I am unsure what my HV10 Wide Anglefür view. I film under water and had furchbare experience with the supposedly great and so expensive Inon Wide Anglefür the underwater housing: Unsharp s.Rand, vignetting, disaster. I will now shift to a Wide Angle Direct s.Camcorders change.
Had only the Raynox HD-5050PRO in the eye, but there are some opinions that would only Raynox converter with HV10 correctly to fit and would Vignetti synonymous.
In the forum here I have found only one post in which someone cheap Hama praises.
I gladly pay a little more, but I want a good wide Anglemit lower edge blur and without black edges. Can anyone really safe for the HV10 recommend?
Thanks a lot!
Greg
Antwort von aaa:
Raynox hd 6600 pro 52mm (with adapter to 43) is definitely the best with his good price and a subsequent minimalbrenntweite of 28mm (42.5 x 0.66)
Antwort von deepbluetube:
"aaa" wrote:
Raynox hd 6600 pro 52mm (with adapter to 43) is definitely the best with his good price and a subsequent minimalbrenntweite of 28mm (42.5 x 0.66)
Is this a practical experience with HV10? She has a 37 mm thread, why should I be a 52 mm lens with 43 mm adapter take? But that is not the 5050 better than the 6600 Lens for the HV10? Greetings and thanks Greg
Antwort von aaa:
sorry, I thought the HV10 would hv20/30 as similar as the latter two. I can only say that the said weitwinkel for 20/30 very very good.
Antwort von Musashi:
I once read somewhere that the Raynox HD-6600 per 52 synonymous for the HV10 is well placed. One needs only a 43 to 37mm adapter. The vignetting is not as pronounced as in 5050 and shading would have none.
In the original Wide Anglevon Canon (WD-HC37 or something similar) should the results be good. However, it's already a lot more expensive and it has no filter thread synonymous.
Antwort von deepbluetube:
"Musashi" wrote:
I once read somewhere that the Raynox HD-6600 per 52 synonymous for the HV10 is well placed. One needs only a 43 to 37mm adapter. The vignetting is not as pronounced as in 5050 and shading would have none.
In the original Wide Anglevon Canon (WD-HC37 or something similar) should the results be good. However, it's already a lot more expensive and it has no filter thread synonymous.
Danke erstmal s.beide above.
If it's just somebody knew exactly ....
I have read that 5050 would not have any vignetting in the HV10, no shading, light edge blur and a bit barrel. I have read that 5050 would be better for the HV10 as the 6600th
Whether the Canon is good, I do not know, I know it likes, and even then would pay the price.
If it's just somebody knew exactly ....
Antwort von Musashi:
At best, you call out the team at Hapa. That is the dealer for Raynox products in Germany. When you can not buy as a private person, you can but the retailer near you call (I have made synonymous times). There would be times I will go and ask if you both with your Cam Converter can try.
Otherwise you could both at Amazon and the worst within 14 days of sending back. The shipping but then you have to bear.
Antwort von deepbluetube:
Two very helpful suggestions! thx!
Antwort von Don-CB:
The Hama Lens with which I was - synonymous when your demand for a long time ago. The Hama is great - I've tried umpteen Lenses. No black corners, no gross distortion and almost no visible edge blurring - so good, that I never Lens arrangements. All for under 100 ¬ is very decent. Especially since the camera is barely larger synonymous because the relatively small Hama is built. A top investment probiers from.
Antwort von ed-media:
I had s.der HV10 a wide Anglevon my Digital8 in use, only a slight edge blur, but the fall in general only rarely and only on good HDTVs, normally, via beamer etc. top of it.
