Question a.Capable XF300/305 users among you: \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e To considering a pick XF 300, as a replacement for my XLH1a give for what it apparently no (card based) successor will be more. \u003cbr /\u003e I would like to know what the 1.5 digital zoom cameras worth of CF ist.Die XLH1 had already made a bigger house of telephoto (108mm) and also synonymous change yet to be able to select the Objectively (EF- photo lens adapter) \u003cbr /\u003e For the Tierfilmerei I frequently need long focal lengths. \u003cbr /\u003e If this 1.5x digital zoom to be better than not synonymous a.anderen cams, namely the fact-of-her useless picture quality, then this would be already a no-go. \u003cbr /\u003e Thank you ever ..
Antwort von Filmo:
no one among you who has the tested before?
Antwort von Mausbaer:
I have experience with the XF300 nokonkreten, but I would tend to be in this case rather reach for a teleconverter. \u003cbr /\u003e I would prefer a digital zoom optical solutions always.
Antwort von Filmo:
for habitually yes, of course, thought only of only 1.5x zoom effect could be the quality nor accept.
Antwort von Tiefflieger:
I can \u003cspan style=\
Antwort von Bernd E.:
There's no test yet for video on Youtube, Vimeo or similar offenses, see where the effect of the XF digital zoom?
Antwort von Filmo:
've already plowed through a lot but, unfortunately ... But a lot of my low-light tests, one could, the eternal night has arrived :-) \u003cbr /\u003e YT would like to trust and I do not necessarily .. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e here in the forum was "Edgar" for the Question already asked for a teleconverter said Cam, however, he can tell his experience synonymous to digital telephoto :-))
