Newsmeldung von slashCAM: Grossfernseher: Plasma or LCD? Of thomas - 21 Aug 2006 11:51:00 Interesting article about the struggle of two different technologies for supremacy for Großfernseher: Plasma and LCD. Until recently, large, flat monitors were mostly plasma TV. But since LCDs are synonymous produced in large formats, losing s.Boden plasma screens. A fundamental problem of plasma screens is the so-called "burn-in", ie an image content for a long time s.der remains unchanged s.der same place, then "burn" the leaves on one screen and tracks. Moreover, they are sensitive to temperature and Ortwechsel and have set a short life than LCD screens - Sonyhat therefore the production of Plasmagerä ¤ ten. The producers of the other Plasmabildschimen hope to the problems of the plasma technology to improve soon.
Antwort von Markus:
A fundamental problem of plasma screens is the so-called "burn-in" ...
... and have a low life than LCD screens ... This applies to CRT TVs as well, so I do not find these arguments very convincing to buy an LCD TV. When I set out a year ago, I compared the technologies and concluded that high plasma devices at this time the team had the front. So I bought a current plasma TVs (Panasonic), without the then very popular 480 - Pixel Height. I did not regretted to this day synonymous.
On the other hand I assume that the device will not be here forever and be in no later than 10 years, a new (SED) Model ago that consumes less power, has a built-in hard drive recorder for direct recording, know what I want to see ...
Antwort von oliver II:
... must be in no more than 10 years, a new (SED) model here, ... What is it? The SED has not obsolete in 17 years?
Who knows what I want to see ... ... And regardless of television shows synonymous, what I want to see!
Antwort von Markus:
What is it? The SED has not obsolete in 17 years? Everything comes back. Hopefully not only political. ;-)
See synonymous:
In the new federal states, there were 30 years ago already SED TV Seriously
