Hello together, when I look at only the data sheets of each Medelle look really speaks for all the small camcorders such as the HV10 in contrast to the XM2. Where is the Bildquallität the really better on a conventional television?
Antwort von Markus:
the term image encompasses far more than the mere resolution of a video image. Or are digital photos with 8 megapixels in principle (content, design, lighting ,...) technically better than those with 4 megapixels? ;-)
Antwort von petepopcorn:
Television solves the traditional only in on PAL. What if all you see is the difference between a cheap consumer camera or a 3-Chipper, with a beta-Uralt ensure a better PAL resolution Picture returns as a cheap MiniDV model - of the unspeakable toys with VGA resolution, not to mention. Basically on the thumb, a current HDV camera is certainly a very good PAL-resolution picture can deliver, as apart of the Resolutionauch the other components (Lens) are better. Conclusion: if the images of a XM2 on the conventional television where one of ten times more expensive Camera differ I venture to doubt.