Frage von dabelx:
Hello,
I wanted to buy me a camcorder and had actually thought I take the DCR-SR290. However, I am confused, because the DCR only standard resolution. In the forum I have something like "Stone Age" to read. But benefits are:
1. I am not on the Cam with the purchase has to wait (the HDR-SR7 comes perhaps irgendwan in June, who really knows when)
2. The DCR is ¬ 500 cheaper
Furthermore, the pixel numbers in both the same. The HDR has a different chip to the seemingly more images on the hard drive hike, but since I have not really perused. Both have optical image stabilization.
On the other hand, the problem of editing the AVCHD HDR data in it. It takes just a super computer.
Benefits of the HDR is 20 GB and more diverse content features such as faces index.
Now it is for me the question: Do I make a big mistake if I have the DCR-SR290 with the standard image resolution take? Or, if the difference is not so serious, so I synonymous over the next few years with the DCR clearly come without me constantly zufragen Why?
Apologies possibly the long question. Thanks for any answers.
Many greetings
dabelx
Antwort von Bernd E.:
I am also doing a big mistake if I have the DCR-SR290 with the standard image resolution take? HDD camcorders are not exactly my specialty ;-), but in general I would suggest you the technical data of the two just to compare. The SR290 is missing, for example, both a microphone input as synonymous a headphone jack, which they somewhat challenging work practically makes them unusable.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von dabelx:
It seems to me slowly zudämmern. But really I do understand it yet.
Apparently, the DCR-SR290 but only 414,720 pixels on the tape. Then I'm with the HDR much better off right?
Regards
Antwort von Bernd E.:
Apparently, the DCR-SR290 but only 414,720 pixels on the tape. So it is, ANY camcorder in PAL standard definition recording, brings the 720x576 pixels on its storage media - no preference as to whether 200-euro-entry camera or broadcast thousands of euro more expensive camcorder.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von dabelx:
Then I probably do better but the HDR-SR7 or has anyone yet because what should be?
Antwort von Bernd E.:
Then I probably do better but the HDR-SR7 I would at least have the first experiences of others to wait. Not that you note after an HV20 or HC7 always synonymous or what would be the better choice was. Such as hard disk camcorder and still more the AVCHD format is not as easy to handle as the advertising claims like.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Toccamonium:
Hi,
First, thanks for the replies. What do you or do you know of problems with the hard drive or AVCHD format?
I think somehow the hard drive has the advantage of fast access. In addition, there is less mechanical. That the hard drive synonymous break down or problems with strong movements mitsich brings, I think. What is the advantage of bands, which are actually still date?
The AVCHD format is difficult to edit. Actually, I do not really what everything is. Maybe somewhere I can not test file and try out with rumzuprobieren.
Many greetings
René
Antwort von dabelx:
Hi,
did in the last post my username forgotten. I'm sorry.
Regards
René
Antwort von Videophreak:
Hello!
So, since I own a DSC-SR290, I can be happy times my experience here into writing.
First of all let me say that the standard resolution is certainly not Stone. It has for many years served each user, and a synonymous DVD stinknormale is synonymous PAL standard. (ie the bekritelten 414,720 pixels ...) But the DVDs are not so bad. Each of the standard Resolutionverteufelt, just because it's now HD to buy there, in my opinion, is a bit too quickly with its verdict.
My DCR-SR290 is a very good camera, synonymous if they do not have some features that I s.and to quite come off. But the camera, with which I am fully satisfied, it is hardly in this price-segment. Swabs should be as easy always accept.
For me, the decision on the hard drive simply because synonymous if the MiniDV tape us for years has served, I have of the digital drop-outs now the mouth full. Since the analog outs were so comfortable ... - Yes, and I wanted to know what the CMOS chip because it does.
But basically, the decision only a question of money, because I have looked after my purchase 290er synonymous viewed the 7er. And soooo much difference is there is not. With the SR7 You basically buy two cameras. Because the performance of the 290er brings, you can of the 7er synonymous, if you in the standard-format film. You're only 7 people with the "Secure Future" on when it goes to HD.
But of the picture and sound performance will not be much different. The CMOS chip has sufficient lighting really beautiful colors, comes as good as my s.die performance 3CCD Camera approached. Only the sharpness is not quite as well as of the 3CCD. As soon as it is a bit darker, the CMOS loses its color very quickly, it will do everything rather sluggish, as I would in the saturation PrPro runterwürgen.
How well a hard drive in a video camera is, I still can not exactly say so. I have no problems with it. Of course we all know that hard disks rather allergic to respond strides, however, ... who have deliberately run with his camera against a wall? And I do not want viewers is bad, if I with the camera to have very gewackelt. A video should have been kept quiet anyway. The fact that my hard-Cam on the bike but do not buckle, is somehow synonymous clear. I would not think times with MiniDV models do. For those outdoor activities you need anyway flash memory cameras such as the SD5 or the CX6 ...
I stand under the Purchase and my first few videos with the 290er the CMOS chip with mixed feelings. This color strength due to the exposure are unknown territory for me. Even a fixation of the exposure has nothing s.der improved. But, well ... we give the CMOS chip easy time. I think he is in the consumer area even in its infancy.
What concerns the post-production ... oh well ...
I have a Core2 Duo at home, the converted tight with 4 GHz rennt ... And AVCHD test shots were already in a video track a nice Jerkiness. Although I have not many alternatives, which involves editing program, tested it, but if my VAIO in AVI Standard Def material of just 22% processor power needs (with two video tracks) then I can already rhyme together what AVCHD does. And the relevant press confirmed it, yes. 290er When you have such problems then do not because the content may no longer than SD resolution. If you, like me, but filmed in HD and want to cut, then take the 7er ... Because the offers you both ways. SD or HD. Yes, and a larger hard drive.
Good would be synonymous, both times in the cameras to take in order to get a reference. It is synonymous a matter of feel. From the handling ago, they are probably very similar, even though I have the HDR-SR7, now after I 290er know and have worked so prefer. Because synonymous if they have no focus ring, so it has at least the small Rändelrad for the sharpness on the Page ... This increases the ease already substantially ...
If you're yet to decide 290er, I can tell you that it is not a bad Ca
