Frage von robertosh:
Hello,
I'm so indecisive ..
actually I do not own a HD television, no HD editing suite, and absolutely no high-anything.
Only a fairly brisk iBook with FCP5 And so what we need ..
Now the question: I need an all-round camera, with which I super short films with good film can look and realize s.and synonymous with the times, I can shoot at events .. previously had the Canon XL1s. When I was incredibly disturbed that the 16:9 mode appears stretched in VF and you never really knew where the picture is now really really ends ..
Well .. Should I now buy the HDR FX1 synonymous if I can not soo much with the huge resolution beginnings? Or a similar model but without HD, if there is anything at all comparable?
Something else: can you do when XL1s something against this extended, which loads not to Resolutiongeht?
Many people ask at once, I know ..
Antwort von jens:
The FX1 would certainly be a good solution. Especially since you can indeed downkonvertieren synonymous for pal (and it should) still looks very fantastic.
Just look for the film seems to me the DVX100 (AE / BE) be of Panasonic a very good choice for you. PowerMac raves desöfteren diesbzgl of her. As far as I know, is recommended for "real" but still a 16:9 anamorphic lens for that piece of jewelry.
Greetings,
Jens
Antwort von Robert Eder:
Hello,
You purchase the FX1.
It is a very good cameras and I use them again and again gladly.
I had often situations in which I could compare the FX1 my sony VX2100, pd150/170, dvx100, XL1S, xl2.
The FX1 is cut off at a subjective and not scientific assessment ever s.besten.
The lower light sensitivity of the fx1 does not bother me. I had them in a concert setting times against the PD170. The signal of the PD170 was indeed bright, but synonymous, and against the horrible images of fx1 ugly.
One bilaterally enötigt the FX1 is not anamorphic, which Währe blödsinn because they already 16 / 9 does. While still 1440x1080 but ds is just the standart hdv. This material is then stretched s.rechner or tv car at 1920x1080 because of pixelaspects of 1.33.
in dv mode I would not work with it. prefer 1080i or p to record and then by ilink conv. output in pal.
1080p, yes, it is synonymous, although the picture in the display jerky frightened furchbar what, but s.rechner sees the material then quite good!
Regards, Robert
Antwort von WeiZen:
Moin,
1080p, yes, it is synonymous, although the picture in the display jerky frightened furchbar what, but s.rechner sees the material then quite good! How?
What is the difference from 2000/2100 respectively PD150/170 regards to FX1, I can agree.
Antwort von wolfgang:
Since when the FX1 is 1080p? She can definitely only 1080 50i.
Antwort von molch:
well,
PSEUDO And 1080p
Antwort von Robert Eder:
fx1 clear that the chip in the camera with interlaced scanning, which I did not say that. will naturally aggregated in the camera.
the material is still usable.
Of course you can ReelSmart synonymous with "amongst others. after deinterlacing.
Regards, Robert
