Frage von deepbluetube:
I am unsure what my HV10 Wide Anglefür view. I film under water and had furchbare experience with the supposedly great and so expensive Inon Wide Anglefür the underwater housing: Unsharp s.Rand, vignetting, disaster. I will now shift to a Wide Angle Direct s.Camcorders change.
Had only the Raynox HD-5050PRO in the eye, but there are some opinions that would only Raynox converter with HV10 correctly to fit and would Vignetti synonymous.
In the forum here I have found only one post in which someone cheap Hama praises.
I gladly pay a little more, but I want a good wide Anglemit lower edge blur and without black edges. Can anyone really safe for the HV10 recommend?
Thanks a lot!
Greg
Antwort von aaa:
Raynox hd 6600 pro 52mm (with adapter to 43) is definitely the best with his good price and a subsequent minimalbrenntweite of 28mm (42.5 x 0.66)
Antwort von deepbluetube:
Raynox hd 6600 pro 52mm (with adapter to 43) is definitely the best with his good price and a subsequent minimalbrenntweite of 28mm (42.5 x 0.66) Is this a practical experience with HV10? She has a 37 mm thread, why should I be a 52 mm lens with 43 mm adapter take? But that is not the 5050 better than the 6600 Lens for the HV10?
Greetings and thanks Greg
Antwort von aaa:
sorry, I thought the HV10 would hv20/30 as similar as the latter two. I can only say that the said weitwinkel for 20/30 very very good.
Antwort von Musashi:
I once read somewhere that the Raynox HD-6600 per 52 synonymous for the HV10 is well placed. One needs only a 43 to 37mm adapter. The vignetting is not as pronounced as in 5050 and shading would have none.
In the original Wide Anglevon Canon (WD-HC37 or something similar) should the results be good. However, it's already a lot more expensive and it has no filter thread synonymous.
Antwort von deepbluetube:
I once read somewhere that the Raynox HD-6600 per 52 synonymous for the HV10 is well placed. One needs only a 43 to 37mm adapter. The vignetting is not as pronounced as in 5050 and shading would have none.
In the original Wide Anglevon Canon (WD-HC37 or something similar) should the results be good. However, it's already a lot more expensive and it has no filter thread synonymous. Danke erstmal s.beide above.
If it's just somebody knew exactly ....
I have read that 5050 would not have any vignetting in the HV10, no shading, light edge blur and a bit barrel. I have read that 5050 would be better for the HV10 as the 6600th
Whether the Canon is good, I do not know, I know it likes, and even then would pay the price.
If it's just somebody knew exactly ....
Antwort von Musashi:
At best, you call out the team at Hapa. That is the dealer for Raynox products in Germany. When you can not buy as a private person, you can but the retailer near you call (I have made synonymous times). There would be times I will go and ask if you both with your Cam Converter can try.
http://www.hapa-team.de/index.php?PHPSESSID=895a82ebf2372372b69e1c81fd58139e
Otherwise you could both at Amazon and the worst within 14 days of sending back. The shipping but then you have to bear.
Antwort von deepbluetube:
Two very helpful suggestions! thx!
Antwort von Don-CB:
The Hama Lens with which I was - synonymous when your demand for a long time ago. The Hama is great - I've tried umpteen Lenses. No black corners, no gross distortion and almost no visible edge blurring - so good, that I never Lens arrangements. All for under 100 ¬ is very decent. Especially since the camera is barely larger synonymous because the relatively small Hama is built. A top investment probiers from.
Antwort von ed-media:
I had s.der HV10 a wide Anglevon my Digital8 in use, only a slight edge blur, but the fall in general only rarely and only on good HDTVs, normally, via beamer etc. top of it.
