Infoseite // Digitizing with ADVC300 or HV40?



Frage von nwanke:


Hi,

I would like to digitize about 30 S-VHS cassettes.
That is the first time, store and forward looking with the best possible quality on hard drive.
Lt. my research suggests itself as probably a ADVC300.
Now may I ordered a Canon HV40 (miniDV) and read that convert these synonymous analog sources.
"If an analog source in the video port of the HV40 is connected, turned on the AV-DV conversion and connected the camcorder via FireWire s.den computer starts the digitization of the video material.
Before I make a wrong decision and invest many hours of work, I hope to experience / know-how.

My questions:
- Are between these variants
1) S-VHS -> ADVC300 -> PC hard drive
or
2) S-VHS -> HV40 -> PC hard drive
expected differences in quality?
Is an investment for the ADVC300 zus make sense?

- In what format should I save (resolution)?
A subsequent processing is planned.


Thanks in advance and greetings
Norbert

Space


Antwort von JMS Productions:

"Nwanke" wrote:
- Are between these variants
1) S-VHS -> ADVC300 -> PC hard drive
or
2) S-VHS -> HV40 -> PC hard drive
expected differences in quality?
Is an investment for the ADVC300 zus make sense?


Well, the ADVC-300 you just stop the possibility to seek a comprehensive image enhancement features, such as noise reduction, or you can finely adjust the image signal by various regulators.

The DV-Cam variant containing the video image is simply looped only, you have to stabilize thus synonymous to the possibility your picture (the ADVC-300 is indeed an internal time base corrector).

Normally, you should make image optimizer and improvements always s.analogen signal because there the best results are provided. Once the material is digitized, you can indeed still be synonymous filters and the like run over it, but later removal of jitter (which should catch the time base corrector auto) in my opinion is very difficult.

For optimal assessment of the analog and digital image (including all image enhancements) recommends, however, the Picture s.ADVC be tapped-300 using the phono output and to judge on a (possibly calibrated) CRT monitor. For flat panel displays provide color and video images back often distorted.

"Nwanke" wrote:
- In what format should I save (resolution)?
A subsequent processing is planned.


Both versions will auto generate a DV-AVI file that has a standard 720x765 pixels Resolutionvon, so normal SD / DVD quality.
It is advisable to maintain the synonymous.

It is on this issue, however, already dozens of posts and information. Use the search function on this nor synonymous times ...

Are you feeling however, is a really high quality and best possible digital, I would consider to hire a specialized firm. There are really serious synonymous-priced, who know what they are doing and have years of experience in this field.

A Beginners usually do not know what he has to respect and where problems could arise and how to meet them. begins Usually it already with in the playback device, 99% of the normal home users maintain their equipment hardly bring them not regular professional maintenance (according to the symbol "As long as everything works and I what see 'and hear, match so everything") so that the playback devices with the total time worn and do not promote more optimal results.

The care and maintenance of this Instant analog devices, like the thirst of man: Where a thirst (in our case, a dirty picture or even loss of picture), it is already too late. Regular maintenance is still in the analog domain containing duty!

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash