Infoseite // Copy chain complete: MacBook, Display Port and iTunes



Newsmeldung von slashCAM:


Copy chain complete: MacBook, Display Port and iTunes of rudi - 18 Nov 2008 11:47:00
After some users initially pleased that the new MacBooks now a modern DisplayPort interface bring, are now synonymous slow the disadvantages of the new plug is obvious. Because the display port is in the truest sense very closely with the HDCP copy protection verbandelt. This in turn allows the playback of protected shooting only displays also support this encryption. A playback via analog outputs without HDCP and DVI is no longer possible, because this issue so theoretically with a capture card could capture. And how it looks, the new iTunes films with a similar copy protection. So if you have an older display, you can then this (despite not exactly cheap adapter) is not more to Glotze current films. Na toll ...

This is an auto-generated entry



Space


Antwort von koji:

So apple is always uncongenial to me ... I'm not even sure whether the notebooks ever fullHD schafffen;)

the apple to me is more like in the biblical

Space


Antwort von WoWu:

@ Koji

This will soon be with you every copy-protected software to go, what do you think, why synonymous HDMI (besides DP) has been made?
Only the fact that Apple's iTunes already offers VoD leaves him just the first who must do .... Finally, this is not a decision of Apple but belongs to the license terms of film transferor.
To copy this in future will probably not come around more providers.
Where is the problem? I do not assume that you have your movies .... no, not quite sure ..!

Space


Antwort von Daigoro:

2 big problems:

1. BluRay Disk file similar structures in even recorded material that is not with software lets play, because it seems like a pirate copy looks
(individual reports, there are now)

2. If the entire chain fails, because a part is not up to date, one is almost forced to upgrade everything. While this is the meaning of the industry, but in terms of the customer is not.

2 small problems:
1. If a manufacturer is not exactly holding s.die specifications, can be synonymous factory new device to total failure of the chain lead
(individual horror reports about 'blocked' Television is now)

2. Copy protection mechanisms are for the people who really matters with criminal energy, want to copy a maximum of a small obstacle.
As long as the technique in his own house is, it can be hacked.

Space


Antwort von WoWu:

All right ... but all individual cases where it is always about new technologies.
And what concerns Raukopie ... it finally succeeds synonymous people barred windows to crack ... therefore still remains the burglary offense.

Space


Antwort von Daigoro:

"WoWu" wrote:
And what concerns Raukopie ... it finally succeeds synonymous people barred windows to crack ... therefore still remains the burglary offense.


Well, at gaengelnden the scope of the current DRM Gedoenses (in the absence of a better word) presents itself to the lay person involuntarily the question whether the lattice there are burglars out, or the consumer to keep indoors.

What this wunderhuebsche penthouse apartment suddenly mutates and the prison meaningful and desired features such as backup copy of the private limited or excluded simply because the possibility for abuse exists (for example you live in a house completely barred for fear of theft?).
If a manufacturer which does not voluntarily replace any damaged disks and more and more only 'virtually' there may be expensive purchased music and movie collection quickly transform billions in stock exchange and gone. :)

Since it is necessary for the industry but ever ask themselves whether they sell or carding their customers generally want to criminalize ...

(ok, maybe a little too much into metaphors geschwelgt)

Space


Antwort von WoWu:

... I do not know whether a judge of this line of argument to an acquittal could durchringen ...

Space


Antwort von Pillermännchen:

Buy the shit but just not

Space


Antwort von Daigoro:

"WoWu" wrote: ... I do not know whether a judge of this line of argument to an acquittal could durchringen ...

Luckily, the customer may by consumerism itself.

Man 'buys Scheiss not easy' (accurate but dramatically expressed) and observed the clever industry to complain if its not reached "critical mass".
Self-blame, as I say. User friendly looks different.

Space



Space


Antwort von Quadruplex:

Not that I like Apple: But the facts, it seems in fact a quirk instead of intention to act. Loud

Space


Antwort von Pillermännchen:

Looks to me more likely to retreat from battle because Kundengemecker.

Still works with the market economy.

Space


Antwort von Quadruplex:

"Piller males" wrote: Looks to me more likely to retreat from battle because Kundengemecker.
This may be the apple make disciples among themselves.

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash