HDC-TM900 (SD909 etc.): small Schaerfeleistung at Aperture 4?
Frage von Schwermetall: Februar 2012
Hello, \u003cbr /\u003e I bought the Panasonic HDC-TM900 and have a few questions a.Capable practitioners and users the TM900 and SD909 or similar stock. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I tested the Objectively in a variety of focal lengths, with different apertures. It occurred to me the following. \u003cbr /\u003e The best image quality, the Objectively the range from 5.6 - 8 \u003cbr /\u003e That's as far as normal. \u003cbr /\u003e Likewise, it is normal that the sharpness subsides the further opening or closing, with the sharpness in Aperture 2.8, I - would call still open as well. \u003cbr /\u003e What I do find strange is that the sharpness in Aperture 4 subsides significantly. \u003cbr /\u003e It is usually worse than Aperture 11! \u003cbr /\u003e This effect can be observed at all focal lengths. \u003cbr /\u003e Is synonymous with you like that? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Then there are
Antwort von Tiefflieger:
I have the TM 900 and of an open aperture to f8 no losses. \u003cbr /\u003e In very good f11, f16 and still good about it much at the Beugungsunschaerfe BEGINS. \u003cbr /\u003e At what distance you film your subject? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Otherwise I would leave everything to 0 for testing (sharpness, color, etc.) \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Greetings low-flying aircraft
Antwort von penkeler:
\u003cspan style=\
Antwort von Schwermetall:
Hello and thank you before. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I'm at distances of 1 - 15m was filmed and the blurring at all Distances. \u003cbr /\u003e Not that you understand me wrong, the blur is noKatastrophe, but it's funny, when the image is blurred at 4 and Aperture 2.8. \u003cbr /\u003e Otherwise I am extremely impressed of the picture quality! \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e As far as the general picture settings, \u003cbr /\u003e who chooses her like that? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e The sharpness I'm currently at -5, because otherwise at low light (12 - 18db), the synonymous Bildstoerungen be strengthened. \u003cbr /\u003e The sharpness I wanted to set about working in the USM. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Furthermore, I had the feeling that at least have in the artificially Gelbtoene a slight green cast. \u003cbr /\u003e The white balance I've played in all variants. \u003cbr /\u003e The
Antwort von Tiefflieger:
First of all, \u003cbr /\u003e I have, I find a bracketing the Beugungsunschaerfe, or control Randschaerfe made. \u003cbr /\u003e It is not professionally exposed and not the same, but enough for me. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e I do not have any f-stop values \u200b\u200bare published and the pictures are about half the original size. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e http://forum.slashcam.de/viewtopic.php?p=517544 # 517 544 \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Tomorrow night else can I hope to have another full-size here (click on). \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Greetings low-flying aircraft
