Hello people, have found the Sufu not enough info. So my question: Is it worth the almost twice expensive DV tapes or is this just a marketing ploy that these tapes would be better for the 3CCDs. What are your experiences with it. Danke & Gruss Michael
Antwort von Jott:
Better for three CCDs? Hair-raising nonsense that DV is DV. No differences in the Picture and sound quality, as digital.
There's differences in the drop-out behavior and in durability. If one of the shots which are worth, they will resort to more expensive tapes, but usually is only one in the foreground: as cheap as possible. Each, as he likes.
Antwort von macrooky:
ever Thanks for the quick reply. Where does now cheap? I now have Sony Premium (5x at 19.90 Swiss francs) and cost the Sonyfür 3CCD (3x 24.90 CHF). With prices in D you can not compare that well if there are tapes s.1.50 euros.
I give as synonymous like more of if you have a benefit.
How manifests a drop out? Is this just a few frames or is away more? Gruss Michael
Antwort von srone:
my tip panasonic (which go synonymous with 4ccd ;-)) years I have been using, no dropouts, no abrasion, 5stck ca 12 ¬ corresponds to about 18 sfr.
lg
SRone
Antwort von Jott:
DV is not critical, usually affects only one frame. For HDV image failure for half a second plus the lack of sound during this period. This is deadly serious for HDV shooting, there is therefore high-quality tapes of Sonyoder Fuji, whose performance is safe. Use only a little, hence the bad reputation of some of HDV.
Purchase any tapes and try them a try. It is generally said and that is certainly not wrong: Stay in satisfaction with the brand and the type of tape, do not mix, and always recorded only once.
