Infoseite // Camcorder or Bridgecam?

Frage von mehaniker:

Hi all, \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I stand before the election a Bridgecam (and the relatively cheap, I would of got a friend) or buying a camcorder. The Bridgecam the Panasonic FZ-45 as a camcorder and I've picked out the SonyHDR-CX250E. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I mainly want to record Sportfilmchen (, surfing, snowboarding, mountain biking). Furthermore, this apparatus should be easy to simply (; auto-focus!). And I want to then achieve a good quality as possible. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e The Question is what is better for my Requirements or how big the difference is in the film quality at the two. \u003cbr /\u003e Can you give me tips? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Thank you!


Antwort von Karotte:

Hi, \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I had the Panasonic FZ150, that of handling and image quality comparable to probably (I do not know if the FZ45 has a Zubehoerschuh and microphone jacks, which I want to do without). \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e The picture quality was good - but I've come to the conclusion that the Lumix can not replace a camcorder. First, the auto-focus for that is simply not good enough - sometimes "pumps" it constantly (especially with moving objects that lie in one). It's annoying ever properly. In addition, I have for my purposes, and zoom back out slowly and easily, that's impossible - the zoom button is fiddly and the zoom is fast (and loud). \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Since the photo quality of the Lumix synonymous rankam not nearly a.eine HDSLR, I was the bottom line too much compromise


slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash