Avid Liquid 7 Reviewof thomas - 20 Dec 2005 01:10:00 A somewhat disappointed review of the new version of Pinnacle Liquid, which now trades under the Purchase of Pinnacle by Avid as an Avid Liquid 7th The Conclusion: Current good features justify the outdated stuck with one interface, and enough new features to the update to version 7.0 at this price too. Moreover, doubt Charlie White of the fact that Avid Liquid is further developed next, as has s.Start with Avid Xpress already a program in this price range.
Antwort von staeff:
It is clear that liquid can not get a better interface than Xpress. Really a pity that some leaders find it always so difficult to design the UI betriebssystemnäher and beginner-friendly. If I could only think s.Quark - awful. Certainly nothing to say about the performance, but at least for me - a lot about the fun factor.
Antwort von Streifenschneider:
Well understood, correctly, I have not the deal with Pinnacle before - what's the deal of Avid really what they had with Xpress Pro does not have (all right, less of a competitor)?.
I just hope that some features of Liquid synonymous its way into Xpress Pro are available - Timewarp effects with Bezier curves, I sorely miss.
Greeting January
Antwort von Gavin:
Yikes, the liquid surface has an outdated is surely a joke! The fact that the Americans do with modern interfaces difficult, we know of few other progams still synonymous ... :-) This comment is heard only synonymous of users, the program is (still) can not serve. All who have worked themselves to appreciate it, because you (so synonymous if no real-time functions would be included) simply can cut faster than with other programs. I also know of many users who, after comparing them have switched of AVID or Premiere to Liquid systems are, but not one of the liquid would be switched to something else ...
Antwort von lauviss:
I can not understand synonymous. I used to work with Adobe Premiere. I then switched to Liquid Edition, and the program wants to miss it anymore. Of course, the surface looks different from many other Windows-Programs (well, s.der version 6.0 has "unfortunately" did) something, but that is synonymous s.der functionality: a NLE program must meet criteria other than a word processor. You can not squeeze any function under a "standard design".
A hammer does not even synonymous like a drill.
In this sense, "Bye bye!" lauviss
Antwort von videomachinist:
without lapsing into unnecessary nostalgia to want: FAST one of the first company that was outside of Avid NLE and Media100 made available at affordable prices. Of the part of the UI unfortunately I have not as yet found me pleasing alternative when it comes to pure editing, there is nothing comparable to good IMHO. I am convinced that with avid pinnacles Aquise operated only know-how transfer and containment competitor has (at least in europe the most liquid platform mean trouble ...), I was looking forward to the new intel macs (finally comparable performance .. .) and the open and user friendly format Final Cut Pro HD 2.0 ... is an avid platzhirsch the hopefully soon nen Fangschuß get set ...
Antwort von streifenschneider:
"videomachinist" wrote:
I am convinced that with avid pinnacles Aquise operated only know-how transfer and containment competitor has (at least in europe the most liquid platform mean trouble ...), I was looking forward to the new intel macs (finally comparable performance .. .) and the open and user friendly format Final Cut Pro HD 2.0 ... is an avid platzhirsch the hopefully soon nen Fangschuß get set ...
2.0? I thought they were already in version 5 ;-). If the Intel Macs, however, be affordable, that would be really an alternative, only until Powermac based on Intel's still lasts until the end of next year and with the initial emulation (Rosetta), I am synonymous pretty skeptical about whether all this can be so rosy is (Apple is good at promises, but what it really is good remains to be seen).
Greeting jan
Antwort von stacoja:
With the takeover of the avid pinnacle wanted to incorporate the server system. The broadcast sector is more important than any average system. Unity was never so right. And lo and behold, the server system will not be supported in future. stacoja
Antwort von MiXMaster:
Is already irritating, when software gets a bad rating in version 7, and has called version 6, yet the same author as "Pinnacle's Liquid Edition is another step toward editing nirvana" ... and on the stale User Interface in Liquid 6 "a better user interface , make this a significantly improved nonlinear editing package. " was written.
You can make a software really so much "get worse"?
