Frage von MacSeller:
objectively what is suitable with the Canon 5D Mark II, for video recordings
20mm, 24mm, 28mm, 35mm, 50mm, 85mm and ...
With a 35mm objective but one gets the film look great, right?
better with small aperture and large aperture?
how objectively you can recommend to me, it should be of canon.
I am grateful for each recommendation
MacSeller
Antwort von KrischanDO:
Moin,
Take the '85 and Aperture 2.8.
Regards
CS
Antwort von alibaba:
s.sein wenns of canon with should be the obvious answer, since you can either take the range of the most expensive L lenses, or the 2nd class.
Generally speaking, I'd advise you exactly which of your desired focal length when Nikon AIS. because you'll get some good lenses for the money.
If money does not matter, I'd take the 35mm 1.4 and 1.2, the 85er
Antwort von MacSeller:
Moin,
Take the '85 and Aperture 2.8.
Regards
CS you get better with the 35 mm film look? than with the 85er?
Antwort von KrischanDO:
Depending on the Burn next, the filmer of the look.
Antwort von Zizi:
you get better with the 35 mm film look? than with the 85er? I check they do not ask?
What would be the better Filmmlook?
When you think dan is less depth of field, the 85mm 1.2 even at open aperture s.einer 5D a monster and one of the best portrait lens!
Want to look good film in my opinion sufficient s.der 5D Focal each having 2.8 and 200mm!
L lenses are a waste of money ..
Da gibts have few really better illustration of how much cheaper 3rd Manufacturer or cheaper Canon models (50mm 1.8 ZBS.)
Antwort von masterseb:
the smallest possible cut dazzle and good. This is film look.
focal length is pretty no preference. depends, what will you have a perspective. I would take a 28mm or 35mm and a 50mm. the lower the dazzle, the more tiefenunschärfe. The optics are canon but not necessarily the best choice. whose processing is not so great. schau mal ins cinema5d.com forum.
Antwort von MacSeller:
you get better with the 35 mm film look? than with the 85er?
I check they do not ask?
What would be the better Filmmlook? from slashcam news:
Suppose you want a classic film on 50mm, aperture Normaloptik operate s.der Canon EOS 7D. Including the focal length extension so you end up with an approximately 30mm full-frame Optics.
And my question is, I would like a traditional 50mm look s.meiner 5D
I was as synonymous to use a 30mm Optics?
Antwort von masterseb:
no. 5D is full frame, 7D crop. therefore, all 35mm detailsfull agree with the 5D, 7D at the 60% to come.
Antwort von MacSeller:
therefore, all 35mm detailsfull agree with the 5D, 7D at the 60% to come. So when I called it a classic 50mm look s.meiner 5D
I was as synonymous to use a 50mm Optics?
mfg
Antwort von KrischanDO:
One way to find the right focal perhaps would be to face with the camera s.den desired space to create the front of the camera to what is at stake, and then look through the camera too.
Otherwise, that is quite more of a "What if I do I transport the object A from the point X wants to create a place Y? What A, X and Y are, I do not know really." - Discussion.
Film look is more than just shallow depth.
CS
Antwort von Zizi:
So when I called it a classic 50mm look s.meiner 5D
I was as synonymous to use a 50mm Optics?
mfg At Arris is considered normal focal generally uses a 30 or 35mm!
ie. that you have to take one for the 5D, at the same 50mm as the normal focal Full Resolution Sample get another one!
However, since the film look different from s.einer Arri 35mm.
A full frame photo sensor surface, the film is simply not the classic film look soo can show him how you'd like.
Film look is more light and color balance than the crappy one extreme blur 5D .. Komischwerweise here in the forum never asked about light even though it is important for film look as "light"!
Antwort von MacSeller:
So when I called it a classic 50mm look s.meiner 5D
I was as synonymous to use a 50mm Optics?
mfg
However, since the film look different from s.einer Arri 35mm. that's obvious, Arri, Red, PANAV's a whole other league.
eg the film Lenz - 3Sat few scene with the 5D would be rotated.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Depending on the Burn next, the filmer of the look. Hahaha
..............
On the 5D will get what is s.der Lens.
And 24 mm are better ;-)
On a crop of Canon Camera is expected s.einer Nikon x1.6 and x1.5
then the resulting image scale KB (Small)
24mm x1.6 = 38.5 mm KB Look So (FF (full size) Look)
Speak to achieve a 50 mm look
50/1.6 = 31.25mm (s.einer Crop Camera)
............
Nah 50mm shots
Total 24mm
Detail 85 mm
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstellungsgr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe
There are times all adjustment variables defeniert ""
MfG
B. DeKid
Antwort von MacSeller:
Depending on the Burn next, the filmer of the look.
Hahaha
..............
On the 5D will get what is s.der Lens.
And 24 mm are better ;-)
On a crop of Canon Camera is expected s.einer Nikon x1.6 and x1.5
then the resulting image scale KB (Small)
24mm x1.6 = 38.5 mm KB Look So (FF (full size) Look)
Speak to achieve a 50 mm look
50/1.6 = 31.25mm (s.einer Crop Camera)
............
Nah 50mm shots
Total 24mm
Detail 85 mm
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstellungsgr%C3%B6%C3%9Fe
There are times all adjustment variables defeniert ""
MfG
B. DeKid na finally the right time can tell, I've seen (on the 5D what is s.der Lens.) I think I need to get as synonymous with 7D x1.6.
, thank B. DeKid
Antwort von B.DeKid:
No. You do not need a FF Digital Cam any crop - crop is produced only when the chip size is smaller or larger than that of a "slide / negative" film thus briefly mentioned - KB.
Therefore with Lens Tests like the KB used as a reference and we will write
"The XYZ 100mm lens with a look consistent with a 160 mm lens * s.KB
As stated in the rule, according to the Manufacturer x1.5 or x1.6 - only medium format is expected to date with x0.8 (for example) - we'll see how converts the RED for EPICS and partly because their chips are already very large.
MfG
B. DeKid
PS I love 24 mm look - this is nen vernümpftiges seeing - and I would call a true "film look".
Mal hold your thumb in his eye - then look at / you fokusierst fingernail - and then look over time beyond the thumb and look at the room.
Since then very quickly realized how much Bokeh one really uses every day ;-)
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh
It's all a matter of distance to the object and the aperture opening.
Antwort von alwin:
Nah 50mm shots
Total 24mm
Detail 85 mm
35mm medium shot lolz
Antwort von B.DeKid:
24 50 85 jo ok but keep the optics MustHave
16 35 100 150 300 then come synonymous moreover
or all nonsense - we must all have between 10 - 1000 ;-)) quasi garkeine path leads off past for "film look ";-))
Antwort von Chezus:
brrrr ... always makes the hairs on me when I hear film look in a sentence with a particular technique. More recently (ie since VDSLR) it is the depth of field. Prior threw "only" 25p/24p and Color correction
Remember when your lens: the longer the focal more striking is the rolling shutter to get used.
for the beginning of what wide (24 or 35mm) and in EVERY case, a 50mm 1.4 or even 1.2
And think synonymous: the Aperture opens next focus will be more difficult. Wow, check out someone to shoot at 1.2 aperture which is naturally moved (just as a man nunmal stop moving). 60-80% will be blurred, synonymous to what it should be sharp!
Very difficult to keep focus on most important.
Aperture 2.8 is there even easier.
For all static 1.2 is quite nice, but often simply makes no sense.
Is often easy to over -
