Infoseite // Fictitious: debate between proboscis and Axel: XH-A1 presets ;-)



Frage von nicecam:


Small pleasant exchange of blows?

You two seem to disagree what "neutral" terms to the XH-A1 presets.
Explained to you - we are ignorant, eager to learn!

Check it here:
Thoughts of Axel:
Re: If, when we come to
Re: Short Film - Feedback welcome.

Opinion of proboscis:
Re: XH A1 vs. FX1000

It is this:
proboscis' s "Neutralpreset" Canon XHA1 & XHA1s: Film Look for all! Paolo Ciccone: TrueColor for Canon XH A1 .

Space


Antwort von Axel:

Wolfgang's because I lack empirical knowledge. I'm just thankful for his older presets, especially "-3 dB", the euro appreciated substantially the camera right away. And in the sense that the wedding pictures that I made primarily so that were at once crisp and aesthetically appealing, optimized precisely for optimum values that are beyond anyone's individual taste (provided that the family home of Television on colorful and super-sharp or not ) all liked. What would have been farbzukorrigieren s.ihnen were just corrections to minor adjustments.

Lower color saturation and no contour sharpening are better conditions when the cameraman thought: They'll fix it in the post then like the first picture really anything. What is needed then is the right color grading, the subsequent Pimp a gray haze image to look out of the carpet pattern catalog, not to be confused with pure color correction. It is very fashionable to do that. For certain topics it is expected explicitly.

Meanwhile, I'm no longer watching yours, but, as the correct use with DSLR will be tested. It seems that the cameras should be a bit more styled towards the-3dB. Courage to do everything in-camera. The strength of these canyons is their very own look. Of course, back to focus a little bit because otherwise artifacts will be reinforced, etc., but that's my impression.

Space


Antwort von ruessel:

everything is a matter of taste.

I had explained to me at that time several days with the camera to the sad work setting (Colorless and optimize sinking Picture). It is not appropriate (expensive) means is not possible to create a preset, relatively accurately the true colors. So only with a colored test setup is not enough. Even if there with an artificial light source or with the help of the sun will set is visible on the Vectorscop. A light source has almost always own the color spectrum is unfortunately synonymous then transmits on the preset, then the colors with the light, but not guaranteed in the sun. I had decided then that the highest daily volume of the midday sun as a reference light.

Yet what about the individual values of the XHA1, whether three points higher or lower values for many parameters is hard to see. The color matrices can be rotated influence far and each other, here you could possibly come to completely different values in spite of similar color.

Completely incomprehensible, that does not make my work the Manufacturer! But it is at SonyFX1, EX1 so synonymous so the factory setting is for the birds.

The link above neutral for the preset is wrong, here are my neutral-3dB Preset: http://www.fxsupport.de/02_Canon_XH_A1.html#presets

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash