Infoseite // Experience with Velbon Tripod?



Frage von DaSeba:


Hello

Somewhere here in the forum has recommended the times someone Tripod volgende:

Velbon Video CX 686

But I have nowhere else in the forum or the internet found something about it. Has anyone villeicht experience with this tripod or similar made?

I know, there lies more in the lower price range. So we should perhaps not expect too much synonymous. But the moment I have no desire to spend 300 euros for a Manfrotto. Although these tripods are at present almost everywhere adored.
I think, something like a cross between the really cheap (50Euro) and expensive (400 euros), it should still be that the home movie maker, can satisfy a student.

Thank you ever taken the answers

Space


Antwort von Jan:

Hello,

Velbon is not a bad choice, but there are synonymous Manfrotto tripods are not only cost ¬ 300 upwards. How heavy is the camera, more than 2.5 pounds? It may not always be 501 or 503 in a non-professional cameras. A synonymous with Battery VX 2100 does not weigh significantly more than 2 kilos.

I'm in the business Manfrotto 190 (I think DB) Fluid Head + 700 RC 2 for combined ¬ 149 (On the Internet it would hardly be more expensive)
Manfrotto has just a few special offers on cheaper tripods (I refer you on Bogen Imaging.

Recently had a few test's of affordable tripods, I'll see if the time 686 was there.

LG
January

Space


Antwort von DaSeba:

How hard is exactly my camera, I do not know. It is a VX2000 or about the same weight as the VX 2100th

I'll watch my Manfrotto types times.

Thank you very much

Space


Antwort von Jan:

Hello,

Look at or were times last edition digital video assets October / Novermber as some here, including Manfrotto. But it was only to beginners Stands up to 180 ¬.
In the test, only 2 Velbon DV 7000 + DV's were 6000th

LG
January

Space


Antwort von Markus:

Hello,

could be that the tip was of me. I had ten years ago, a Velbon D-600 bought for 250 DM at that time. The pan and tilt head looks the same as that of CX-686, so I am assuming that the properties are similar.

zum Bild

In the meantime, I had one once synonymous Velbon D-700, but the professional of Manfrotto Tripod finally convinced me with its stability. A lightweight tripod is just do not have bomb-proof booth. Conversely, a felstenfest standing tripod can not really be compact. - What it comes at you in particular?

You may already know this link:
Tripods ... (Consumer and / or professional)

Space


Antwort von DaSeba:

So I looked around me once a round. A Manfrotto there with us in Switzerland, not less than 300 CHFr. So about 200 euros.

If I for a tripod or similar 190DB MN And consider a head 700RC2 Umschau in Germany, eventually coming ish synonymous with costs not less than 300 CHFr.

Occasions of Manfrotto are also very rarely encountered, at least on the Internet.

Then do I have to, willy-nilly to 300 CHFr. And hire more. I hope a Manfrotto will pay out for it.

Space


Antwort von Jan:

Hello you,

I have the 190 DB +700 RC 2 for 149 ¬ together at the store (in business-And the price is usually the Internet) among them.
But probably no one verrammscht Manfrotto, so not much better price on internet.
The Manfrotto Tripod seen but at a certain value, not cheap plastic.

LG
January

Space


Antwort von DaSeba:

Hello

Here is a confirmation of me. I have now decided on the Manfrotto tripod. So, with that of MN 190DB tripod and 700RC2 head.

The reasons for the decision are as follows:

Although the Velbon DV 7000 some 100 CHFr. (approx. 66 Euro) is cheaper, it has good qualities. It has, in contrast to Manfrotto, a leveling bubble and a horizontal and vertical degrees will s.den joints of the head.
The attenuation of the head can be adjusted separately. For fixing the recruitment of two screws are in place. In the last Videoaktiv issue is criticism that the head of the tripod screw at a fixed attenuation. In my opinion is not the case!

Although the Manfrotto is the most advantageous to his family and therefore does not have much equipment and comfort, I bought this. The compact size and weight have won. The Manfrotto is approximately 2.3 n.schwer the Velbon about 3 kg. Manfrotto has no funds because the spider, it can combine much more compact than the Velbon.

Whether the fluid head is really as good as everyone says, is yet to show. Much I have not used the tripod.

Conclusion: If you want a good tripod for little money, which is operated with two very well. Who will, however, often carry the tripod around, is to look at precisely the Manfrotto. Who tripod anyway be transported only in the car and just looking for a cheap tripod, which is helping with the Velbon DV -7000.

Space


Antwort von Jan:

Very interesting your report.
The Manfrotto Tripod has no means spider is bad indeed for the general level, so I can, however, quite different positions (the feet can spread, and the position is not as concentrated as in the Velbon)
In de gibts price range for me no better fluid head, well a matter of opinion ....

LG
January

Space



Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash