Infoseite // Canon HF 100 - image quality vs. FXP. FP + vs. SP vs. LP



Frage von itsbeenmypleasure:


Hi all,

had since yesterday, the 100th RF I have with the various shooting modes and synonymous around with a lot to read in this forum.

As an output device, I have the Mitsubishi HC 6000 Full HD beamer 1080p24 capable with excellent Silicon Optix HQV De-Interlace.

The question to me is:

If the material is in the highest and thus speicherintensivsten Auflösungsmodi (ie FXP) anyway just interpolated, it would be because my set-up is not useful, in one of the lower modes to favor the longer recording time?

It should however be no preference whether the Camera in the Studio (memory intensive) or the De-Interlace of the output device to 1920x1080 hochskaliert now. Or because I understand what's wrong?

Or another way: I lose image detail and / or image quality if I use a lower mode than FXP?

Regards
Cengiz

Space


Antwort von Bruno Peter:

Should you get it out easily with your own experiments.
If you like someone here would say that you actually lose picture quality, you are to retirement age suggests conditioned ...

Space


Antwort von wolfgang:

Then you're so conditioned, so we should say nothing to you? Nee.

So the FXP mode in the test has demonstrated a higher horizontal Resolutionals the other modes. For this reason, it is actually recommended in the FXP mode to film. In fact you can prove s.geeigneten images, or synonymous with test images - if not quite synonymous easy.

Now you stop conditioned!
:)

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash