The "Law on the copyright s.Werken of Fine Arts and Photography (KunstUrhGes) regulates yes somewhat exactly when and when not the consent of a person depicted is needed.
My specific problem: I will soon turn into a holiday resort (Imagefilm). With children are most likely to see in the picture (and this is synonymous as well ...). Because they are "only as an accessory location ..." appear, the principle without consent:
Since it is the children, I wonder whether perhaps synonymous nor other laws materialize (Jugendschutz. ..?), restrict the Whole.
Weiß da jemand was randomly drüber?
Antwort von veejay:
when children are filmed, the written consent of the parents is available. I've been s.Schulen, kindergartens etc already provides 20x durchexerziert. The anger may otherwise while shooting spontaneously or later, with the shooting zBWiederholung come. So slip ready. If no child synonymous only recognizes it may be different. But du film certainly "visible" people.
Antwort von FrankP:
Hmmm ... that it is probably in principle a good idea is to use the images to be approved, it is clear to me already. Whether this in my context is feasible is another question (will probably look like (eg) a shot in the outdoor pool). For everything else would then hold a permit is needed.
Basically, I had but after the legal basis required. Because if there are no other rules, then applies the law of the first quoted me.
Antwort von KrischanDO:
on the Fast: Shot in the outdoor etc.: No problem (except that you someone for a pedophile could videographers, so do big station, 3 Alukoffer, Tripod, Tonangel ...)
The rule repeatedly cited "more than 7 persons - no consent needed" does not exist. Participants s.Demos, public events, etc. must tolerate synonymous, in the context of a report to be displayed.
Details on www.fotorecht.de
If practicable, leave in the nearby part of the plant only people inside who have signed and that a voucher for a Manta-plate or so have received.