Frage von Marv:
Hi,
you have really helped me first, which has tackled the problem with the D7000. I just now for this decision (synonymous already in the store begrabbelt geil ..: cool:)
Now I am faced with some issues in terms of Lenses. I must cover the following,
- Min easy WW also. 18mm
- Multi Focal I need "first" not so thick enough 70,80,90 or 100 (if then, later, a lichstarkes Tele)
- A lichtstrake FBW
- A good macro for flowers, nature, animals, etc.
The photographs are taken to 99% in nature, that is out there. I want to stop covering everything, so macro, nature photography, long exposures of sunrises and sunsets, animals, etc.
They should however also be synonymous for the film here!
I had put together the following and would like to hear your views whether and how to fit the D7000.
- Nikkor 18-105mm VR or 16-85mm VR II
- Nikkor 35mm 1.8
- Nikkor 60mm 2.8 or 105mm 2.8
The conflict is 18-105 or 16-85 containing the money when the trainee is quite a difference. The question is, is worth the additional cost, as far as the cheaper, both are not really bright?
So the "Always plan" and the 35mm 1.8 I wanted to buy directly and the macro again when coal is there.
What do you think?
Greeting Marv
Antwort von rush:
Evenin,
I find your reasoning quite well and understand.
Although often small and poured soup zoom "is a telling - for a start I find something quite reasonable.
First, you've got a fairly long focal length range with covered and will then determine the time if you need more WW or more telephoto.
I'm not with the 16-85's still worked the 18-105s. The former is said to lots of good in various forums - but are not synonymous, the 18-105s seems okay. I would not always be overestimated.
Qualitatively, the lenses are often quite good, the price often makes the feel of synonymous and processing. The Nikkor 50 8.1 is built around rather simple and fässt at cheap - but still make good pictures. I would do it probably depends on your budget.
I have a 30's use as a "normal lens" and that's been really fun - but I use it more like in Street or Avaiable Light stories ...
If you like photographing flowers, you will hardly come s.einem macro. Also there are some alternatives. I use a very old manual 50mm 1:1 macro. That is one probably. a bit short and has no AF synonymous - but not themselves required for macro necessarily synonymous.
I do but damn few synonymous macros - so I'm not there so much emphasis placed on it.
