Infoseite // Graphics for DVDs, in what Resolutionerstellen?



Frage von manni5548:


Hello,
if you eg menus or other graphics for films created, which will later on DVD and TV s.PC be considered, which I Resolutionerstellt her? Rich because 72dpi?

thanks
manni

Space


Antwort von Wiro:

Hello,
We once made some time ago a series of tests in order to clarify this matter in detail. The study tested graphics, fonts and photos as Menuhintergrund with respectively 75, 150 and 300 dpi.

Most have not seen any difference, some were of the opinion that a 150 dpi Stillimage had a slightly better coloration. At 300 dpi, no one could see a significant advantage.

Should you therefore have sleepless nights, then check it out in small test series of s.einer. This is s.besten still.
Gruss Wiro

Space


Antwort von Nightfly!:

Wiro to vote!

Apart from that, maybe something else interesting:

http://forum.slashcam.de/dvd-studio-pro-ubernimmt-bilder-falsch-of-photoshop-vt28604.html?highlight =

Gruß,
Nightfly!

Space


Antwort von AndyZZ:

"Wiro" wrote: Hello,
We once made some time ago a series of tests in order to clarify this matter in detail. The study tested graphics, fonts and photos as Menuhintergrund with respectively 75, 150 and 300 dpi.

Most have not seen any difference, some were of the opinion that a 150 dpi Stillimage had a slightly better coloration. At 300 dpi, no one could see a significant advantage.


If a picture one has Resolutionvon 1600x1200 px, then it plays no role, whether it's 72 dpi or 300 dpi. There remain halt 1600x1200 px. dpi means nothing more than dots per inch, ie pixels per inch (= 2.54 cm). Who has the time in Photoshop Resolutiongeändert of 72 dpi will be carried out at 300 dpi WITHOUT recalculate / interpolation s.Picture noticed no change. Only the printable size of changes in cm 56,4 cm x 42.3 cm (72 dpi)) to 13.5 cm x 10.1 cm (dpi at 300th

On the video we have only pixels, not inches. And since there are a maximum of 720x576 px halt, more does not work, or the picture is cropped.
Significantly, therefore, the dimensions of the image in pixels and not the Resolutionin dpi.

And you do not synonymous are the one Resolutionvon 720 dpi, but you count down the picture to 720px in width and 576 px in the Height.

Space


Antwort von manni5548:

Hello,
thanks for the many responses. I have read once thought to be in graphics, which are shown only s.Screen ranging generally 72dpi (because the monitor can not display anyway). Therefore, I have come to 72.

The problem is that I have here is a graph with rel. Small Text +'m fine lines. To 100%'s looks quite good, but if you look at the DVD s.PC in full screen is everything upscaled. Then ists halt scrap.

Can we do anything other hand, are fine lines or so taboo on principle!?

thanks again .. manni

Space


Antwort von mdb:

"manni5548" wrote: Can we do anything other hand, are fine lines or so taboo on principle!?
The line can not be finer than 1 pixel. At 720x576 pixels for the picture that is relatively thick, if others higher resolutions are used to. If the whole or displayed on a TV (interlaced), the line must be twice as thick, so it does not flicker. I always put a slight blur over it, it looks easy on TV better. Then man is in effect at 3-4 pixels width.

Space


Antwort von beiti:

I do not understand what is being discussed here. The dpi setting is a pure pressure standard for video and no preference for the matter.
For tube computer monitors always said that the illustrated Resolutionentspreche about 72 ppi (ie the monitor surface dissolve to 72 pixels per inch), but even that was not a precise value. With the File as such has nothing to do.

A PAL video image is always 720 x 576 pixels, no preference how big the monitor is. Because the video pixels are rectangular, you would get with a computer graphic of 720 x 576 pixel size slightly distorted (4:3) or highly distorted (16:9) results.
For this reason, I recommend to create graphics for 768 x 576 in 4:3 and 16:9 in 1024 for x 576th The "bruising" at 720 pixel width can accept the editing program.

Space


Antwort von Markus:

"manni5548" wrote: ... [...] Menus or other graphics for movies that are later on DVD and TV s.PC be considered ...
And a special feature of the TV, it is in the design of the menus and graphics into account: the overscan.

Related topic:
Video recordings [and graphics to video-resolution] see s.PC monitor not look good

Space


Antwort von PowerMac:

"beiti" wrote: I do not understand what is being discussed here. The dpi setting is a pure pressure standard for video and no preference for the matter.
For tube computer monitors always said that the illustrated Resolutionentspreche about 72 ppi (ie the monitor surface dissolve to 72 pixels per inch), but even that was not a precise value. With the File as such has nothing to do.

A PAL video image is always 720 x 576 pixels, no preference how big the monitor is. Because the video pixels are rectangular, you would get with a computer graphic of 720 x 576 pixel size slightly distorted (4:3) or highly distorted (16:9) results.
For this reason, I recommend to create graphics for 768 x 576 in 4:3 and 16:9 in 1024 for x 576th The "bruising" at 720 pixel width can accept the editing program.


I Agree. dpi is s.The Resolutiongebunden. Video in PAL is via Resolutiondefiniert, not about dpi. It is perhaps interesting for DTP, but not for video.

Space



Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash