Infoseite // 1CCD with 3CCD with 3.3 million pixels, or 3x0, 8 million pixels



Frage von MichaK.:


In the search for a new camcorder, I came across this page. I have already read through several articles. Bin synonymous encountered some comparison photos (vs. 1CCD. 3CCD) Since the benefits are clearly on the table. My question is:
If a 1CCD camcorder with 3.3 million pixels of the color stability better than a 3CCD camcorder with 3x0, 8 million pixels?
I have always been disturbed verblasten colors during the final film on DVD. However, I have as yet worked with a camera with 0.8 million pixels (1CCD).
Gruß Micha

Space


Antwort von AndyZZ:

Purely mathematically you need for a color picture PAL 720x576 px = 414,720 pixels. Most cameras have CCD with at least 800,000 pixels (reserve for electronic image stabilization, etc.)

1CCD with 3.3 million pixels: The extra pixels are used for the built-in photo function. Then corresponds roughly a 3.3 megapixel digital camera. Only the pictures are never as good as with a real digital camera.

3CCD with 0.8 million pixels: This camcorder has to offer no significant Photosmart function. But he probably has a very sharp and true color picture.

Conclusion: If you have a choice and you do not want to burden when taking pictures during the movie, select all cases the 3-Chipper.
You can still blow up this issue now to infinity, by now leads the size of the CCD, the depth of field etc etc etc.
But since it is always expected to act in consumer cameras, we have the issue covered the lower table.

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash