Frage von benny114:
Hi Folks,
I have a JVC / GY-DV 500 that may be offered something like that cost the camera head has 24 hours and is about 3 years old and he has a 14-Cannon Lens recordings are not bad who has experience with such a part
Gruß benny
:)
Antwort von sollinger:
I guess because of the objetkivs one must still determine synonymous charge around 3200-3500 EUR!
Antwort von benny114:
Hi,
if the camera can cost between EUR 3200-3500, she must be fairly and properly? Where such a part is used
Gruß benny
:)
Antwort von sollinger:
Now, that's just a real profit-cam, I would say: very best broadcast images (but only 4:3!), for still rel. low price!
Antwort von benny114:
Hi
But what does that mean only 4-3 so I Nocht do nothing? is meant Pal.
Gruß benny
:)
Antwort von sollinger:
yes sure PAL 4:3! is indeed logically, the camcorder is designed for this resolution, with the corresponding pixels on a 4:3-chip.
if they wanted to turn to 16:9, this would be a serious loss incurred with regard to the selective course, but this topic is already been mentioned here often synonymous, and be read.
Antwort von benny114:
Hi,
Thanks for the info
Gruß benny
:)
Antwort von sollinger:
gern geschehen ;-)
Antwort von prem:
how much did you get offered?
Antwort von PowerMac:
hello benny times have you ever heard of using such sowas satzzeichen einn to text in for so no sau can read fast and even reply on it because the answer would be that you have no idea such a camera, and then nothing brings the price is far below 3000 lation in an old camera anyway so it is now outdated, and that is every day more clearly than hd itself comes when the head hours are small for what you have demanded the head hours are what creates such a camera depp s.and makes five straight years times 24 hours, no one there so I would very skeptical for 3000 you get a hdv camera sony of the synonymous broadcast images of hinkriegt hdv expected to withstand even a pal that sometimes one must digibeta
Gruß Patrick
Antwort von Markus:
hello benny times have you ever heard of something like using satzzeichen einn text in to ... waswärewenndieinterpunktionszeichenunddiespacetastekaputtsinddannkanndasniemandmehrlesen
;-)
Antwort von molch:
notes the fact in jvc dv?
hdv because even offers advantages in terms of the color compression:
pal for you belittling the picture to the half and since at hv dv and indeed every 2nd color line, we sampled and where you downskaling only every 2nd line need, you have virtually uncompressed video.
Give views on uncompressed downskaled hdv and dv.
dv in the colors a bit vague, in uncompressed spent every last detail you can see razor sharp.
that creates - DV -500 not.
Antwort von PowerMac:
notes the fact in jvc dv?
hdv because even offers advantages in terms of the color compression:
pal for you belittling the picture to the half and since at hv dv and indeed every 2nd color line, we sampled and where you downskaling only every 2nd line need, you have virtually uncompressed video.
Give views on uncompressed downskaled hdv and dv.
dv in the colors a bit vague, in uncompressed spent every last detail you can see razor sharp.
that creates - DV -500 not. for this reason take FX1.
For PAL genial work. Well for HDV work.
Antwort von matthew:
but in any case better than ne xl1 (s) ... And honestly, that's a professional camcorder! or what do you think of any good successor (5000, 5100) synonymous nothing? especially since the 500 or so technical limitations, so pretty much, except of course the small lcd monitor .. ;-)
So I am still so happy! and the fx is unfortunately not a shoulder-cam!
And in general, who already requires HD (V)?
Antwort von PowerMac:
The image quality is for PAL already Verstaendnis
But I guess that counted down the FX1 is still upward.
Okay, no shoulder camera, and? Power is not so much from?
Unfortunately, I already need HD. Am on the first HD channels in Germany. You want to make a 10-minute feature? Good, but then with the FX1 ...
Thus, PAL is hostile to us as we already will soon be synonymous to the broadcasters and other regional channels and eventually spill over to the private sector.
From the point of view, I give only to observe whether it is worth it today, a not inconsiderable sum of money to invest in a relatively "old" when with a new one may be better in both SD as synonymous with HD is - at the same price ...
Antwort von Markus:
And in general, who already requires HD (V)? These are some interesting articles in the current issue (6 / 2005) of the journal
Antwort von michel:
have the gydv5000
3000 euro would be used for something much vorgaängermodell.
The cam is virtually the best shoulder camera. processing is naturally somewhat cheap, but the functionality is good and the cam is very popular with many.
Antwort von Jan:
I know the previous DV 500, although not the successors DV 5000 is a completely different league as the consumer models, and compared with the SonyDSR models.
12 bit A / D conversion and 24-bit signal processing is not received at all in the consumer class
Bayonet closure for Lenses
Black / White Viewfinder
800 lines resolution
3 x 1 / 2 "IT" (Not as cheap CCD consumer class) each with 440,000 pixels
Processing of Mini DV, DV and DVCAM
Slow shutter up to 6.25 frames
400% Dynamics with Auto-Knee
Excellent Resolutionvon 5 MHz
Several ND filter installed 1 / 8 and 1 / 64
Shutter speed in small increments of 50.1 to 2067.8 Hz
2 built-in XLR connectors
Change the color matrix, gamma curve, Skin Detail, clipping, black level
etc.
Not for nothing, the camera of documentary filmmakers and industry + Nachrichtenfilmern is used. (Now, probably the DV 5100)
LG
January
