Infoseite // Jerking, so upgrade?



Frage von DezorianGuy:


Hi there,
still have a problem that HD (video; synonymous run after rendering) never liquid, but after few seconds to begin to jerk as if the PC fails to comply with the calculated play /.

My system:
Intel 6400 Dual 2.1 Ghz, 8GB ram, Geforce 8800GT 512MB, 2 Internal HDDs + 5 external USB hard disks (and all defragmented), 22 "TFT, Windows 7 64bit, Adobe Premiere Pro CS4

Should I buy myself a quad system, heard intel i7 920 would have the best preisleistungsverhältnis.
I need a new CPU to be able to work fluidly (; with 1440x1080, 720p clips)?

Space


Antwort von B.DeKid:

Well not really, my workstation is much weaker, and because even run ruckeln play full HD movies at the "without any.

Should therefore lie not s.der hardware.

I only use VLC
My Rams are clean
My Virtual memory allocated to multiple partitions

I've defragmented my disks never ;-)

......................

Mach mal a benchmark test is perhaps one of the Ram Bar Broken


.....................

But as I said to the pure play of HD content smallest systems have enough - even then the Edit brauchts nen bissel more power if you do not want to spend hours in the rendering.

......................

So I think that there is other things s.einem factor!

MfG
B. DeKid

The i7 chip is more energy but at the moment with really less than 250 euro price for a top chip moderately considered.

Space


Antwort von Rolf Hankel:

"DezorianGuy" wrote: Hi there,
still have a problem that HD video synonymous (after rendering) never run smoothly, but after few seconds to begin to jerk as if the PC fails to comply with the calculated play /.

My system:
Intel 6400 Dual 2.1 Ghz, 8GB ram, Geforce 8800GT 512MB, 2 Internal HDDs + 5 external USB hard disks (all defragmented), 22 "TFT, Windows 7 64bit, Adobe Premiere Pro CS4

Should I buy myself a quad system, heard intel i7 920 would have the best preisleistungsverhältnis.
I need a new CPU to be able to work smoothly (with 1440x1080, 720p clips)?


Hello

Try to check with the latest version of Zoom Player

Gruss Rolf ...

Space


Antwort von Axel:

The 720p of Dezo, hello, incidentally, could indeed come from the 1.4 k of the HV20, which he used at least once a NTSC version had. What is it then? 24p, 30p or 25p (maybe a new cam?).

"Dezorian Guy" wrote: (with 1440x1080, 720p clips)

Wat'n nu? Speaks nothing against small scale, but please only for output.

As the monitor is set? There are two monitors (Cut Square)? Both monitors are set the same? Is there a player that is going on smoothly, the footage?

I agree with the others, it is not s.den System values your computer very well but not a component can fit so well. Summary:

> Possibly. Pull cleaned (23.976p from 60i)?
> Monitor frequency (s)?
> Ram, graphics card, check processor utilization.

Space


Antwort von B.DeKid:

Note:

It could be synonymous s.den 5 external disks are where they serve as storage locations.

There is the question of what is synonymous) for panels (speed popular with the external HDD.
How these are connected (not all USB hubs are fast)

......................

And what of us - why 5 External disks instead of a NAS with 4 plates in the network, and only an external disk?

You can have a system synonymous "clutter collect" or "too" ;-)

MfG
B. DeKid

Space


Antwort von carstenkurz:

With two internal and 5 external USB disks ( 'all defragmented') I would lay the blame at the other interpretation of the system erstmal synonymous with the USB disks. The throughput of USB is ridiculous compared with internal access.

Take the USB disks out of their shells and shut the internal or an external eSATA enclosure. Your motherboard is with security still a few SATA ports to have free, little could have been worth a simple SATA RAID controller.

USB is good for backup and transport, but not for work.

- Carsten

Space


Antwort von DezorianGuy:

Erstmal Thanks for quick reply.

So, of playing HD movies (720p, 1080p) actually works more smoothly with Gomplayer, kmplayer, media player classic and vlc player.
Playing Alone in the processing inside of the premiere jerky (adobe player?), That is to edit the last.
Synonymous've already tried a videofile of the internal plate (where installed synonymous premiere) is to edit, but the same stuttering.
Also encode that somehow takes longer than the time (before nem year).
I need an encoding of 1440x1080i 24std ins. H264 720p 14Mbit (zb). + What used about 8 hrs or similar need for ne hour video.

At the same time playing with my Gomplayer premiere ins. H264 mp4 converted video clips from choppy, both by the ton as a synonymous of image format.
Km player and vlc problems ... but no sooner was synonymous not so.
what's going on. I windows7 fresh on my 2nd internal sata disk installed, driver and right after premiere.

I takes up next to my hv20 ntsc synonymous nor ixus I110 720p, so I'm working at the moment. So probably 25fps.
I meant with "(1440x1080, 720p)," only that it generally jerky, with no preference to which output material I work ... sorry for the confusion.

I once ran a benchmark program, 3Dmark vantage, and I was constantly below 10 fps and in some tests even ... 0.2 fps slideshow.
Something is probably wrong.

I installed a hardware benchmark times, we'll see what that says.

PS: What should I consider for NAT?

PS: I have one with USB Hub external power of Belkin, had concluded well in tests. If an external power supply any good or useful?

Space


Antwort von carstenkurz:

What is it to the various internal and external hard disks? With so many external USB disks, one can only assume that you are your video material, raw material and final material, it lagerst and edit. And that is exactly your problem already. Pack ran the plates on internal SATA or external via eSATA, and your problem should be solved. With 5 plates you were allowed to scrape together reasonably synonymous with a usable RAID and then have other advantages.


- Carsten

Space


Antwort von DezorianGuy:

Exactly. I mainly video out and other stuff.
eSata? How do I do something?
Raid, I'm afraid that by the crash of a plate with all the other could be torn to death.

Space



Space


Antwort von carstenkurz:

I do not know how far you have your material distributed to 5 external disks. But suppose it's more wildly scattered by capacity, then you can zersemmeln the failure of one disk synonymous, at least a whole or more projects. With 5 plates you can easily build a fault-tolerant RAID, in which the failure of one disk just no negative consequences.

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID

In the preliminary stage but you can work just synonymous with no RAID. I'm assuming your external USB hard disks have installed all internal SATA disks. All or most of them from their casings rausbauen you should plug it in the calculator s.interne SATA connections. If the calculator does not have enough free ports, there are additional cheap controller cards for expansion. For there are as eSATA controller or adapter cables that adapt the internal SATA connections to eSATA Connections. In addition, you still need external disk enclosure with eSATA connectors. I personally am not a fan of them, by default, to work on external drives, I would connect internal as far as possible all the plates. This is synonymous the cheapest solution. How big are your USB Drives? Sometimes it makes more sense to buy big new 2-4 and connect the internal disks. 1TB disks so do not cost much, and the USB disks You can then use for backups.

In any case, the USB disks being your bottleneck (allemale s.einem stroke), and there can be synonymous not change turn. For sowas USB is simply not suitable.

- Carsten

Space


Antwort von DezorianGuy:

4 plates are one is 500GB and 1000GB.
Maxtor, Seagate and Fujitsu, I think. I've never expanded outside panels from its case, I lose by not synonymous, the warranty ...? : \
That with the raid times ... I have to read through the external use only as a warehouse. The actual video I try to directly edit my 1TB of internal disk.

Of course, I could try the current video files that I edit at the moment of external disks, copy to my internal (about 120gb) ... but, like Premiere, then finds the files again?
Do I assign each individual video file again to find ... I had to make it schonmal, or is there a direct way to maintain the relationship, even if the location of the files is changed?

Thanks in any case for all the suggestions.

Space





slashCAM nutzt Cookies zur Optimierung des Angebots, auch Cookies Dritter. Die Speicherung von Cookies kann in den Browsereinstellungen unterbunden werden. Mehr Informationen erhalten Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Mehr Infos Verstanden!
RSS Suche YouTube Facebook Twitter slashCAM-Slash