Frage von Front242:
Hello everyone.
Recently, I am on the Mac already has converted try and the first projects. As a solution, I cut myself for Final Cut Studio (II) decided. How to stop it, there are equal s.Anfang to some questions. I have an HDV project that I am now on a DVD pressing wants. There is the possibility to directly s.Compressor to pass. I just wondered now that Project with 1H 45min takes as long to encode? The calculator has been working ~ 7 hours and allegedly still needs another 2 hours? :-( If you want so long? I used on the PC PremierePro2 had declined and because the inside of a few hours, however, nor was the DV format.
My calculator only has 2GB of RAM is too little? Is an Intel Core2Duo Mac. In another forum I read that you have what may recruit to the two Prozessrkerne of Mac exploit (Q-master?). Can I thus a speed boost, since as long render times slow down the whole works.
Yet something fundamental to the process: Is it better the first project as a Quicktime movie to export to Compressor and then to encode, or is it no preference whether you make out of FinalCut. Or perhaps more meaningful, all directly in DVD Studio to do, because ultimately I would like to create a DVD (best quality of course! :-))
Perhaps you have a few tips for a newbie FCS?
Antwort von Front242:
Probably the title is unfortunate elected or it's really quite normal that the rendering times for FinalCut for HDV immeasurably to the rise? :-(
Antwort von weitwinkel:
maybe just to test:
10 minutes in QT format hd rausrendern and then with
mpeg streamclip after sd-pal down reckon ...
gruß cj
Antwort von Sonny83:
Hast thou done much s.Post? Effects, etc. it takes some time already.
If I eg 2m. 720p XDCAM EX material. H264 Quicktime with 5MBit / s coding, which alone takes about 30 minutes on a MacBook Pro with 4GB Ram / 2.66 GHz Core2Duo
Antwort von Front242:
Hast thou done much s.Post? Effects, etc. it takes some time already.
If I eg 2m. 720p XDCAM EX material. H264 Quicktime with 5MBit / s coding, which alone takes about 30 minutes on a MacBook Pro with 4GB Ram / 2.66 GHz Core2Duo Das ist ja grad, what surprised me. In principle, the whole project a clean cut (only a few synonymous crossfades), no effects, no color correction on the video, no animations, etc.
In another forum I read a contribution that HDV because of the GOP structure unfortunately so long. Hmm, a few hours so I would understand, but 10-15h is a bit exaggerated, is not it? :-(
Antwort von RickyMartini:
If you have Vista on your Mac simultaneously installed solltest (Boot Camp), you can do so with the times Edius NEO Trial a counter-test - the skin you an HDV file Urgently raus (HDV-speed encoder)!
Antwort von Front242:
With Final Cut, I am actually very happy. It may be that there are other programs that are faster to render, but that is why the editing system to change is not an option. I'm still of the opinion that perhaps the workflow is wrong or the hardware is not (see original posting). Where are the Mac Cracks? ;-)
Antwort von PowerMac:
I maintain that the fastest workflow for HDV to SD-DVD if it was not so much effects and Grading in the timeline is:
1) Quicktime Export (not Quicktime conversion) without frames rearrange. Not as a complete file.
2) With MPEG Streamclip to SD to Pro Res 422 convert (lateral Crop of pixels per note 9), higher quality activated.
3) with (from the Finder) Compressor to MPEG-2 for DVD.
Alternatively, if you like a lot of stuff in it effects, you can see the HDV-synonymous sequence directly in Final Cut Pro in a Pro Res SD sequence and throw the rausrendern via Quicktime export. So does Final Cut Pro Downconvert quite passable and fast. Then Compressor then from the Finder.
Antwort von Front242:
Since I am again. Bin grad now be a new Project on DVD prepared. Have now a 25GB (!) Big file in the resolution 1920x1080 (current: 1614x90) 25fps available.
2) With MPEG Streamclip to SD to Pro Res 422 convert (lateral Crop of pixels per note 9), higher quality activated. Am I right in assuming that I am using the "Export as QuickTime Movie> Compression> Apple Pro Res 422 should export (see screenshot)?
3) with (from the Finder) Compressor to MPEG-2 for DVD. Sorry that I do not understand? I would then launch Compressor, the ProRes file and according to invite Elementary Stream (m2v/ac3) encode?
Thanks for tips!
Antwort von PowerMac:
http://www.finalcutprofi.de/phpboard/viewtopic.php?t=41074&highlight=hd + sd
Antwort von Front242:
Thanks for the link.
What irritates me now:
With the method here advocated FinalCut> MPEG Streamclip> Compressor I get the output m2v/ac3 a Resolution720x540 (inlusive cropping of 9px).
When workflow FinalCut> Export with Compressor> Output: m2v/ac3 I get a file with the Resolution720x404 which is the 16:9 Resolutionentspricht. Seen it surprised me that the MPEG Streamclip method as the preferred recommended. Or am I there a mistake?
Antwort von KlausZ:
And above all: Why the detour via MPEG Streamclip if you synonymous with on-board equipment of Final Cut Pro can do? I have with Final Cut Studio, an expensive all-in-One package purchased, and then with freeware components can achieve even better results? Let's hear.
Antwort von PowerMac:
Thanks for the link.
What irritates me now:
With the method here advocated FinalCut> MPEG Streamclip> Compressor I get the output m2v/ac3 a Resolution720x540 (inlusive cropping of 9px).
When workflow FinalCut> Export with Compressor> Output: m2v/ac3 I get a file with the Resolution720x404 which is the 16:9 Resolutionentspricht. Seen it surprised me that the MPEG Streamclip method as the preferred recommended. Or am I there a mistake? 16:9 HDV to SD to Pro Res, and then to MPEG-2 with Compressor?
The resolution is just wrong, but true.
