solutions in general, and whether that is affordable for individuals. Or are there special Programs that after you put a tape in a connected Cam / Drive is rewinding auto and dub? So a batch "Lite"? Or perhaps there is still other solutions? ;-)

So now my question: What would you recommend? How can I get the cassette half without too much effort on hard drive without spending an unnecessary amount of money? I am looking forward to your suggestions :-)


MfG Christian

Space


Antwort von tommyb:

I tell you a dub with a capture bitch.

I do not know a jukebox-like DV (drive, but there is a DVD drive for the 5.25 "bay), so that you capture so there is nothing else than the tapes to manual.

However, you could shorten the time to half, if you should have two capture camcorder'd Calculator, and two (or one with a fast hard drive and multiple, individually addressable Firewire inputs -> then the sluts but his capture of different types!).

A direct conversion to MPEG2, I would not recommend it. Firstly, you need to cut of MPEG2 resources of more than DV, the other would be the quality that you would get if you LIVE not encode as much as if it were compressed with the best settings.

Note synonymous, that is already synonymous HDV MPEG2. A Neucodieren would bring you perhaps a reduction in size by 30% () for similar quality.

Space


Antwort von Alf_300:

@ possible without spending much money ...
I guess with 600 euros and 1 monster time you're here.
Since it is better to do you do it only when necessary and lsgerst your cartridges Odent

Space


Antwort von killerbees19:

"TommyB" wrote: However, you could shorten the time to half, if you should have two capture camcorder'd Calculator, and two (or one with a fast hard drive and multiple, individually addressable Firewire inputs -> then the sluts but his capture of different types!).
I think that will slightly exceed my budget :-)

"TommyB" wrote: A direct conversion to MPEG2, I would not recommend it. Firstly, you need to cut of MPEG2 resources of more than DV, the other would be the quality that you would get if you LIVE not encode as much as if it were compressed with the best settings.
I thought to myself, just because HDV is already MPEG2, the difference would be for me then no longer so extreme. If the MPEG2 conversion of SD material, however, is not really recommended, then I prefer to leave it. In the few GB more or less synonymous kommts me any more. Because the quality was not noticeably differ from the original SD material I used otherwise lack a sufficiently fast Calculator synonymous always stored as DV-AVI.

"TommyB" wrote: Note synonymous, that is already synonymous HDV MPEG2. A Neucodieren would bring you perhaps a reduction in size by 30% () for similar quality.
MPEG encode again? Hmmm, so I've been doing really rather bad experiences. Above all I would need to schedule more time.

"Alf_300" wrote: Since it is better to do you do it only when necessary and lsgerst your cartridges Odent
Only then begins in the worst case back to the Herumgespule in> 5 cartridges just because one is looking for a specific recording / scene, one would like to use again ;-)

Thanks for your answers in any case!


MfG Christian

Space


Antwort von tommyb:

Just to express the views more accurately
You may very well into MPEG2 archiving, only you should in any case, DIRECTLY TO THE CAPTURE convert to MPEG2. Some Programs can, but to the detriment of the motion search, etc.

Creating good encoder to a dual-core is not synonymous half times more than the real-time, but what comes out is top!

Space


Antwort von killerbees19:

TommyB Thank you, that sheds some light on the matter! :-)


MfG Christian

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash