Frage von Balu7:
Hi, I have a Canon XL1S with a FD adapter that I have the following questions:
1.Eigentlich FD is an adapter but better than an EF adapter with respect to the cost or? Because the FD Obtiken are much cheaper right?
2.Gibt Fd is a wide-angle lens with zoom, which has many pictures in a room that someone knows a good? Or is there even a Obtik a relatively large focal covers? of WW to Tele? And I have since synonymous something like a factor equal (for example, as the 7.2 factor?)
3. And is the manual focus on a FD oibtik really the only difference to an EF Obtik?
Many questions, but if someone knows a lot Antowrten, I would look !!!:-))
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... Is there a Fd wideangle zoom lens with needs that many shots in an area that knows a good one? Or is there even a Obtik a relatively large focal covers? of WW to Tele ... Wide-angle zoom, there was of course with FD-Bayonet, super zooms like today are not. But if you really help those optics? Because:
... I have since synonymous something like a factor equal (for example, as the 7.2 factor ?)... That, though, because this factor is of the type of bayonet independent. Thus, even a strong Wide Anglean such an adapter to a telephoto what you indoors is likely of little use. Otherwise it would be with a 35mm adapter, but that's another site.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von FritzK:
Hi Balu 7th
I had synonymous XL 1S. Is a very good camera. Still have the 3-fach Zoom Lens, Canon original. It is worth to be filmed.
If you would like to have, short ok, then I give you my phone
MfG
Fritz
