The cam is completely new to the market, test results, I found no previously been available only a few days, and I have as a supplement in my "fleet" ordered the thing on 400 (but is not there yet). \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Now I read on Amazon several very fresh assessment: good image, but all unit Laufgeraeusche, all buyers and send the thing back again. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Can it be that Sony brings out such a bad design? \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e here the link to Amazon:
Antwort von Bernd E.:
If you've already ordered the camera on, then do their own image a.besten. Such "problems" (just think about the debate a.Capable Luefter at Panasonic!) Are often highly subjective, and what makes one crazy, disturbs the other not at all. Comments on Amazon would in any case pretty much the last thing I do is to scale would, because as synonymous written many strange: sometimes only ignorance, but sometimes synonymous specifically, to bring products into disrepute. If the CX250, but actually has a Geraeuschproblem, then it should soon have more reports to be synonymous elsewhere, especially since in fact the other models of this camcorder family would be affected as well.
Antwort von Jan:
Hello, \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e usually it sounds very much like a Rufkampagne, especially when you consider that it is a video camera Sonyum pioneer. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e But so many negative reviews can lie low. I have the camera still not there, spaetenstens next week I will retest times. \u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e VG \u003cbr /\u003e January