I film weddings and business, it is s.der time for new hardware.
After months of testing and comparing collected information to have a camcorder, two for my purposes s.passendsten identified:
Actually, I tend more to the V1, but there are still a few little things that keep me from the final purchase. So I hope that owners of these models or people who already have practical experience so that / had, perhaps I can help with the decision. For me, I finally decide which model will emerge, perhaps you can give me but one or the other tip.
As for the technical data and image quality, handling, etc. is concerned, I think I can reach the ninth with two really wrong.
What really clearly speaks for the V1 are schonmal two things:
1. The low weight. Since I sometimes work with no tripod, I'm happy with every ounce that the camera is easier. Which reminds me, of course, is aware of the fact that a higher weight synonymous one s.Handlings some more stability brings with itself. However, the V1, I think despite the low weight, yet still stable and wobble enough to act.
2. The two XLR inputs. Since I sometimes synonymous outdoor work, would often Microphone of a second advantage, something that I can put away and the wind. A previously tested Windfell on my current Sennheiser MKE 400, has not really proven. In addition, there are many other possibilities, especially with my purpose in the church who speak for a second Micro (; gospel choir, organ, near s.Brautpaar etc.)
These two facts make me - besides the obvious other great features tend - have much to V1.
My question relates primarily to two specific features that the FX 1000 calls her own:
1. the larger angle. I am with the camera often - sometimes forced to close premises in order for games, etc. - pretty close s.Geschehen. Comparison of this would be in the larger V1 Wide Angled FX-1000 probably of great advantage. (; Interjected: brings a wide-angle lens mountable s.der V1 noticeable improvement? And I can then mount the included compendium yet, or is this not possible anymore?)
2. The supposedly better lowlight behavior of the FX-1000. Many evening game experience available for weddings held at low or subdued lighting. Although the V1 probably - according to the reviews from many - very good in terms of image quality is synonymous with LowLight crosses the FX-1000 well better do it again here s.als the V1.
To find a dealer close to both models is stock and ready to test these synonymous site of me, "can" which is probably not easy to find, although that was supposed to be priced in the part of a good service, but well ..
For more money, I definitely get a model that combines the advantages of the two camcorders in one, but a good 3,000 euros for me, the ceiling and I think that is synonymous with one of these two devices, I probably already get a very good camcorder for my purposes.
Read All too but I think you now know what's going to me.
If I look through meaningful feedback. Thank schonmal.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
I am with the camera often - sometimes forced to close premises in order for games, etc. - pretty close s.Geschehen.
Many evening game experience available for weddings held at low or subdued lighting.
Here I have to laugh well - in the passages ;-)
Lend you play the times the two models for the "can yet be useful both equally good - nen x0.4 Wide Angle adapter and / or x0.7 should nonetheless manages to get out of the V1 was.
Well and Low Light - what does that already ... yes you have to shoot a film, and not all synonymous Tot illuminate ;-)
I'd borrow - sometimes at home test then decide.
MfG B. DeKid
Antwort von holgaaar:
yes ... that is the problem I call one of my times with just two professional camcorder gives way home. Comment If that were possible, I'd need not be here. Thanks anyway for the quick reply.