Logo Logo
/// 
CANON HFG10 wirklich überteuert?

CANON HFG10 really overpriced?



Frage von Heiner Kunk:
Februar 2012

I want my HFG10, and it annoys me clear that it is not 50 but 25 are true and that I'm not a.Capable LEGRIA. It does not matter! So much does the return of non-synonymous. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e At any rate I advise all my friends Filmuni A.The on it. You mean that the HFG10 is overpriced, and that the SD909 is just as good. My claim is: \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e TOUGH-as often on the road (which is why I hate it the Pladtikbomber SD909) \u003cbr /\u003e - COMPACT (from the above reason) \u003cbr /\u003e - Requires semi-professional quality with good optics as for documentary \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I travel to Bangladesh, therefore, need a very good but very handy camcorder. I have 1300 at my disposal. My 5D MII is for the type of shot (often Aurofokus situations) is not very suitable



Antwort von domain:

Hopefully soon to report low-flying your Question. As you will surely get a truly objective answer. It was the beginning of this camera namely a.ziemlich critical about was, but ultimately recognize slight advantages over the competition.



Antwort von Heiner Kunk:

\u003cdiv class=\








Antwort von Tiefflieger:

\u003cdiv class=\Recordings (often Aurofokus situations) is not very suitable. \u003c/div\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e - Semi-professional Qualiaet what is it? \u003cbr /\u003e According advertisement can have all of the camcorder, the manual can be set. \u003cbr /\u003e Optics is the first factor of many in the image quality. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e - Compact includes robust of times already. \u003cbr /\u003e On a toy car can come to. From a Hummer to be run over. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e - TOUGH ..... \u003cbr /\u003e For each camcorder with plastic components (virtually all), there are Umbausaetze. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e First As would be the shoulder camera dummy, there holds any other filmmaker respectful distance and all have to say what you want to talk in front of the lens a.and. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Second Titangehaeuse HighEnd, consisting of \u003cbr /\u003e - Three lockable function rings \u003cbr /\u003e - 10 programmable function keys \u003cbr /\u003e - All electronicand electrical compnent are stored in gel \u003cbr /\u003e First The gel protects the sensitive parts of -50 degrees to +150 degrees Celsius \u003cbr /\u003e Second Is it electrically non-conductive and protects against corrosion \u003cbr /\u003e Third It has damping properties (concussion), protects all that is embedded in it. \u003cbr /\u003e 4th Constant is keeping all components in the operating range of 20 degrees Celsius (+ / -5 degrees) \u003cbr /\u003e 5th It is still a Antibeschlagtuechlein, never tarnished lenses in the tropics. :-)) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Now I must run away and I cringe. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Greetings low-flying aircraft \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Why you should not use more cameras 50i \u003cbr /\u003e (click and enlarge up to Alias \u200b\u200b| Wavefront Maya | Wavefront Mayaing) http://forum.slashcam.de/viewtopic.php?p=537578 # 537 578 \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Why is preferable to 50p, the camera of a nearly 1920x1080p50



Antwort von Heiner Kunk:

thanks, that was very entertaining ;-), but you have constructive suggestions synonymous? Especially for HFG10 even?



Antwort von domain:

\u003cdiv class=\



Antwort von Tiefflieger:

Valent titanium is safe and has to do with feel. \u003cbr /\u003e - Basically plastic is sturdy and impact resistant. \u003cbr /\u003e - So far I have (or emptied the camera bag when open), my camera has not posted (JPEG) or dropped \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e to top \u003cbr /\u003e Magnesium oxide ceramic with plates and thread for tripod would be a bonus (slippery and rugged)



Antwort von domain:

It is remarkable, especially low-flier synonymous announcement that gel protects all the important parts. Now tell me honestly, where are those quantities built in the a.Gel Panas?



Antwort von Heiner Kunk:

So the HFG10 None of you has probably kept in the hands, huh? Too bad. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Once inside Asian or other countries with ehoehtem of dust traveling around, this will lead to plastic bomber external in nature rather than Untensil offense. I have already namely some broke down in this way and it's not fair when his material shortly after a trip to the bay soclhen I would like to sell in advance have a robust thing, and robust as compact must not exclude themselves. The Hfg10 shows that, right? Yes yes, I know, they may have more of an Optics robust, but still suggests itself as to what Sooner (mini-DV) camcorders were synonymous but something more robust. Why must be the only easy and good now? That can make the Yuppie still synonymous HD images from his jacket pocket



Antwort von Tiefflieger:

For dust and moisture, it is Kamerabags or Unterwassergehaeuse. \u003cbr /\u003e If you want to use it a protected camera, then there are favorable or Actioncams SonyHXR-NX70. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e There is no use in rain or dust unproteced a camera. \u003cbr /\u003e Later than after 1 month and a crunch in concrete enclosures (independent of plastic). \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Honestly a high quality camera is broken a.Abend, blown out and cleaned. \u003cbr /\u003e But in the pampas with cold fingers or sweat-wet foreheads? \u003cbr /\u003e I see a high quality camera as a "Praezisionsinstrument" and will handle it accordingly. \u003cbr /\u003e Expensive Semi-Pro or Pro cameras are perhaps more robust, but have limitations synonymous. \u003cbr /\u003e In Wuestenregionen sand everywhere is clean. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Greetings low-flying aircraft \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I had



Antwort von Heiner Kunk:

\u003cdiv class=\financed with professional equipment, which was insured high-anyway. Sometimes remains of both synonymous, and one must carry his own material \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e A concrete example: \u003cbr /\u003e I am of Mumbai to Chennai (Madras) drove 42 hours with a long train. In one compartment is approximately 50 people. I did not have much space, the eruptions were not synonymous with no. I constantly met a.einen rice bag (knnen be very hard), or synonymous a.einen elbow or bed edges. While holding the camera, but it was quite beautiful finish after 3 months of continuous travel. Of course I cleaned them in the evening, but it detracts from everything: I want a stable camera, and they represent the Henkel cameras like the FX7 so synonymous. Why must the expensive Panasonic, for example, seem so cheap, if they are already synonymous semi-professionals



Antwort von Tiefflieger:

Let's say 2 big Batteries, Charger and Camera cost EUR 1200. \u003cbr /\u003e A professional camera with accessories costs about 7000 EUR. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Therefore you buy eight semi-pro camcorder. \u003cbr /\u003e (Battery and another you can keep) \u003cbr /\u003e Actually, the camera in the price range is a disposable item. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Sure you have a professional camera with all the settings under manual control, but image quality is not necessarily better. \u003cbr /\u003e In the contrary, if you are using high quality 1080p50 you're served with a simple way better equipment. \u003cbr /\u003e (Dust on glass sensor when changing lenses, weight, filter change without inclusions and fingerprint, tilting in the ropes, etc.) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e When a camcorder is for me the important points \u003cbr /\u003e - Image stabilization (optical and electronical) \u003cbr /\u003e - Color separation and








Antwort von cebros:

I like my XA10 (= G10 handle with RF) precisely because it still holds something in their hands. Other consumer devices (including SD909) are just too small and too light. On the other hand, I handle the camera for most of the bets (eg travel) to large and were too heavy, so I think FX7 with low hours, finally sold again. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e She also makes a robust and sophisticated look. However, I would like this does not necessarily have to really put to the test. Also, remember that act in a fall from the higher weight synonymous larger forces on the camera. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Compared with DV-times but I believe that most modern cameras have a problem, as they do without filigree band mechanism. And that the camera due to moisture abrupt



Antwort von domain:

The Panas are simply too small and operate only with the tweezers. Canon has recently been understood rather what is at stake. \u003cbr /\u003e But still, the FX1 is the indestructible workhorse for me. Since salt crystals and glue already on it Aetnaasche and still there is no crunch in the threads and in the drive. As long as this standard is not met, I would have no confidence at all about a camera. \u003cbr /\u003e The XF100 comes to me as much more like a toy, let's see ...



Antwort von Jan:

Well, the RF G weighs 10 just 150 grams more than the Panasonic. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Extreme robustness can not speak as synonymous not with the 580 grams of the HF G 10. Even though she is very well made and is synonymous Sun holds. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e In both models, yet I have come across ... noDefekte \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Yes, if you look at the review of your camcorder comparison (above) looks, because of me synonymous with Videoaktiv.de to get to the conclusion that the 400 surcharge only partially worthwhile. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Not without reason the magazine Chip awarded at nearly the same final score for SD 909-50 points for the price range / performance. The Panasonic was 81! Points. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e At about 400 price difference, but one must ask whether the better canon weak light (ye s largest advantage



Antwort von Jan:

\u003cdiv class=\



Antwort von Tiefflieger:

For me, a camera can cost as much or more to be professional. \u003cbr /\u003e The deciding factor for me is the picture quality. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Another thing is the "common" workflow and standardization. \u003cbr /\u003e Because someone is in training, he is with MPEG-2 and later work with H265. If necessary. even with RED RAW, or other 3x16 bit format (13 stops and ISO 800). \u003cbr /\u003e 25i (25P) is the most common format is 720p50 or better. \u003cbr /\u003e In the Cinema or 24p 3D/48p, 4K is the near future. \u003cbr /\u003e (SonyF65 has an 8K sensor, clean with the 4K and works in color space is better than 70mm film) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Basically everything has to be standardized and comparable. \u003cbr /\u003e Broadcast, Cinema and to Bluray / DVD (if synonymous can be generated from sub-1080p50 formats). \u003cbr /\u003e The camera should choose for



Antwort von cebros:

There are other criteria as the image quality. The current camcorder the "big" Manufacturer bildmaessig but are so close together that you could grab this respect, to just any model. If you tell the difference hann only seen from 30 cm in front of the 200cm-screen, that's really realitaetsfern. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Since winning other criteria, such as the handling, use, and if you look at the device with easy to feel well again a.Bedeutung. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e With a camera that fits comfortably in the hand, and you know it accordingly, you shoot better photos. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e What I digest at all, for example, the high the resolved pixels, autofocus when my pumps, I have turned on the absence of meaningful control has focus? Or, my motive is gone long before I was in the



Antwort von KSProduction:

[Quote = "Heiner Kunk"] I want the HFG10, and it annoys me clear that it is not 50 but 25 are true and that I'm not a.Capable LEGRIA. It does not matter! So much does the return of non-synonymous. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e At any rate I advise all my friends Filmuni A.The on it. You mean that the HFG10 is overpriced, and that the SD909 is just as good. My claim is: \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Since your friends have quite synonymous, and since it is the brand new Panasonic X909 HC now seen for 899, - there is the case even more clearly as with the SD909.




Antworten zu ähnlichen Fragen:
Canon Roadmap 2017: 4K Canon EOS C100 MK III zur NAB?
GoPro passend zu Canon XA20 und Canon LEGRIA HF30
GoPro passend zu Canon XA20 und Canon LEGRIA HF30
Verringert 4K-Crop für Canon R -- neuer 0.71x Metabones Speedbooster Canon EF auf RF
Canon EOS Kameras als Webcam mit neuer Beta Software von Canon
Canon auf der NAB 2018: Canon EOS C100 MKIII vs Vollformat Spiegellose ?
Messevideo: Canon Sumire - erste Canon Vollformat Cine Objektivserie mit PL Mount // NAB 2019
Canon HF100 VS. Canon PowerShot SX530 HS
Unterschied Canon xa 20 und Canon hf g30
24 fps für Canon EOS RP und Canon EOS 90 D als freies Firmware-Download verfügbar
Canon 100-400 an C300 (war: Canon C300 PL auf EF umbauen?)
Neue Canon Objektive: RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM, RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM und besserer Augen-AF für Canon EOS R und RP
Canon XL 1
Canon HG 20
Canon HV 20
Canon Powershot G2
Trauerlied Canon
Canon S2 IS Erfahrungen
Canon EOS R5
Canon FD - Blendenproblem
Canon HV 30 Datenübertragung
Canon MVX250i
Canon EOS R
Canon EOS 5D Mk IV...
Canon 80D ?
Canon EOS 5D 2

















weitere Themen:
Spezialthemen


16:9
ARD
AVCHD
AVI
Adobe After Effects
Adobe Premiere Pro
After effects
Apple Final Cut Pro
Audio
Avid
Avid Media Composer
Cam
Camcorder
Camera
Canon
Capture
Capturing
Clip
EOS
Editing
Effect
Error
Export
File
Files
Film
Final Cut
Format
Formate
HDR
Import
JVC
Layer
Light
MAGIX video deLuxe
Magix
Microphone
Monitor
Movie
PC
Panasonic
Pinnacle
Pinnacle Studio
Player
Premiere
RAM
RED
Recording
Red
Software
Sony
Sound
Studio
TV
Tape
Video
Videos