Frage von Frank B.:
Hi Folks,
I've been listening to my normal recordings desktop - I use computer speakers, with their sound but no longer satisfied. Now is indeed everywhere, the monitor speakers on professional audio monitor speakers favored. Since my post about the s.and Nächtens do with me at home, and want to sleep one floor below my office, my family alone, I think a good alternative to headphones. Are there any of you experience with headphones for listening to video sound, what should I pay particular attention to the purchase, or would you advise of headphones in general?
Greetings from Frank B.
Antwort von Nightfly!:
Hello Frank B
Comparison of computer speakers you'll probably in the area with stereo headphones make a quantum leap to make (at least with good Sennheiser headphones for example).
At 5.1 (etc) sound, the sound comes in the room (with speaker system) I think over better. However, this is of course not be family friendly!
Greeting
Nightfly.
Antwort von Keff:
Phew - there's something to note. If you you high-end grow boxes, you come in 5-digit euro area. The whole course makes sense only if your work is synonymous according furnished or furnished. True, of course, are more expensive speakers in studios in question. It is important that the room was so much reverb and echo "swallows" as possible. Who wants to afford that? They are relatively small, have many corners with corrugated walls and Did, flat ceilings, carpeting, etc. ..
The workaround, if you grow you Headphones. Because even get S.200 - very official results.
It would be interesting synonymous with which you are capturing. If you are working with SQN in the post makes sense certainly one Peakmeter synonymous. You cut digitally, there are eg in Premiere already own Peakmeter ...
As always synonymous. I'm moving Headphones for cost reasons.
Greeting
Keff
Antwort von Markus:
Hi All,
I have both headphones as synonymous studio monitors. Actually, I prefer to work with the monitors, because I find it tiring to wear for hours on a header phones. As regards the price, I agree to Keff. Really good monitors (eg
Antwort von Blackeagle123:
Hello, why studio monitors are so expensive?
Do not synonymous normal good as Dolby Digital (5.1) speakers?
I'm using 5.1 speakers, with some videos synonymous only stereo (depending on the film, which I do, whether from Dolby's surround, or not).
The boxes were very expensive. Stereo speakers have cost over 1,000 ¬. There are no special studio monitors, but boxing a good stereo hi-fi system! Are not as good as the studio monitors?
Love Greetings
Constantin
Antwort von Markus:
Hi Constantin,
KRK V4, the cost per unit ¬ 300, in pairs or 600 ¬. Why are these boxes are so expensive is with the play-along features. As is often seen on a linear frequency response - just as with microphones synonymous.
Antwort von mdb:
In assessing the effect of mixes I have, I'm listening with headphones analytically. For example, in relation to this atmosphere, if I with the headphones (Sennheiser HD25) the relationship is good then I have too lightly on the big speakers (Spendor M50ARD) the atmosphere, and then I hear the piece in the show on my television at home, the atmosphere is barely audible.
Antwort von rtzbild:
Hi Constantin,
KRK V4, the cost per unit ¬ 300, in pairs or 600 ¬. Why are these boxes are so expensive is with the play-along features. As is often seen on a linear frequency response - just as with microphones synonymous. Hi Mark,
what is of monitors such as the JBL Control One hold?
Gruß Olli
Antwort von prem:
Thank you for the first time useful information.
Once again, the short explanation: I'm out and torn between a relatively inexpensive listening monitors (eg ESI near 05, which should be very good for the price of about 190 Euro / pair Street) and cheap but good headphones. This should not cost more than $ 100 and provide a best possible price performance ratio. Against the monitors just talking, that they disturbed during the night work. These come with me but still relatively rare that this disorder should not necessarily be decisive if it should be clearly superior to monitor speakers headphones. I can see from your statements, but not unique. The argument against Headphones, which is employed s.meisten me after reading your posts, that it possibly could be burdensome to have them for a long time on the head. So you need to play good values, the highest possible wearing comfort are synonymous. Do you have any tips to max. $ 100?
friendly greetings Frank
Antwort von Markus:
... what's the matter of monitors such as the JBL Control One hold? Hello Olli,
I had at
Schmidt Music
The JBL Control Now I would not like optical. Who can say something about the sound quality? (; I could speculate at best).
Antwort von chillhorst:
Hi Frank B.
you're looking for something for around 100 ¬. Because I would really advise you on your headphones, because the price / performance ratio is simply better because
(http://www.musik-produktiv.de/shop/Artikelliste.aspx?wg_gruppe_id=16855&ag_gruppe_id=16964&ob_gruppe_id=17547&sort=preis_asc) Another point is that you get for 100 synonymous and 200 ¬ for no really good monitor speakers. The "cheapest", which was synonymous any good, are the monitors of CRC, and although the "Rokit G2" series. The 5 "speakers cost 169 ¬ per piece and provide a very linear sound.
Studio monitors add itself only makes sense when you mix music and sound edited. If you really want to watch movies or just wants to enjoy his music, these monitors is not the right choice, because it is synonymous with boxing for less money is a good sound. He is then not balanced / linear (some frequencies are a bit louder than others). A surround system can therefore not be compared synonymous with listening monitors, because the 5.1 speakers are only "nice / good" and not on sound from linearity.
Antwort von Axel:
@ chill horst.
B. If Frank has been waiting four years for the next posting, to limit his decision, he is like the
perfume of Patrick Süsskind described in
The Tick: to be able to remain motionless for years, waiting for a moment, - which is synonymous life.
Antwort von K.-D. Schmidt:
As already mentioned: the mix of atmosphere and this may sound in the headphones quite different on the monitors and then again other than via the built-in TV speakers.
You should probably superior, they were intended for your movies:
for yourself and your TV? Then the mixture with the TV check, for as it should s.besten sound.
for distribution and playback on different TV sets? Then I would check with the TV monitor and sound.
for playback on surround systems? Then just check with monitor and / or surround system.
Greeting
KDS
Antwort von Frank B.:
Oh, there has been dug up my ollen thread!. Power, but nothing that the theme is always current.
In almost 4 years has done a lot for me, of course, in this direction.
First off: I see myself as an amateur video, with growing demands s.mich itself the most important factors that are limiting me in the pursuit of my hobby time constraints and lack of money, certainly in many other Hobbyfilmern synonymous.
With professionals, I can not measure me, neither of the effort here, nor the outcome. The budget is always very limited. Hence please do not laugh if I make known to you finally made my choice:
In the pits, I have decided on the Behringer Truth B2031A. I could hear them in a big house music to other monitors in this price category in Comparison. In my opinion they have a very good price-performance ratio. Clearly there were better speakers for much more money - least twice as much.
When headphones it is a SonyMDR-XD become 100th So I'm considerably less than my budget of 100, - Euro. In the lyrics I could hear no or very little difference to more expensive handsets of Sennheiser or Beyerdynamic.
The decision is now already more than three years back. Today, s.Markt safe again done a lot, but I am still very happy with my decisions.
Frank
