Infoseite // How it plans to your script?



Frage von first_script:


Hello
How it plans to actually use the script, I think is now really only matters which can then finally be synonymous drinnstehen-with treatment and exposé, synonymous or very different?
For me the fall with the summary of my story so very difficult (eg Treatment)

glg

Space


Antwort von PowerMac:

Idea -> Forgot idea -> idea aufgeifen -> thoughts down -> down narrow concept -> with friends bereden -> refine -> to the proposal, the night at 2 in the half has been added, add -> Treatment write -> write script -- > constantly visually and through third-party open to suggestions remain

Space


Antwort von Axel:

"first_script" wrote: For me the fall with the summary of my story so very difficult (eg Treatment)

I have ideas for specific situations, not for entire plot. The most effective, it is perhaps a co-author to find the one to keep track. Many ideas revealed zusammengepappt usually not a good Plotlinie. For couples, it is easier to ideas from the given structure or to develop a framework of ideas to knead. Enthusiastic Yes Sager are not suitable, rather a clever no-Sager.

Alone must it be a bit schizophrenic. One casual associate ( "brainstorming"), the other meticulous and disciplined and write down everything (in-) group. The best analogy to the browser / Project Window / SuperBin: Rein with all the raw materials. Another day rested and skeptical views and in the timeline (the script) draw. Treat your ideas as if they were ready for the raw material of another, because any foreign material is easier to assess one's (What is this merely Verbinski Quark thought?).

Accumulate material and edit the other one. These are two activities that are in the way and are therefore in the correct order and with distance to be done.

Space


Antwort von Schleichmichel:

Searching is still lacking.

In any case, I first write the story in prose, then I am with the sequences and settings. Then come new ideas, or just finds something that does not work. Then again, the text will be amended and considered. Then re-edited sequences in detail, and then sometime synonymous over the image charge and grabs his visual dictionary.

With the sound engineer you will usually be that much better on the acoustic channel of the film to distribute it again ... the story changed and then the details .....

Then you all too much happen and designed erstmal You lay a break and do "what I know what" ... at the zoo or go look at the library, pick you a book out, what do you really want, or you walk with eyes on a bookshelf at random and take out a book and reads until 30th Page If you are not packed until then has put it back. Perhaps somewhere a entscheidner of her imagination, which you arrange for the Project to change / leave / destroy ...

Seriously. This is a process in which everyone must cope. If you do not mind, then at least the people watching and reading as books about human behavior and perception psychology. Finally, do you indeed for the people movies, and it is not a bad idea to people with bets.

Small s.Ende Tip: Do not bullshit:)

Space


Antwort von DWUA:

@ First_script

The following way of working has always worked well.
(Not just for film-makers; synonymous for books):

1. The overview
You work like an architect.
This means that you draw of a real hand, a large map with all
what a house it belongs. All side by side, or different
Floor plans for other floors (levels).
The different rooms would leave a corresponding content.

2. The interconnection
Now you can pave the way (the way) to drive you want to scroll through lines, characterizing synonymous with color, highlight.
This will give you clear "shortcuts" in order.

3. The details
Better: Many, many and even more details from your "brain-storming" fundus are categorized as follows:
Whether by numbers, letters, or color, etc. in your HOUSE
labeled, you can find them in a file box.
Regardless of the computer you save the information about characters, locations, information on options for
the rotation, etc., on file cards, which you can improve it.

This all sounds complicated at first and "stale", but is Usus
Many professionals in the film and the writing arts.

It is no preference to what genre, what genre it is!
It works with nature documentaries, film, satire, mystery, etc. .... alike.

This is a "skeleton".
The computer, you should only turn on when it is without him
absolutely no longer goes on:))

Sincerely,
DWUA

Space


Antwort von DWUA:

@ First_script

The following way of working has always worked well.
(Not just for film-makers; synonymous for books):

1. The overview
You work like an architect.
This means that you draw of a real hand, a large map with all
what a house it belongs. All side by side, or different
Floor plans for other floors (levels).
The different rooms would leave a corresponding content.

2. The interconnection
Now you can pave the way (the way) to drive you want to scroll through lines, characterizing synonymous with color, highlight.
This will give you clear "shortcuts" in order.

3. The details
Better: Many, many and even more details from your "brain-storming" fundus are categorized as follows:
Whether by numbers, letters, or color, etc. in your HOUSE
labeled, you can find them in a file box.
Regardless of the computer you save the information about characters, locations, information on options for
the rotation, etc., on file cards, which you can improve it.

This all sounds complicated at first and "stale", but is Usus
Many professionals in the film and the writing arts.

It is no preference to what genre, what genre it is!
It works with nature documentaries, film, satire, mystery, etc. .... alike.

This is a "skeleton".
The computer, you should only turn on when it is without him
absolutely no longer goes on:))

Sincerely,
DWUA

Space


Antwort von DWUA:

@ Admin

For the "double Lottchen" we apologize!
This was concluded, because (although "logged in") when you click "send" an error message appeared:
"FAILED ...."
or
"... Try again ..."

Our excuse is so so late, because we mistake
first with us and not for other search.
After the most recent "Luke Filewalker" his search without
Finds has finished, we assume that we are not of the
intended "faux pas" is not synonymous of us comes from.

Cordial; / greetings
DWUA

Space


Antwort von PowerMac:

Delete contribution.

Space


Antwort von Axel:

"DWUA" wrote: You draw hands of a real, great plan with everything in a house it belongs. [... ]
The computer, you should only turn on when it is without him
absolutely no longer goes on:))


I find synonymous. It is this advantage of the computer, all at the same time accurately, but synonymous revoked is to have in the first phase, while observing the Blubberns from the subconscious, a huge disadvantage. A sketch must be exactly the reverse graphical content and formal and vague hingerotzt be virtually always ready to "morph", but it must be a real object, something that flash through your mind to a potential element of your story, or be banished. It has so much self-substance that you can delete it completely, but not corners and edges smooth etch.

But synonymous in the second phase, which apparently accounts Managing brilliant epiphanies, harms the unlimited undo s.einem computer (copy & paste, various versions of secure, etc.) more than it benefits.

After editing, no preference of whether a Plotline or a video timeline is not a logical process that the creativity of the inventor only managed! It is an equally creative and intuitive process. The first spontaneously precipitated decision may / should be questioned, but instead of tinkering to do's for keeping or deleting decide.

The experiment in the non-linear, non-destructive world of computer editing leading to formally perfect and totally uninteresting results.

At the typewriter writers have always synonymous renewed by hand or scenes converted. But only to a certain extent. Eventually, they have completely and started ahead of the previous version no longer angeguckt. This is creative and destructive letter!

Space



Space


Antwort von Ludwig 07:

First many thanks for your very elaborate answer largely -

I have now manually all the acts of my story and I recorded at a fairly intuitive conclusion. I now know not only how closely the "red thread" should be run (just the plotpoints etc.) where it is synonymous but s.besten negotiations would be the next developments.
That is what I have done by and I am only on the core (it is a crime) have been focused and only later to have respected the rest. synonymous surprising that very many good ideas only come when I visualize the whole then I have seen before-a key scene for example was still about!

glg

Space


Antwort von rtzbild:

"DWUA" wrote: @ Admin
For the "double Lottchen" we apologize!


Ref2: PowerMac:
Could be that the contribution is never clear if it was answered.

But no preference, go into the edit and delete just the text.
Then, only the header without body text.

LG Olli

Space


Antwort von DWUA:

@ rtzbild

Thanks for your tip!
ps:
Can it be that your multiple order (windbreak canopies)
already sold out?
In the Mongolia?
Where the wind whistles often genuinely mercilessly!

@ First_script

For your topic:

A script you have only when you using your
Druckerei> 100 copies (1st edition) which have to be "distributed".

1. To whom, for whom?
2. Order? "With" is good. "Without" is bad. Unless your film
is something very unusual.

But Sch (m) ore aside;))
So we stay on the ground of facts.
Your question about a script so far has not been answered,
that it is synonymous as "readable" should be.
Not only for yourself, but synonymous for producers, directors, actors, set designers, props, makeup, etc. ....

Even then, if you prefer to do everything yourself want, you should
"think big".

Has never harmed anyone.
After "script-design" you have not asked.

All the best
DWUA


[/ u]

Space


Antwort von Ludwig 07:

Do not forget:

Write, write, write.

In no case (!) Describe things, as long as you're not with the first draft did. If you have ne idea that you just at the moment for haelen better, write a second alternative of the First LOW.
But do never, never, never in the running process. This all times had a purpose, and your "improved" version reads better, but is perhaps a little aside, what at first was still there. This first version - so bad they may be synonymous - could (should not) you always return to the basic idea back.

Writing is primarily Umschriben. Weis is not what I did was think Fields or Oliver Schütte. It is synonymous my Liebligs Hemmingway quote: The first draft is always shit! So no fear of failure, which is one of them. If thou after the first draft of opinion are only minor details need to rotate, are you with security on the boardwalk.

Lieben Gruß, Christian

Space


Antwort von DWUA:

@ Christian

Holzwege?
Which there are many!

Eventually, however, is closing it. Otherwise, you stay in a swamp
hang. Eventually a decision is due.

There are film makers who are very eager,
New to try to limit any s.die
Script to go. That is so.

Werner Herzog / Klaus Kinski with "Aquirre, the wrath of God", and other Herzog / Kinski passions are probably enough of testimony,
that in extreme situations when filming on location the script
completely "cold" is.

But the film itself is still the result of a screenplay!

And nobody came up with the idea, the idea is not to achieve
can ...

;))
DWUA

DWUA

Space


Antwort von Axel:

"Fernand Léger" wrote: The error of the film is the script.

A provocative statement. I would it for me (ie without any claim to validity for others) as translated: There is a "Writers Block", before loudly when doubts about the flawlessness of the already written this when writing repeatedly Edits (Christian, on the other hand has already betrayed a recipe "Write, write, write. In no case (!) describe things, as long as you're not with the first draft of art.").

Such a blockade is to me synonymous with the rotation and the cutting is not known. Here you can see the hurdles and opportunities of the reality and uses them, whether for good or bad.

Therefore the script does not waste too much energy on details that give a clear line. Keep up to speed with not linguistically delightful descriptions or instructions to write and place and time dialogs. Do this, as DWUA write with regard to some attractive and readable form, more a question of layout as the content.

When you consider turning the script rather than a starting point and less than complete your work in offline format. A script is used to present the reality of new ideas and supplemented increases to be exceeded.
[/ url]

Space


Antwort von DWUA:

Hello Axel,

Leger is now just as a painter "specialist" for nursing standing movements.
His paintings are large areas covered frozen "Stills," which, if we
they had, they immediately sold for a lot of money because they are
Tranquility radiate from design her look chic, but we do not like.
(To be brief and unscientific way: his film was probably
too much competition)

The DADA "movements" are alien to him.
From a Max Ernst such a statement would never come!

But if you like a painter at work want to watch:
There is - and you know it certainly was an sw Film
"Picasso paints" from the 50ger years?
Directing: A famous name.

To come to our theme:
There is a "touching" scene:
Picasso and tinkers around overpainted agencies, and several times again and again.
Nothing like him.
Until it is too silly:
He says:
This has no purpose anymore!
The camera documents how he überstreicht,
to others with something of scratch.

What there was a Picasso, but we can at any time ...

;)

DWUA

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash