Frage von ThomasANP:
When I look today a camera for ¬ 1000 to buy, I will be ever a noticeable difference in film quality look as opposed to a 5 years old was 500 ¬ expensive (sony trv140) camera? Is it worth ¬ 1000 to invest if I want to improve my image and then I get the same in a new-looking camera with a few new features?
Antwort von Jan:
Hard to say, on one Page are features (focus ring) to the beginner TRV 140 only when the top-class consumer to find (GS 500 & MVX 45i), synonymous an S-Video / DV IN / OUT jack, microphone input, headphone output then many average models, have had today have mostly only top model.
Therefore, the improved electronics, signal processors can be even better the color, saturation and brightness of the vote, the speed of the processes has significantly improved synonymous. The now mostly used smaller CCD sensors are better utilized, a high light output to keep the ratio signal with no data to clutter (Picture Noise) to deteriorate.
In normal situations, the picture is synonymous with a GS 500 to a similar level, in the border areas such as light sleep, the GS 500 has a better picture established. Because the DV / Digi 8
Act prescribed only 720x576 pixels s.Ende on the tape is no preference on TRV 140 or GS 500, the image differences only visible in a direct comparison, and of amateurs might not be.
In areas such as manual manual white balance, manual shutter, aperture or gain, manual Tonaussteuerung, microphone input, remote control cable is the GS 500 has ne Professioneller track.
VG
Jan
Antwort von ThomasANP:
If I were now in the building wants to see a difference because nothing happens when I buy what of 1600?
Antwort von Jan:
If we are to SD 576x720 pixels will be so only in small degree in terms of sharpness and color quality of light slumber performanceund. A real picture is much better in my opinion only in the Digi Betacam squad to find.
Since I and my friend again last note had the synonymous a Canon XL 1 despite Bombastic Equipment & Product Picture quality is no better than a Panasonic GS 500, the AF and in harsh contrasts Consumer GS 500 was even more clear. I can at the XL 1 Picture a little more to spice it up, as large as the price difference of the two is the image quality is not.
You underestimated me the cameraman, the right lighting and the Tonkomponenten.
Also, a buddy of me must be with his JVC DV 500 synonymous bold light suitcase to bring auszuleuchten properly if the room is not well lit, just like my friend with the expensive new 4000 ¬ PD 170 turns.
Yes it is clear the snooze photograph a corner brighter and noise in the class VX 2100 & PD than 170 consumer 500th GS
If I were with a GS 500 and turn well illuminated, synonymous has a PD 170 problems like good picture in bad lighting with no spaces to get lit, I can believe.
I guess rather then the manual functions of a more expensive camera or faster direct influence I have on this (manual white balance, shutter, aperture, gain, sharpness + zoom, built-in ND filter, Lanc Remote Control for s.Tripod, XLR (PD 170 ) for rugged appearance and möglist little interference and a fast and good Auspegeln of the sound.
VG
Jan
Antwort von poluroud20:
That is exactly what I'm trying to find out it is like in a XL1 to invest or the GS 500 can be the same when it comes to building it. Would like a few screenshots of my material to better show to see with what I had to work until now, but may not be of zb mediaplayer make a screenshot.
How do I do a screenshot s.besten?
Antwort von Jan:
No. I do not, the picture in about equal strength.
I have no aufgezeichntes XL 1 material for me to show so far because everything turned material (GS 500, XL 1, PD 170) with my friend, who cares at the cut, which I had little idea how.
We even have times GS 500 and XL 1 material mixed together, at the intersection has only very subtle Camera view of what was what. The XL 1 fell by a little better color setup, but synonymous in the poorer pumping AF and completely overwhelms the faces in light sleep, when harsh contrasts came into play.
That's me in now for 3 shooting with the two Kanidaten have a XL 1 is in the future from our Project is no longer made (2 camera men are grossly disappointed), either 170 or PD unless otherwise does 500th GS
Maybe someone somewhere test pictures or a link on the Internet.
VG
Jan
Antwort von camworks:
XL1 is already synonymous Stone. Then came the XL1S and XL2 afterwards.
Antwort von Jan:
That is true, but according to VAD, the current XL 2 even lichtschwächer than his predecessor XL 1 p.
That is a belief s.Ende war, and partly not to know the pros. They have partly superior knowledge 5000-10000 ¬ with their cameras, but no personal Comparison with a recent consumer good like 500th GS Most assume that for 1000 ¬ just to get is scrap.
The fitting of the models is clearly better, just like the manual and influence the value of the housing, or partially used Lenses and their nature is obvious to me.
The Picture s.Ende received, take as XL 1 for me is not better. Rather, it is important that the cameraman / woman (yes you husband always says there are good girls) the filming keyfacts understand
- Lighting, Sound, Postpro - there can be a really good one with the new XL 2 in the white barriers, because this assumes the camera makes good pictures alone in any situation.
On my last rotation I have a 3 / 4 hour short light received instruction on how to neatly with 3 lights illuminates what color foils are used, how & when dimmed is a good person auszuleuchten.
The best example of the thread a few days ago with Iris - with the JVC DV 4000 (in the forums sometimes made crude down) similar or better
Makes a material with some 7000 ¬ technology.
VG
Jan
