Frage von Meohisto:
Hello!
I ine gederht scene, which should appear blurred.
It was largely normal sharp gederht because I thought the blur, I can still shoot digitally afterwards.
Puff cake!
Since the scene is outdoors, where it was already dark rel.t, I have a blue sky in a constant background noise. I now blur it, the stupid flickering sky. Because there just a little background noise was. Aßerdem is the outcome (of dark sky blue to mittelhellblau) is not a continuous history, but with so ugly, slightly uneven gradations.
Is it normal? What can you do.
Also, the camera was not SonyHc1 and a Sony900er DV.
Quicktime DV. On the MAC and PC problems, also with Final Cut and AE.
The few sequences where I focus using the ring optical analogue Picture blurred, so these problems do not exist.
You can not digitally blur without so strange that one has Artefackte?
So, if I have a picture in Photoshop blurred doing, I have not synonymous wreaths.
Thank you, if someone knows about what clever ...
Mephisto
Antwort von coolman:
... while in the AE-Preview (RamVorschau, 100% Qualli, 100% size) still looks a bit better than the DV gernederte ...
?
Mephisto
Antwort von Stefan:
Since the scene is outdoors, where it was already dark rel.t, I have a blue sky in a constant background noise. I now blur it, the stupid flickering sky. Because there just a little background noise was. Then noise but the sky before. Spatial or temporal smoother Smoother or combination of both in Virtualdub is good.
In addition, the course (sky of dark blue to mittelhellblau) is
not a continuous history, but with so ugly, slightly uneven gradations. Since the vote processing settings in the Project not. Hast thou not in 32-bit or 24-bit color but worked in 16-bit color?
So, if I have a picture in Photoshop blurred doing, I have not synonymous wreaths. A Picture says more than 1000 words ....
Good luck
The thick Stefan
Antwort von Ethan:
Thank you very much!
Will try the filter ..
until then
Mepihisto
