Frage von luftikus143:
Hello,
So after I already discussions for weeks gleanings (and synonymous here already have triggered), I probably but - because of the bad sound - on a Canon HV 30 decided. I will not hold additional Micro rumschleppen and always have it.
In the same price category, there's things in SD card so probably the HF 100, and then sure of what Sonyund Panasonic.
Can you recommend me something?
Merci a lot!
Antwort von Bruno Peter:
Want to cut something with bad option?
Antwort von edgar:
Want to cut something with bad option? Quite so drastically, I would now not express ...
I myself own a Pana-AVCCAM (HMC151) and cut my clips natively with Premiere CS4.
With a quick calculator today no longer a problem.
Gruß Edgar
Antwort von kalle70:
ch me well enough - because of the bad sound - on a Canon HV 30 decided. I will not hold additional Micro rumschleppen and always have it.
In the same price category, there's things in SD card so probably the HF 100, and then sure of what Sonyund Panasonic.
Merci a lot! How do you pointed that an SD card to the internal sound of a camera could improve?
The internal mic of a camcorder to a ext. Mic ALWAYS been unsuccessful.
One ext. I can decouple the respective application adapt.
No engine noise, such as zoom, tape or Bedienungsgefummel.
Similarly, with the of the Weitwinkligkeit camcorder-Lenses, there are virtually no consumer camcorder with wide enough, so you need a wide-mandatory intent.
Antwort von shipoffools:
...
How do you pointed that an SD card to the internal sound of a camera could improve ??... If he as a hobby and leave no film is continuously camcorder with an external Micro rumschleppen wants, he goes with an SD card device significantly better than with a tape device. And the direct comparison in terms of internal micro between HV30 and HF100 is serious. In the HV30, you have the constant hum of the tape drive with the images, even in noisier environment, it is still clearly perceptible. The only remedy: internal damping, the sound is muffled but synonymous. The HF 100 do you think this problem does not ever, because it works silently, unless you are a "permanent Zoomer."
...
The internal mic of a camcorder to a ext. Mic ALWAYS been unsuccessful.
One ext. I can decouple the respective application adapt.
No engine noise, such as zoom, tape or Bedienungsgefummel ....
Agrees in principle already, but with a (good) external microphone directly to the HV30, you have the same problem. As much as you can not decouple that the drive with no sound is recorded. While it is significantly weaker, but remains on the recordings to hear if you are not just sitting on his ears ... (Tested with Sennheiser ME66 and Beyerdynamic MCE72)
The only way really "clean" sound with the HV30 to get is the Micro significantly away from your camcorder to get, and for that you need a second person, but for a hobby filmmakers (amateur ... or see other discussion ... ) is a mostly too great effort, if not exactly scenic filming. The HF100, you can do that directly on external micro device's plug and still have a pretty good sound (- of the major forced removal of the sound source and the mediocre preamp apart, but it's synonymous with the HV30 is not better.) The only disadvantage here is the mini accessory shoe of the HF100. Can you solve but by looking at the micro-holder for a standard accessory shoe on the right zurechtfeilt size.
Greeting
shipoffools
Antwort von kalle70:
At least one of the safest on the good sound bethinks!
Makes me wonder just that with you as a consumer Cam is happy to be like.
Apparently you're blind, but hear the grass grow ;-)
That was not meant ironically! It really amazes me!
