(...) I'm faszieniert of these recordings, since they can experience first hand movement.
I have the Glidecam times now viewed in more detail and according to many contributions in this suspension system seems really mature.
These two models now I take time in my immediate choice:
1. Glidecam HD-1000
2. Glidecam HD-2000
The price difference is about 100 ¬, otherwise the models differed in the strength and size.
To which model would you advise me in the long term?
Where there are serious alternatives to these two models?
Enough dasCanonEF-S 18-55 IS Lens?
Lenses that you can recommend for my needs?
Very nices video, if it is synonymous Inline.
Had mal ne question about "Schwebi - Gimbal is since nothing but just a ball joint when I have seen this right?
Here's a demo video with a 550D. Is not of me, but for me the results comparible
Hey, sorry (my opinion) the images from the video is not nearly as well, such as the video of Goop (the link).
I would advise you the Glidecam 2000th
Suited and built for HDSLRS.
The Flycam is told of how thecinecity and like you said, there are many opinions.
I will not recommend it, one reason I have already stated.
-Almost nonegativen opinions to the Glidecam HD-2000
Toll-quality workmanship and
S.Anfang hard-to tare off, then favorite playing grounds perfect!
Ps: I look for lenses again;) 24-70 mm Lenses are great!
PPs: I love jack of all trades! : D
(If only it were cheap ..: D)
(...) 24-70 mm Lenses are great! (...)
Why do you tend to Glidecam HD-2000? What are the benefits of HD for the Glidecam Glidecam 2000 compared to the HD-1000? I'm just confused a bit, the HD-2000 is not even a little too heavy for my system? would help me please, I give so much money and do not every day from noFehler.
Count of how many times your cam including Lens (and micro) weighs
If the 15% maximum load of the HD 1000 system is then the work - if not stop buying the HD 2000
It is that simple - you must complain, however, the Cam or the system (HD2000) if you want to use the 550D naked.