Frage von Videofactory:
Hello,
hab
here
So I call a halt to life:
I'm synonymous in search of a Steadycam for HDR SR12.
Had there s.folgende thought:
Glidecam 2000 Pro
Steady Drive Double Action
ABC Handyman 100
ABC Handyman Clip & Go
Did I forget an important (and the Merlin is too expensive).
The Handyman's are not in the vertical axis are decoupled, it
is at a Glidecam or the steady part of a different drive (in that Glidecam claimed the Manufacturer Finally, she argues that all axes are decoupled).
Steadycam Which is recommended?
Where can I buy s.besten?
Thank you in advance in advance.
Gruß, Alex.
Antwort von jazzy_d:
So I voted for my HC3 (; + some accessories) a Glidecam 2000 (; now synonymous with jacket) and am very happy.
Antwort von pilskopf:
So I got me 1 month ago the Glidecam bought HD-1000 and can only say, well impressive. This has cost me ¬ 400 but worth every penny. She wears Cams to 1.5 kilos. Ich hab ne Sony HC9 with a Wide Angle Raynox HD5050 and it works Thereupon 1a. A vest is in no case with a total weight of 2 kilos is needed as long as you do not necessarily dauerthaft s.Stück wants to hold the camera. Moreover, porcine expensive, it looks like a Terminator and systems for light in any case necessary. In addition, one falls on order and it is bulky. I would never want to use. In severe Cam outweigh the 2.5 kilo clear. The counterweights are always about. My condition makes me a moment on film of 20 minutes I would appreciate, then I would really want to settle times. But I will of day to day. : D I train every day, shit on the Wii, which is much cooler. The Glidecam Hd-1000 is sexy without end because it is so small and so works well.
I would not take the 2000s but the HD version, it differs from a weight (the HD is easier), but above all of the fine adjustment only in the HD version via millimeter wheel can adjust. The 2000 pro is synonymous as far as I know for cams up to 2.5 kilos portable, which is used only when you need it, the HD-1000 is for less than 1.5 kilos Cams is the better choice. Any additional weight is at a Steadi fatal. This can very clearly s.laufen the more weight, the more severe will be a horizontal straight walk. So on s.ist and then to see, the less weight, the smoother the s.Ende. clear, we must synonymous run as smooth as possible. This is but with the time.
Here 2 examples of me and my system.
or the playlist http://www.youtube.com/profile_video_blog?user=pilpop
But from the second week, meanwhile, the turn so synonymous better, you have to really practice and understand the physics of how and what influences how and what to shoot, or hold.
There are more synonymous to find examples where I have used the Glidecam. I film for many years and s.dem day when I Steadi in my hand was indescribable, like a rebirth, it's a lot of fun to shoot, you can absorb the sudden things were not possible previously. The areas are much more versatile than synonymous with the merlin are twice as expensive. But you must know how the Glidecam work, there are already so incredibly bad videos, this is simply the fact that most people do not understand how to properly adjust and adjust the weights. Meanwhile, I have only seen a video and can say what the user has done wrong.
I hope I could help. In any case, a marvel of engineering. I would always Steadi me to buy again, never again.
And where you should buy, I think is unnecessary because in Germany the Glidecam only one vendor sells. Google helps. The gibts in the UK but less so with inch foundries. Wars are not worth me if a defect arises. But I must say, absolutely good quality and the HD-1000 provides geil aus. And incredibly small and portable, can be easily disassembled. Look at the simple times.
And I do not know what you mean with decouple but you can get the Cam synonymous spinning like a gyroscope that in all possible directions, you may need to be careful that the top bracket is not affected. You can keep it on the head, for example, if you lower the weight too easily, then you can permanently synonymous Cam on the head hold the cam so as to bottom pans thanks to gravity. This can very well hold quite low over the ground the film without it jerky. The Glidecam is just very, very versatile. Even after enduring the top film is not a problem, actually there is no perspective so that can not be achieved.
And it looks it.
Antwort von Videofactory:
Thank you for this detailed report.
The Glidecam HD 1000 seems the successor of the Glidecam 2000 to be.
Since both of their good experiences with Glidecam say, I think that the HD 1000 is right for me.
The whole thing lasts but probably until the end of May
@ pilskopf: If I have trouble austarieren I turn s.dich (if I may).
Meanwhile, I have only seen a video and can say what the user has done wrong. Ok, then you can perhaps tell me why the Picture
Antwort von jazzy_d:
Oscillation is called the bottom too much weight. It serves as a part of two hands but always synonymous.
Antwort von Fridu:
Hello
Interesting discussion. Have nachgeschaut and for my SonyEX1 with all around the 3 kilos I would Glidecam HD-4000. Question s.erfahrene users can sowas überhaupt noch need without jacket or is that too hard to handle? Because HD-4000 would be the price point of view or purchasable, the arm and the vest, on the other hand go into happig Money.
Grüsse of
Fridu
Antwort von pilskopf:
Hi, yes lol, the upper Vid is to shoot, of such reviews, I talked, I've already seen the synonymous and can not believe it, because I am still running without Glidecam better than with. And thanks Droptime is too much weight down to just who should be 2 seconds, may be synonymous 2.5 but I got in about 2 seconds prefer. Should just stop times. But the guy has unnecessary weight s.Board.
As the previous speaker has said, the bottom too much weight and he sums up with his sausage fingers on the bar below and far too coarse to. The is only with 2 fingers and fix it and rotate, but with feeling. About the rod will only pay attention that there is no imbalance may occur, and they must touch and a fine not coarse. Strange that he touched down too far you can see, because it is too jerky, this is only with violence. The only finger the ring below the pole brühren, otherwise it staggers, This is because, as is exactly where the center of the axis. Here is the place where you can touch the Steadi s.wenigsten out of balance can bring.
I help you at any time to adjust, I can explain to you exactly how you do it and what's important, everything is not that hard if you know that the whole thing just physics and gravity is.
You're really with the Steadi nothing wrong, you will in no time beautiful and smooth videos rotate. But beware when the wind blows, it will be difficult, as is the left hand to fix more.
Ich lad later to a small video for a bit to demonstrate how smooth so you can film.
The HD version of the Glidecam came out only this year, the most important thing is the fine, even 1mm rotation Einstellregler effect of a few degrees to the horizontal, which you can with the 2000 version never as precisely as with the HD version. That is, I think the biggest Vortschritt the Glidecam. Ne Glidecam HD-2000 gibts ja synonymous yet but I would only get if my cam with the equipment required. Well over 1.5 kilograms but eh I do not recommend. my cam with Wide Anglemüsste so weigh 900 grams and with Glidecam just under 2 kilos. This can work well.
edit to above: I would recommend a vest. This is too much weight, so you can not really long film but it is mainly on s.hüpfen and because the weight of every step of the cam moves downward, I can already tell you. I have in my 300g Cam times more raufgelegt, unbelievable the difference, if you stagger the run will be enormous, depending lighter the better. There are, however, so one arm for the Glidecam what the burden in his arms transfers, which makes the Weight but not better. Rather, I would indeed be a second, small cam and so a small Steadi guess so because you can achieve better results. And on average, cheaper and it is thus relatively inconspicuous.
I can easily Steadi keep in the air, then have 2.5 m (in my case) and Height can be used as a Kamerakran slow down the Cam, with his good Wide Angle Does the class.
Antwort von pilskopf:
Here, as promised a new video to the Glidecam Smooth a little clearer. And why there is no smiley? Crap. : D
Greeting
Antwort von jazzy_d:
Most will still more than Cam naked drauf. Mic, light, monitor, DoF, etc. FollowFocus
I did Austarieren on the 2000s with a cross sled solved.
And since the whole is based on inertia, the more mass or weight of the more stable will chose.
Antwort von pilskopf:
Yes, but the more you wobble in the horizontal and the arm falls somewhat. A vest is very expensive I think. Since I prefer to minimize my system.
Antwort von MacSeller:
So I got me 1 month ago the Glidecam bought HD-1000 and can only say, well impressive. This has cost me ¬ 400 but worth every penny. She wears Cams to 1.5 kilos. Ich hab ne Sony HC9 with a Wide Angle Raynox HD5050 and it works Thereupon 1a. A vest is in no case with a total weight of 2 kilos is needed as long as you do not necessarily dauerthaft s.Stück wants to hold the camera. Moreover, porcine expensive, it looks like a Terminator and systems for light in any case necessary. In addition, one falls on order and it is bulky. I would never want to use. In severe Cam outweigh the 2.5 kilo clear. The counterweights are always about. My condition makes me a moment on film of 20 minutes I would appreciate, then I would really want to settle times. But I will of day to day. : D I train every day, shit on the Wii, which is much cooler. The Glidecam Hd-1000 is sexy without end because it is so small and so works well.
I would not take the 2000s but the HD version, it differs from a weight (the HD is easier), but above all of the fine adjustment only in the HD version via millimeter wheel can adjust. The 2000 pro is synonymous as far as I know for cams up to 2.5 kilos portable, which is used only when you need it, the HD-1000 is for less than 1.5 kilos Cams is the better choice. Any additional weight is at a Steadi fatal. This can very clearly s.laufen the more weight, the more severe will be a horizontal straight walk. So on s.ist and then to see, the less weight, the smoother the s.Ende. clear, we must synonymous run as smooth as possible. This is but with the time.
Here 2 examples of me and my system.
or the playlist http://www.youtube.com/profile_video_blog?user=pilpop
But from the second week, meanwhile, the turn so synonymous better, you have to really practice and understand the physics of how and what influences how and what to shoot, or hold.
There are more synonymous to find examples where I have used the Glidecam. I film for many years and s.dem day when I Steadi in my hand was indescribable, like a rebirth, it's a lot of fun to shoot, you can absorb the sudden things were not possible previously. The areas are much more versatile than synonymous with the merlin are twice as expensive. But you must know how the Glidecam work, there are already so incredibly bad videos, this is simply the fact that most people do not understand how to properly adjust and adjust the weights. Meanwhile, I have only seen a video and can say what the user has done wrong.
I hope I could help. In any case, a marvel of engineering. I would always Steadi me to buy again, never again.
And where you should buy, I think is unnecessary because in Germany the Glidecam only one vendor sells. Google helps. The gibts in the UK but less so with inch foundries. Wars are not worth me if a defect arises. But I must say, absolutely good quality and the HD-1000 provides geil aus. And incredibly small and portable, can be easily disassembled. Look at the simple times.
And I do not know what you mean with decouple but you can get the Cam synonymous spinning like a gyroscope that in all possible directions, you may need to be careful that the top bracket is not affected. You can keep it on the head, for example, if you lower the weight too easily, then you can permanently synonymous Cam on the head hold the cam so as to bottom pans thanks to gravity. This can very well hold quite low over the ground the film without it jerky. The Glidecam is just very, very versatile. Even after enduring the top film is not a problem, actually there is no perspective so that can not be achieved.
And it looks it.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
...... Ich hab ne Sony HC9 with a Wide Angle Raynox HD5050 and it works Then 1a .............. I film for many years and s.dem day when I Steadi had in my hand, indescribable, like a rebirth, it's a lot of fun to shoot, you can absorb the sudden things were not possible previously. ......
;-)
Antwort von pilskopf:
...... Ich hab ne Sony HC9 with a Wide Angle Raynox HD5050 and it works Then 1a .............. I film for many years and s.dem day when I Steadi had in my hand, indescribable, like a rebirth, it's a lot of fun to shoot, you can absorb the sudden things were not possible previously. ......
;-)
So it's video editing program I still use the cheap Magix Video Deluxe 15th It can still be damn much change, thanks to imported synonymous Virtual Dub in the coloring of the material help which I mean not so much have done. Basically everything on the absolute low budget area. Evil is but my computer cut for 300 ¬. : D And I do this only as a hobby but I am against Money certainly synonymous rent. : D I have my rolls but otherwise otherwise deserve.
Antwort von pilskopf:
Maybe I can be a little more to encourage such a Steadi to buy so I'm smooth videos on Youtube may marvel. :)
The s.1 May I have a few days ago rotated.
Antwort von Dr.Müve:
Grade have the thread with interest wennich read and understand everything right would be the 1000 model for my Canon HV30 probably exactly the right one?
Antwort von pilskopf:
Grade have the thread with interest wennich read and understand everything right would be the 1000 model for my Canon HV30 probably exactly the right one?
Yes absolutely, you can then still a wide Angleund Microphone? if you want, just over 1.5 pounds may not be.
Antwort von krokymovie:
Grade have the thread with interest wennich read and understand everything right would be the 1000 model for my Canon HV30 probably exactly the right one?
the radio synonymous with the
jr
gruß
Antwort von pilskopf:
If the model is the Merlin - a too expensive and b is simply not so ultimately be used for all layers which ne Glidecam better coverage.
