Frage von brendan:
Hello!
in a report (http://auberge-tv.de/GYHD-100/Erfahrungsbericht.html), the JVC Miess as presented.
Did synonymous for my planned areas (News / accidents) importance?
This camera would be better technique to fit my friend, so I then so synonymous times when one or other event could be filmed.
What is the difference, the "big" - "1000EUR" - an advantage over FX1?
I can not stop to assess. Otherwise, I would like to have for 2100 ca ne used FX1 buy, with accessories, I went at around 3000th For this sum, the Prices for ne GY HD only los ...
What do the pros?
CU, Brendan
Antwort von tommyb:
The Camera is really super, but has two disadvantages:
1. The Viewfinder is crap. Sharpness control, you can not (not even in SD). There are only these Focus Assist, a peaking with a green / blue / red line. The works quite well, but his whole life to a green line to leave? Did not have much to do with craft.
2. Lens is good, but the price accordingly (see your link).
BONUS: The original Batteries do not last long. Adapter plate on V-Mount empfehlenswert.
The FX1 has no such sharpness issues may need to run auto. Your lack of XLR Aschnlüsse.
Both cameras also feature on HDV. The JVC does 720p25 (jerky), the FX1 1080i50 (not jerky). In my view, is the JVC rather scenic shooting, while the FX1 more suited for EB.
BONUS: Take it with a Z1, which is identical with the FX1, but has some more features (such as XLR).
Antwort von brendan:
hi tommy, thanks for your reply!
with the focus of control is probably maggoty ..
s.die Z1 thought I already synonymous, synonymous, but it cost almost 3000 eur .. times I write a petition. otherwise the FX1, but I already have 2 offers ...
gruß, Brendan
Antwort von WoWu:
@ Brendan
... as a lump sum (as bad) you can not say. As the article you have just flown over.
It is synonymous clear that the optics of the head is not fair.
It has certainly correct a few problems, especially concerning the Optics.
The camera head is not bad and in the practical use of holding quite well.
The optics can hold only one to Aperture (5.6), a really sharp picture delivers. And s.ein few weak points you have just become accustomed.
So if you have enough time to adjust and have a few ND's good, then it will go.
Only with the dynamic light is nothing in the "fragment" of Optics. But it is just a couple of hundred ¬ Lens synonymous not expect super performance.
Antwort von Login_vergessen:
Brendan, if your friend through so much experience in the shooting of an accident, why can not you ask nicely in terms of "your" Camera advice? He would then surely know what "you" is assumed.
If you are somewhere on the "flat country" living, and your pictures (if there ever anyone interested) the only ones, you may receive the one or the other go. But diving in a metropolitan area is suddenly more of your "variety" with reasonable cameras, it'll once again different. What / Redaktuer r / in you would for a current rotary phone if you have no reasonable O-Tones can take. In recent reports (no preference whether accident or an annual press conference), you can no longer rotate. Everything must immediately agree, otherwise the war's and you're out. If you want to do TV, you should s.den usual technical standards guided DHZ B. pegelbare XLR inputs with phantom power on the audio side, etc.
Anyone can of course be happy to make whatever he wants and what he goes well, these are just a few hints of a TV / EB 'ler ...
Antwort von robbie:
Brendan can not help, he is very sorry to be convinced of what the other thread already proves synonymous.
Antwort von brendan:
Brendan can not help, he is very sorry to be convinced of what the other thread already proves synonymous. wie bitte? I'm just a complete novice in this area, wants on the one side do not spend too much on the other side then do not have the worst.
then adds that the aforementioned well-known even admits no current market overview to have. yes, you can not expect synonymous. this is one of the strength in the forum. he halt ne 8000 EUR JVC and for him it would be good, I had a JVC synonymous. - Out-and hergerissen! - Because obviously the canon XH A1 probably the best alternative for me counts. zZ closer my choice.
gruß
Brendan
Antwort von Johannes:
Hy, with few people of a local broadcaster, I have produced a broadcast times. We had 3 cameras ne my Canon XL2 and Panasonic DVX100A the SonyZ1 which is the Profievariante the FX1 is. With all the cameras in DV 4:3 and rotated and you can see clearly the difference of Panasonic / Canon Sonyz1 for I know not synonymous but it has such a DDRtouch. Once the whole line is I will be times you may link to the video and then you can convince yourself. The best of the 3 cameras I found the sharpness of the colors and the Panasonic!
Antwort von Jogi:
Hy, with few people of a local broadcaster, I have produced a broadcast times. We had 3 cameras ne my Canon XL2 and Panasonic DVX100A the SonyZ1 which is the Profievariante the FX1 is. With all the cameras in DV 4:3 and rotated and you can see clearly the difference of Panasonic / Canon Sonyz1 for I know not synonymous but it has such a DDRtouch. Once the whole line is I will be times you may link to the video and then you can convince yourself. The best of the 3 cameras I found the sharpness of the colors and the Panasonic! It is well known that most of the DV HD / HDV Cams much worse than a good DV Cam. This applies in particular to the FX1/Z1 too. If, however, the HDV material on the Cam downconvertiert so than HDV, DV off looks different. Then comes synonymous Pana DVX100 into a spin. Downconvertiertes HDV to DV - material is simply very good.
