Frage von Aljoscha.Niko:
Hi!
so, so I understand this is still not quite: Suppose
das hierthis focus? Or lose the video and subsequently by the capture in SD s.qualität and ultimately provides
Antwort von Wiro:
Hello,
if you get the camcorder to SD output switch it behaves exactly like a normal SD camcorder and gives the video as DV-PAL 720x576 widescreen PAR from 1.422. So just as capturn and edit as if you have an SD widescreen camcorder did depend on it.
The image corresponds to the experience of an upper-class video.
Gruss Wiro
Antwort von Aljoscha.Niko:
So it loses Sogut no quality? You have the whole thing so imagine how in Photoshop: you open a picture with a size of 1920x1080. Then it was scaled down to 856x480, the video will be sharper, because the contours will shrink, as it is synonymous with VirtualDub or similar (I tried ...). And it's my uncertainty as to whether the camcorder through the SD runterkonvertieren of 1080i to 576i (1024x576 16:9, 720x576 4:3) the video with a certain unschärfe dirty, or a visible quality loss occurs ... What do you among upper class camera? SonyVX-2000? Pana GS500? So they really only loses a little quali?
Antwort von Wiro:
I personally believe JVC GY-DV 5000 and SonyVX-9000.
Cameras were compared with HC-1 and the FX-1. FX-1 seems to us an idea in more detail in the presentation.
Gruss Wiro
Antwort von Aljoscha.Niko:
it would then be a more useful of these supercams á la VX9000 to buy (which is no longer there, right?)? Because it is cheaper (and more useful?), Such a HDV camcorder for around 900 ¬ to fetch, and then herunterzukonvertieren, and original bands on the material to have hd, right? Or pick VX2100 (which I am a little synonymous ... verguckt)?
(:
MfG
Antwort von Wiro:
... and then herunterzukonvertieren, and original bands on the material to have hd This approach is more and more, because then the only source material available is high-resolution times. What makes it so that it is from existing equipment dependent.
However, lags Your Comparison with the 900-euro-HDV something. There are synonymous because cheap, good and very good models. You must have because the relations are not naive and think.
Gruss Wiro
Antwort von Axel:
You must have because the relations are not naive and think. And:
Or lose the video and subsequently by the capture in SD s.qualität and finally looks like a video from the "cheap consumer camcorder" from? The example picture, in whatever resolution and stupid from a loveless video
recording because of the blatant over-exposure. The complement to WIROS quote: It is naive, quality s.der Resolutionzu measured. With an SD Einchipper with ND filter and manual exposure control would be a better picture than have been possible in the first example.
Antwort von Aljoscha.Niko:
Ok. But with my GS80 I reach but certainly not as skilled of a runterkonvertierten SonyHC3 or what? ich hab ne synonymous lens hood and a ND filter and expose themselves synonymous Or would einstieg than in the somewhat gehobenere camcorder type A Pana GS500 very suitable? There is so synonymous quite cheap, and gets - as far as I understand it - the maximum s.qualität out as in DV-PAL is feasible?
Antwort von Axel:
CMOS chips have in any event properties, which they distinguish ordinary CCD Einchipper (In Lowlight could 1 CCD increasingly eroded by the colors unmask). If you have the HC3, however, directly compare with the HV20 is a better picture of the latter, and I doubt whether the only s.der higher Resolutionliegt.
Generally - the warning against naïve consideration - is a downkonvertiertes Picture better than a native SD Picture.
Antwort von Aljoscha.Niko:
... What do you among upper class camera? ... I personally believe JVC GY-DV 5000 and SonyVX-9000 ... naja, das is doch schon Sogut like or HDV? ;)
PS: Is it possible for the Canon HV10 synonymous the output switch to SD, or can be in any HDV camcorder?
edit: I could go down with a video about
Antwort von scream:
PS: Is it possible for the Canon HV10 synonymous spending on SD switch
Yes.
or you can at any HDV camcorder?
Believe it.
Antwort von Kollektor:
Is the output HDV -> SD always an anamorphic 16:9 picture?
Antwort von Markus:
Normally yes, but some camcorders can be synonymous to 4:3 output switch (eg SonyV1).
Antwort von Kollektor:
Thanks Mark!
Most HDV camcorders deliver the SD Downconverting a worse result than if the same in SD Resolutionfilmt. Remedy would be a Herunterrechnen with a suitable editing program. My Premiere 6.5 can not. Are there any stand-alone programs (maybe even freeware) which can in high quality?
I am a synonymous of whom do not know in what format they should take in future. With HDV is a new projector, a new television and a new computer, given the price to play for the camera is almost a secondary role. Intermediate solution would be a down conversion. Or maybe once again a good SD camera like the VX2100, which is currently very cheap there. But has no real 16:9, for TOP-Low Light properties compared with a FX7. Or maybe a cheap GS500 as an interim solution? They liked me but the manual is not possible, especially on good sound, I set great value.
So I will create 2 a.m. to 3 p.m. films (documentaries) per year and do it publicly before, I get money for not only applause. A couple of smaller industrial documentaries. I would HDV Camera to buy if I do not have other disadvantages compared to a VX2100 and would only later the HDV Vorführequipment purchase.
Antwort von mauriceg@gmx.de:
... Most HDV camcorders deliver the SD Downconverting a worse result than if the same in SD Resolutionfilmt ... I thought exactly the same way, it's NOT?
Antwort von Wiro:
Most HDV camcorders deliver the SD Downconverting a worse result than if the same in SD Resolutionfilmt No, the opposite is the case.
Our comparisons showed that video, the camera internally Wide downscaled to DV was a good DV camera are equal. Comparison HDV cameras, the devices SonyFX-1 and SonyHC-1 versus Sony and JVC-9000-5000 (no measurements, but a vision test on canvas).
The advantage is that the first footage in HDV has available. What makes it so that it is an entirely different matter. Either only times in DV output and a "normal" DV-cut film, or - if the equipment is available - in HDV and cut spending.
Gruss Wiro
Antwort von Kollektor:
Thanks for the info. I am a little confused by contributions from various media, writes about www.film-tv-video.de on the Sony HVR-A1:
Are you with the A1 down-converted image signals, then one has in many cases s.dem camcorder no joy right: There are strong artifacts, flickering edges and moiré effects. The integrated signal converter functionality should be from the perspective of the tester really only for the temporary use of playback. I had this camcorder for its small size, its low price and its excellent Audio (even XLR connectors) are viewed, the picture looked good as long as synonymous enough light was available. Moreover, it may even DVCAM and is thus a good bridge to the old DVCAM recordings dar.
But if the other camcorders Downconverting worked well, that would be a real alternative for me. I do flirt with the FX7.
