Frage von nordheide:
The Blackmagic Design Hyper Deck indeed has a shuttle \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e HDMI Input and Output \u003cbr /\u003e as well as \u003cbr /\u003e HD SDI Input and Output \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Can be looped into it and with HD-SDI signal to HDMI? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Thus, one could make it one atom at a lower cost to the Ninja Samurai \u003cbr /\u003e and would have even two recording sources and additionally a converter - or not? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Background: I have an EX1 with only one HD SDI and HDMI with XA10 \u003cbr /\u003e and I wanted to buy now or 4:2:2 ProRes with the XA10 not include the Samurai Ninja +.
Antwort von ruessel:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von nordheide:
\u003cdiv class=\
Antwort von Valentino:
In HDMI and HD-SDI out is definitely the hyper-deck shuttle! \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Conversely, I have not tried it yet, but should work synonymous. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Have you ever studied the Instructions? \u003cbr /\u003e Can be found on the Support Page at Black Magic. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e With the EX1 does not tend to the XA10 4:2:2 10bit recording sense. \u003cbr /\u003e With AVCHD camcorders such as the AX10 it is very possible, that is always first converted into AVCHD and then the signal on the HDMI - "inflated" is out. \u003cbr /\u003e Even though this is not the case, it may well be the internal working of the camera Leistungsgruenden only with 4:2:0 signal. \u003cbr /\u003e Without tangible test you will not be able ellen but firmly. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Generally carries about switching devices in a row that is always a lot of problems. \u003cbr
Antwort von nordheide:
\u003cdiv class=\/> \u003cbr /\u003e Generally carries about switching devices in a row that is always a lot of problems. \u003cbr /\u003e In addition I would save the money for a ninja / samurai and buy a couple of SSDs for the hyper-deck. \u003cbr /\u003e ProRes is a great codec, unfortunately there are no decent NLE more for \u003cbr /\u003e which to some extent still is currently. \u003cbr /\u003e Stay there for better Hypdeck and trust in the good "old" DNxHD codec. \u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e The instructions I have not read yet, but I think that this special case \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e EX1 HD SDI to BMD to Ninja Rec \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e is not to be found ;-)) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Without knowing it, of course, one can not say whether the XA10 4:2:2 output on HDMI. But that's why I'm asking. Possibly someone has already tested here in the forum or heard from a reliable source. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Why are there
 |
Antwort von Valentino:
Let me not evil, but after that I could play with a colleague a.einem FCPX system around half a day I share the opinion of many per-user: FCPX is just a better iMovie and no FCP7 to "real" alternative. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Back to your XA10, which will most likely spend a 4:2:2 signal, \u003cbr /\u003e Nothing brings only when the basis of this one has HDMI output AVCHD is a compressed stream. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Offtopic \u003cbr /\u003e To circulate for a few months rumors that Apple plans to completely pulped his professional division. \u003cbr /\u003e After so that's already been taken FCP7 Sun I see little point in working with FCPX. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e These are dieAvidEntwickler after the fiasco FCPX finally woke up and you have already made good NLE Konkurrenzfaehig finally, only that it now actually next
Antwort von nordheide:
\u003cdiv class=\you have already made good NLE Konkurrenzfaehig finally, there is now only the actually next premiere noKonkurrenz more. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Since when do you cut and how "professional" do you work? \u003cbr /\u003e If one belongs to the "younger" generation and of no value to two desktop monitors, as well as a preview monitor sets FCPX determined is not wrong. \u003cbr /\u003e If you do not even play that fast on a deck or a DVD recorder must be consistent with FCPX bites. \u003cbr /\u003e If there is a no preference, it does not need a video or audio tracks numbered and no one goes to FCPX second monitor. \u003cbr /\u003e etc. ... \u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e ProRes and FCPX is just the thing for me. I cut primaer wedding videos. FCPX came for me at just the right time, because I had noLust, I 40Incorporate hours worked into a program where I need only use 20% but as long to get a.Capable 20%. Multicamschnitt you can now carry out almost perfectly, when you saw only a 5 minute tutorial. Sensational. Audiosync with external source without key hit without plug-in. Class! \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e FCPX is intuitive to use, gives me (!) All the opportunities that I need and cost only 400 incl Motion and Compressor. For DVD and Bluray creation, I am toast. This is currently even scrap FCPX. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Your arguments for FCP I can understand and it would have angek.tzt me if I had the aforementioned 40 hours invested to have bought the vlt then ne software. is not maintained next
|
