Frage von Bernd E.:
As the search for new equipment - in this case a decent Mattebox - always goes: At first I thought the
Indien-Matteboxsei doch eigentlich ausreichend, dann fand ich erst die
X Matte Box and later
Geardeardeutlich überzeugender and nun habe ich die nagelneue
microMatteBox to favorites chosen. Before this kind of goes, I am in a few weeks for the
Antwort von Murksbruder:
Hi Bernd,
according to what criteria you convince the boxing mat?
... the Murksbruder
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... according to what criteria you convince the boxing mat ... As with some pure plays: for example, the material quality, processing, flexibility (; expandable? As well s.verschiedene optics customizable?). With s.wichtigsten - and that's synonymous a reason for my question here - I have the experience reports of users who already possible with several mat boxes have worked. If you look through the relevant fora works crystallize already differences between the models. The stage Geardear and Redrock how Vocas or Chrosziel, retires, however, for reasons of cost of from the outset.
Gruß Bernd E.
Antwort von Chezus:
bist du eig eventually found anything?
Antwort von B.DeKid:
For what ne camera then?
And if you have no house Bernd, I have 2 large barns s.Start. As could be what do ;-)
MfG
B. DeKid
So I tell the Chrosziel persl my choice would be .... ok so I expect the synonymous sowas year, and therefore the purchase price synonymous justified seinwird / can.
Antwort von Bernd E.:
... found anything? ... No and yes. No, as I have not bought (for reasons that are connected with the camera - see below). Yes, as I am clear that the Redrockmicro-Mattebox the current optimum for me.
Apart of the initial fixed now and delivery problems can be found practically only good to enthusiastic comments of users, especially synonymous what the price-performance ratio in comparison to competitors, processing and robustness are concerned. These last points are very important to me, because I loose constructions and hate cheap solutions that simplify work. Then for better quality even spend a little more! However, the RR is still significantly cheaper than Matte Boxes Manufacturer established as Chrosziel or Arri. And since I have been here in the forum had read that on ebay, India offered to Chrosziel matte quality level should move, I am interested Chrosziel actually no longer synonymous ;-) But may be that the Indians have strongly short: What I s.Erfahrungsberichten so far on these parts have read in any case was just the score processing and robustness little positive.
... For what ne Camera ...... When I've started this thread, I stood before a Purchase SonyS270 for which the matte was designed. Then my orders snowed into your house, which until further s.besten with my best VX2100 leave off - and a matte box that is larger than the camera, would be somewhat strange. For the rest I use borrowed DVCAM - and XDCAM HD cameras shoulder, but it reaches the scattering of the EB-aperture optics. And to me the only Mattebox in the wardrobe and put on every Sunday off the dust, it is still too expensive.
... if you have no house Bernd, I have 2 large barns s.Start ... So if the offer is not generous! In winter I like to come back on it, but as long as it is still warm, my cardboard box under the bridge actually quite comfortable ...
Antwort von Chezus:
For the EX 1 nehm myself I do not synonymous ago. Apparently, the RR would be synonymous not really clean at the EX 1 match. An update will apparently soon (say within the next 5 years ...)
I would be more to the front Lenses s.35mm adapter.
With a matte box for me to be a waiver utensil is visible. Those things are expensive but synonymous
