Frage von iturbucz:
Hello,
I would have to build a more favorable editing system. I would Wehlen of the above alternatives. I know - sometimes - only Vegas 6.0. Is she with compared to a Edius 3 Pro / Broadcast, or perhaps a simpler Avid software? The hardware I would be with all these softwares use a used HP Workstation (HP xw6000 or xw8000). Is there jemenden who has experience with all these systems already or they can compare? As a capture card I would take I have a Decklink of (extreme) -> Vegas 6.0 or any of Edius -> Edius NX, or at best SP. If you could use the Avid Mojo.
I would be for the system to exceed ¬ 3,000-5,000, - to spend.
As a recording format I want to use DVCPro, Betacam SP and DV. It would be very useful if the software could work directly with the aforementioned formats.
Is there a capture card, the component input for analogue material has and can work really well with Vegas - and perhaps professional-quality -.
Thank you!
Istvan
Antwort von jeantier:
Edit Each suite has something for themselves. For years, I cut with TV premiere contributions and then I wandered through the velocity of it.
Each software has its strengths and weaknesses, each with its application-specific behaviourism.
Or views not expressed by the bag. Test it for thyself Most have a trial version. Personally, I am eventually landed in Vegas and think it's cool, because very intuitive. Adobe is always a bit slower than the Marktund takes his time.
1998 hardly anyone would have thought that there would be times Broadcastfähig - now it is fighting s.der Top 5 Edius is a quiet but
very decent fellow.
By Production Suites Adobe is of course a clear advantage when graphics and image alienation constitute a major part of your production.
But the amount of money you now see a plethora s.Möglichkeiten are now in there ... take your time and test yourself with.
