Frage von Acer:
Hello s.alle Slashcam,
I will shortly be deposited with one of my projects, Music and the Music is gemarechtlich protected, I thought with that I just these pieces on a keyboard and a piano "sequels." As would be as the Nutcracker Suite of Tchaikovsky, which is protected by GEMA. If I let myself play that's legal, right?
Oh yeah, I've heard that all the pieces no longer protected by GEMA GEMA "belong" when their Kompnist has known for more than 125 years (or so it is not exactly degrees) is dead, right?
LG
Acer
Antwort von WeiZen:
Moin,
Author died 70 years, the only way s.Rande noticed.
Antwort von Axel:
I thought with that I just sequels these pieces on a keyboard and a piano ". Great if you can play the piano. There are music programs that synonymous Classical generate synthetic instruments, and they sound like, well, as such, now fairly well. Only clear, a little idea of music should have.
As would be as the Nutcracker Suite of Tchaikovsky, which is protected by GEMA. If I let myself play that's legal, right? Even if there is someone who is not yet final for 70 years in retirement, you can abkupfern. Do not make any film composer, more or less openly. Let's say you want the saber dance of Katchaturian. Copyright still applies, but if you abänderst's a bit more None can tell you what. Right next question: From how many identical cycles is a melody as plagiarized? Three? Or not to three, and only s.vier?
I can not imagine the way that you are dead as a doornail something of Wagner (§ Whaddyacallit) just like at home in the keys and with the descendants hämmerst'll get
no trouble. But the more I do not know.
Antwort von AndyZZ:
Music, compositions and interpretations are well protected by law until 70 years after author's death. Tchaikovsky died in 1893, so you can interpret his plays himself (play music) that you get without trouble. If, however, the symphony orchestra xyz Pusemuckel set to music from the Nutcracker 1998, then you must not use this performance Gema-free. The music is indeed free, the interpretation is then protected again.
Say, anyone can play Tchaikovsky's Nutcracker Suite with impunity and to interpret themselves. However, these interpretations and performances are then protected again. Clear? Your interpretation on piano by then your nutcracker is also protected with a copyright.
Antwort von Ephraim:
Music, compositions and interpretations are well protected by law until 70 years after author's death. Tchaikovsky died in 1893, so you can interpret his plays himself (play music) that you get without trouble. If, however, the symphony orchestra xyz Pusemuckel set to music from the Nutcracker 1998, then you must not use this performance Gema-free. The music is indeed free, the interpretation is then protected again.
Say, anyone can play Tchaikovsky's Nutcracker Suite with impunity and to interpret themselves. However, these interpretations and performances are then protected again. Clear? Your interpretation on piano by then your nutcracker is also protected with a copyright. Hello,
this is true and not true:
The Nutcracker Suite is composed for the piano, she would then be arranged for piano. This has already been done by someone. It has the rights. Any publisher sells the notes, the original and the edited, and it has the rights.
If you somehow recreating the now, you play one of the inevitable edits after, that is a protected plant in some way. GEMA has specialists that the show, which is relatively easy, since each agent handled timely and according to their own opinion, and the hinterhäßt traces in the works.
Even easier is the proof, if a program used to manipulate the process. Since this has no personal intentions, it uses the Default ...
Now, if someone is able to enter so deeply into the matter, that he is handling all of these "traps" in a position (the composer) are, the question arises, why use the Nutcracker Suite? Create your own compositions s.eindeutigsten own right and if you're in the GEMA synonymous with a revenue stream ;-)
Moreover, one may quote from other works. I think there are five bars. It can make with talent, something.
So on to Nußesser suite!
Antwort von AndyZZ:
The Nutcracker Suite is composed for the piano, she would then be arranged for piano. This has already been done by someone. It has the rights. Any publisher sells the notes, the original and the edited, and it has the rights.
As you can see me, we are consuming and cumbersome, the whole Choose with GEMA and other communities of interest. Now we have to have as a videographer and editor synonymous already studied music in order to discern these subtleties still synonymous. Corrosive!
Antwort von Ephraim:
As you can see me, we are consuming and cumbersome, the whole Choose with GEMA and other communities of interest. Now we have to have as a videographer and editor synonymous already studied music in order to discern these subtleties still synonymous. Corrosive! Hello,
I understand all the fuss really. When someone uses part of your movie without paying, and ask that you will defend yourself synonymous, and if you picture the VG-art semi-annual pay for the exercise of the rights of your money, you will take the synonymous. Only with composers and musicians all over the world would indeed have the power, but do not pay. But without Moss is only grass to eat. Incidentally, the PRS does not interest group but rather a perception of society.
Antwort von AndyZZ:
I was not even upset that they are taking fees, but HOW they do it.
Each course is entitled to a remuneration to its performance, is designed like this always synonymous. I just think it's terribly complicated, it is implemented as the. Because we really need to do a study, not only to come into conflict. The effort that you have to drive there can not afford even the small traders, let alone that he will get the approval for his project of an artist or composer, which indeed is necessary before the GEMA. And to see through the charging model of GEMA is synonymous not really easy.
Fact is: you have to use as a small production company, as one-or two-man show does not stand a chance bspw a song title of Madonna or the Rolling Stones legal in his film to be allowed.
Antwort von Ephraim:
I was not even upset that they are taking fees, but HOW they do it.
Each course is entitled to a remuneration to its performance, is designed like this always synonymous. I just think it's terribly complicated, it is implemented as the. Because we really need to do a study, not only to come into conflict. The effort that you have to drive there can not afford even the small traders, let alone that he will get the approval for his project of an artist or composer, which indeed is necessary before the GEMA. And to see through the charging model of GEMA is synonymous not really easy.
Fact is: you have to use as a small production company, as one-or two-man show does not stand a chance bspw a song title of Madonna or the Rolling Stones legal in his film to be allowed. There is a very simple solution: siting your business in a country that the copyright agreement is not signed and you can roll any stones on Madonna ;-)
I once used a composition and the finished film with the assurance that it is reported, sent with the request for approval s.den composer, who lived in Spain. It was an alarming rate, as was the response: "He gave his consent. A priori, however, would not have it.
You're right with the effort, but "art needs sacrifice"
Antwort von Acer:
Moreover, one may quote from other works. I think there are five bars. Thank you all for the tips.
1.After Citation (Ephraim), I could only fit all 5 bars of a "wrong" sound, so the piece is abgwandelt interpreted in my own way and.
or:
2. In addition, one could even synonymous (is synonymous done better) from the orchestral scores of the Nutcracker own piano version, I would have my own GEMA's rights, right?
Acer
Antwort von mitchi:
Hi Acer,
Halbwissen much here in the contributions:
1. Once you updating with a OWN OWN interpretation, You create a new musical work with a so-called "own creative depth. In this work, then you are the author and not the PRS if you belong to, you can help and can do what you please.
2. If you can import the plant in OWN interpretation of one of the musicians, members of GEMA, GVL will report to you. This is the company for recovery of related rights, in which the musicians are organized, so the performers (not the author). Simple formula: GEMA GVL-free but taxable
3. A rule can freely use up to how many bars you music, there has never been and there is not synonymous today! This is a very old rumor, which remains stubbornly, but that is not correct.
3. To Ephraim: The PRS is not a perception but a rights collecting society. Deserve By the way: Not every author who wants money, it must strive to GEMA. I cast my music for years on their own (gema-free) and will be appropriately rewarded. And who does not want to pay GEMA fees is not necessarily a miser, but have (perhaps quite different legitimate reasons who knows the tariff jungle and the Honarorarstruktur GEMA, know what I mean).
4. So that you know, of whom comes all that: I make music for over 30 years, had now my fourth recording studio and currently distributes an extensive repertoire s.gemafreien titles.
Best wishes and good luck in the selecting of Music!
Uncle Joe
www.mastertracks.de
Antwort von Acer:
Well, a lot of little knowledge is better than nothing, right?;.)
Thank erstmal "guest" Joe, I'll remember everything.
Ciao,
Philip
Antwort von Maszie:
Found the information exactly right! Now stay open for me no more questions!
Just a pity that one of the master tracks "only" is normal sounds ... are there other vendors who Gema lizensrechtlich free and safe (providing for purchase) Music?
Look, I do music, reminds the same s.einen horror ...
Greeting Maszie
Antwort von WeiZen:
Moin,
here what is in the process Wave Hall Horror Trip
http://cgi.ebay.de/WAVE-HALL-Collection-GEMAFREI-auf-5-DVDs_W0QQitemZ5810137199QQcategoryZ31341QQcmdZViewItem
