What to get out there? Of course, it is consistently sharp. (if the Auflagemaß agrees).
Z7, S270, HPX-200.
Antwort von B.DeKid:
Nonsense, can garnicht remain sharp.
He says so in the manual setting / Focus.
How do you ask Joguhrt beautiful A cup in 10m distance where I am now purely zoom - sharp point - and then to zoom out (WW) will still be sharp?
Or. Who can because the writing on the cup from 10m distance as sharp or blurred defined?
Besides what you see the promise of a target chen test?
Something of the MF PushAV heard?
MfG B. DeKid
Antwort von WideScreen:
Of course without autofocus. Schatzi Ähhh but this is normal procedure. Ranzoomen, Sharpen, Set picture. Thus never had problems? Synonymous understand the question is not why it should be ....
Antwort von ruessel:
My two XHA1 "s" is at 4 meters wide in Angleca. 40-50cm off the mark.
Antwort von WideScreen:
"trunk" wrote:
My two XHA1 "s" is at 4 meters wide in Angleca. 40-50cm off the mark.
Although you have set Auflagemaß?
Habs tested again, because nothing can be determined. Not even on his external HD monitor .....
Antwort von ruessel:
Quote:
Although you have set Auflagemaß?
how do you want at a Auflagemaß adjust the XHA1?
Antwort von WideScreen:
White ned not know the thing.
Can not? Well it surprised me not synonymous.
Antwort von bgk:
I can see: So clearly, as some people think that the matter should probably not be as synonymous, the above contributions show.
One group says "Can not go," the other "Is not a problem." That's why I had opened the thread - to find out what cameras at one or the other case.
Regards, BGK
Antwort von marwie:
The question is halt, Lens parfokal whether or not, the better are the most rare.
Antwort von bgk:
"marwie" wrote:
The question is halt, Lens parfokal whether or not, the better are the most rare.
Yes, that is correct synonymous. (Among others) for the HD-tiny discover meaning and purpose would this thread (with SD cameras, the phenomenon occurs even for beginners products is unlikely to).
It would be synonymous actually not really difficult, its oh so great, despite the megapixel, high resolution, sharp crack, sündhaftteure, CA-free, light-and standorterkennende camera on, the above test and then lines like the following post:
"In my Camera (xy type) do I get the following result: Close range (5-10m): blur after Zoom (clearly visible) Distant (100m +): sharpness is maintained "
Or like ... More would not be necessary. But it is rather surprising that one of cameras that you do not even know the Auflagemass can not adjust ...
Man man man I do not think that for all the ProAm here is such a challenge would be.
Thanks but s.ruessel, which is currently still only meaningful contribution relating to.
Antwort von kalle70:
My old sweetie TRV900E makes it so:
Sharpness is retained.
Antwort von WideScreen:
"WideScreen" wrote:
Of course, it is consistently sharp. (if the Auflagemaß agrees).
Z7, S270, HPX-200.
Who can read is a clear advantage, BGK
But perhaps this is s.der form, that is again:
When I SonyZ7 Camera, S270 and Panasonic HPX200, I come to the conclusion that: Close range (5-10m): Focus is retained Distant (100m +): Focus is retained
Antwort von bgk:
Sorry WideScreen, the first response to me was lost. Thank you for this course, synonymous.
The fact that the good old TRV900 new catcher this high resolution image with ease in the bag is, it was clear. It does that because with "something" less Resolutionauch a little easier. ;-)
If now the consumer HD - Group participates, it will be a thrilling thing. Interestingly, this phenomenon is hardly mentioned in tests.
Thank you, but sometimes for your feedback.
Regards, BGK
Antwort von WideScreen:
BGK Sorry but for me it is synonymous something new, draum my astonishment. And I assumed that all the cameras which have synonymous optics Exchangable the Auflagemaß can. The Canon can not, I was very surprised, and therefore of no surprise me contain the schärfe Is.
Bin Easter with friends as much HD Consumer dinger have, there will be time to test and report back here:)
Antwort von bgk:
"WideScreen" wrote:
BGK Sorry but for me it is synonymous something new, draum my astonishment.
I was pretty irritated synonymous when I first saw - especially as the synonymous in the tests of specialized magazines, websites and forums will not be discussed.
"WideScreen" wrote:
Bin Easter with friends as much HD Consumer dinger have, there will be time to test and report back here:)
Super, I'm already curious to see what will come out.
Regards, BGK
Antwort von bgk:
Hello WideScreen,
"WideScreen" wrote:
Bin Easter with friends as much HD Consumer dinger have, there will be time to test and report back here:)
Easter is around the eggs (hopefully) be found - there is new evidence of you?
Regards, BGK
Antwort von domain:
There is probably more generally of the opinion that a change in focal length lens with a car over the entire area can hold the sharpness. That is absolutely not the case. With the slightest change in focal length by moving a lens group immediately runs the sharpness massively out of hand if not also by a second movable lens group as well as possible would be corrected. For zoom lenses, the older by Höcht precise control curves, milled in the most durable abrasion-resistant materials herbei run. All are modern, electronical zoom lenses are no longer controlled, so you totally numerical precision of the stored control curves and the exporting actuators depends. In short, the situation has fundamentally changed and all the focus back attempts are no longer what they once were.
