Infoseite // Intel and Nvidia in the dispute: CPU or GPU?



Newsmeldung von slashCAM:


Intel and Nvidia in the dispute: CPU or GPU? Of thomas - 24 Feb 2009 16:29:00
What part of the computer in the future will be the main computational work to do? As before, the CPU, with more and more integrated processor cores? Or, the advanced GPU with a plethora of GPU cores? This question divides Intel and Nvidia, whose future with much of the answer to this question is linked. Der Spiegel article describes this decision in principle quite beautiful, but confused the issue somewhat with the license dispute about chipsets for Intel of Nvidia, which is perhaps more to the lucrative market of the chipset's integrated graphics, as to the future of the central processing unit.

This is an auto-generated entry



Space


Antwort von Commanderjanke:

It will probably be so until the mainstream \ Middle Range area, the processor (CPU) enhanced graphic calculation will prevail.
Reason: Intel may be the motherboard chips as synonymous, the CPU's have the capacity to produce and distribute.

The Gamer \ Highend field will initially enforce Nividia GPU's because they just have enormous computing power of those intel CPU's are still far away.

However, If AMD can not forget about these companies can be fast CPU's as synonymous fast GPU's offer and in this war may soon be the silent winner.

So yes, it is synonymous with the war vs X-Box360. PS3 happen .. who won the Wii really ..

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash