Frage von Alex.A:
Hello,
I would like my HDV recordings, cut in Premiere CS3 as HDV 50i Project 1080, and export the whole disc in a Bluray bring.
Now, there are settings in Adobe Media Encoder multiple profiles, which may for the Bluray Disc applicable. First, the profile would Bluray MPEG2 and H.264 to the other Bluray.
Which of these would be the correct standard for Bluray?
For a clarification is requested.
For tips and help I thank in advance.
Gruss
Alex
Antwort von jazzy_d:
Mpeg2 as h.264 Both belong to the Blu-ray standard. Also still VC1 and WMV-HD.
Since you with HDV (MPEG2) material work, I would recommend you to stay in mpeg2. So must not be recoded (always tainted with a loss of quality) and it saves time. Converting to h.624 takes "forever"
Antwort von Schleichmichel:
Is that because of the HDV mpeg2 file for the Bluraydisc not synonymous already a recoding? It is of whether now is the same codec. Once the data is changed, or finds such a recoding instead.
Since the player is indeed so can be easily circumvented, it is-but if one has the time and wants to minimize loss to H.264 transcoding.
Antwort von jazzy_d:
As far as I know it's not if you are transcoding mpeg2 remains. Because I can be wrong but synonymous. Perhaps our guru WoWu there's more to say. But h.264 is certainly more compressed. And if it is right to me, I can even with HDV (1440x1080 25MBit / s) directly to a Blu-ray go.
Antwort von Axel:
As far as I know it's not if you are transcoding mpeg2 remains. Because I can be wrong but synonymous. Perhaps our guru WoWu there's more to say. But h.264 is certainly more compressed. And if it is right to me, I can even with HDV (1440x1080 25MBit / s) directly to a Blu-ray go. Even if you directly from your HDV timeline as the first, a recalculation instead. What you are about 25MBit / s write, but then only apply for a genuine blank Bluray, not for a "mini-BD" to be used for a short feature even is not unreasonable, given the brute-Prices. In the case of H.264 would be cheaper in any event, or inevitable. As but because the quality of 1080i with the Media Encoder, can I tell you not synonymous, but I hear it should be a little tricky.
Antwort von jazzy_d:
A recalculation yes. A recoding no.
The Tread-creator wants it so on a Blu-ray Disc bring.
Antwort von Alex.A:
Thank you for the answers.
As far as I am still reading it, would be on a Bluray disc in MPEG2 Bluray preset to 130 minutes on it, nor is it or was it the 130 min with respect to the H.264 codec?
Greetings and all a nice WE
Alexander
Antwort von Alex.A:
None of the answer is, what is at what codec on the Bluray disc fits?
Antwort von Axel:
Purely mathematical terms: If a Blu-ray 25 GB disc fit, would be in the untreated HDV with 25 MBit / s: 2h23m10s.
Probably, however, as with 5GB DVDs (4.37 GB) 23 GB more, then it would 2h11m23s. Assuming the H.264 of a data of 17 Mbit / s (this is probably the best quality) that you would need 3h13m43s. However, since the compression is more favorable, probably rich loose 14 Mbit / s, then you could put 3h55m12s.
As you notice, sign a few with actual experience. That will maybe / hopefully soon change. So far there are relating to Blu-ray have not read much (look at Amazon).
The crucial question is a true Blu-ray disc is not the memory requirement, but rather the compatibility of data rate, frame rate and image size. As practitioners have more to write, and not merely "goes with me's". For an overview of the requirements for Blu-rays would be grateful to many.
Antwort von Jogi:
None of the answer is, what is at what codec on the Bluray disc fits? HDV will always be in MPEG2 format LongGop with a data rate of 25 Mbit / s and written to tape is HDV - Standard. All the loss-free as possible to write to BluRay should s.Format data and nothing else changed. The H264 codec is Mpeg4 and is based on AVCHD format.
Antwort von Axel:
All the loss-free as possible to write to BluRay should s.Format data and nothing else changed. Can Alex.A therefore be confident that its HDV 1080i25 on any BD player is running? That would surely have been a statement ...
Antwort von Jogi:
All the loss-free as possible to write to BluRay should s.Format data and nothing else changed.
Can Alex.A therefore be confident that its HDV 1080i25 on any BD player is running? That would surely have been a statement ... 1080i surely interlaced, ie 50 not 25, that would be progressive (Fullscreen) But how was the synonymous. On SonyBD player runs it! Among other players, I can make no statement.
Antwort von Alex.A:
Sorry for the "Vertippser";), klaro at 50 interlaced fields.
Super, thanks a lot for the practice of values, and finally such a blank is synonymous not just cheap ...
Thanks and greetings
Antwort von jazzy_d:
What else will you stop take a rewritable (BD-RE) disc and play with it a little rum.
Antwort von Alex.A:
Without Bluray player but customer demand, this could be difficult;) but now everything is clear
Antwort von PowerMac:
Customer's request and agrees with BluRay but.
