Frage von Ramin:
after I AVIumgewandelt the video in Premiere and I look at a player on the calculator, the camera movements are very choppy. Why might that be?
Antwort von Lothar:
: After I AVIumgewandelt the video in Premiere and I am on a player
: Look at the calculator, the camera movements are very choppy. How can the
: Lie?
Hello (; nameless)
I was at this issue if the field order was wrong (; analog camera images, digital camera images). Therefore, one can choose in Adobe Premiere: lower field first or upper field first.
Gruss Lothar
LightForce-IN-freesurf.ch
Antwort von Kiara Borini:
: After I AVIumgewandelt the video in Premiere and I am on a player
: Look at the calculator, the camera movements are very choppy. How can the
: Lie?
Dropped Frames: The calculator was not fast enough and has all the frames "captured". Then they are missing when playing ...
Calculator / graphics card: Possibly. Calculator is not quick enough to prepare the data so that the playback s.Screen liquid appears. I once had a PC that was ages ago with 24-bit color depth problems, display the video smoothly, with 32-bit then it went. So just play around with the Screen Drivers.
Premiere allows for a live output via FireWire. So, if the camera allows the (; DV-IN), expand the LCD of the camera and playing see if the bucking is synonymous to see on the camera. If so s.Capturen, lags, if not s.der combination PC / graphics card / hard drive for playback.
Defragment the hard drive, the graphics card drivers (; color depth, resolution), other graphics card, memory expansion, faster hard drive, faster PC: Possible steps would be. For example, in the order.
Ciao
Kiara
kiarab-AT-gmx.de
Antwort von Kiara Borini:
: After I AVIumgewandelt the video in Premiere
This sentence makes me even more suspicious! "In AVIumgewandelt" - what was it before? Digital does not mean necessarily synonymous DV, although initially most of this ale are considered.
What kind of digital video is eingentlich? Mobile Video, DigiCam, MPEG4 Video, DVD-Camera, JVC MEPG2 derivative? And what has changed Premiere?
Kiara
kiarab-AT-gmx.de
Antwort von Lothar:
Hello (; nameless)
:
: I was at this issue if the field order was wrong (; analog
: Camera shots, digital camera images). Therefore, one can in Adobe Premiere
: Choose: lower field first or upper field first.
:
: Gruss Lothar
Sorry Ramin
have missed your name ...
LightForce-IN-freesurf.ch
Antwort von Ramin:
Hello (; nameless)
:
: I was at this issue if the field order was wrong (; analog
: Camera shots, digital camera images). Therefore, one can in Adobe Premiere
: Choose: lower field first or upper field first.
:
: Gruss Lothar
Thanks Lothar,
However, I have only recorded digitally.
Antwort von Gast:
: Thank you Lothar,
:
: However, I have exclusively digitally recorded.
Yes and? Whatever one may mean, it sounds anyway after a typical incorrect setting of the field order. Thus described as the source video so seems to be OK. At least it reads that way.
Who edited the video s.PC can not help but to deal with the basics. And problems with the wrong field order are, as all readers of this forum know, constantly s.der agenda.
Gruss - Guest
Antwort von Kiara Borini:
: But I think the problem is rather s.einer very different place. The most my
: DV cams the consumer class have a digital stabilizer.
That is until now the most plausible answer!
Kiara
kiarab-AT-gmx.de
Antwort von Michael:
So if it's only because the pan, because that has nothing to do with your PC safe.
Premieres can easily loop through the signal via Firewire s.die DV-CAM to watch it s.TV can. Then, however, often tends image s.PC monitor (and, depending on performance), often to a standstill. So if there are increased (; regardless of whether or not swing, then first make the CAM).
But I believe rather the problem lies s.einer very different place. The most my DV cams the consumer class have a digital stabilizer. If one now makes a slow turn (; synonymous on a tripod), it may happen that means the stabilizer, it is a wobbler and it keeps trying to correct. As a result, you have then in turn always a slight "pulling out" of the images or, more simply, it increased ....
Regards
Michael
:
Hello dear lovers,
: I understand the question quite differently, with a simultaneous output of video in
: Monitor windows and on the camcorder (; alternatively TV) are inevitable
: Stuttering. This is synonymous with 2 gigabytes of memory and 3.6GHz processor is not gone.
: Switching just one `s out and then it works.
:
Dieter
michael_hitzler-AT-hotmail.com
Antwort von Dieter Höfer:
: Exactly.
: If it synonymous visible on the television, I'm going for slow shutter
: The Recording; 1/50tel-so or so.
:
M.
Hello dear lovers,
I understand the issue quite differently, with a simultaneous output of video in the monitor window and on the camcorder (; alternatively TV) there is necessarily stuttering. This is synonymous with 2 gigabytes of memory and 3.6GHz processor is not gone.
Switching works just one `s and then from it.
Dieter
Antwort von Maik:
: Where do you see the jerky pictures, then? On the PC monitor? Or on a
:-Supplied video monitor (; what everyone should have, the serious video editing
: Will do)?
Exactly.
If it is synonymous visible on the television, I'm going for slow shutter
at the Recording;-so 1/50tel or so.
M.
info-AT-maik-freudenberg.net
Antwort von Martin D. Bartsch:
On the PC monitor when I look at the finished film.
That speaks for interlace problems. Check out the material but at times s.Television.
MDBartsch-AT-web.de
Antwort von Ramin:
: Where do you see the jerky pictures, then? On the PC monitor? Or on a
:-Supplied video monitor (; what everyone should have, the serious video editing
: Will do)?
On the PC monitor when I look at the finished film.
:
: But I think the problem is rather s.einer very different place. The most my DV cameras: the consumer class have a digital stabilizer.
No, can I rule it out. I would see these supposed stuttering so synonymous even before processing and this is not the case.
Antwort von Martin D. Bartsch:
: Digi Cam Digital Video-> Premiere Pro> AVI-> jerky images with pans, the
: Is the sequence.
Where do you see the jerky pictures, then? On the PC monitor? Or on a provided video monitor (; what should have everyone who wants to do serious video editing)?
MDBartsch-AT-web.de
Antwort von Ramin:
: Dropped Frames: The calculator was not fast enough and does not have all the frames
"Captured". Then they are missing when playing ...
:
: Calculator / graphics card: Possibly. Calculator is not fast enough to the data so
: Recycle that playback s.Screen appears liquid. I once had
: A PC that was ages ago with 24-bit color depth problems, the video without
: To show, with 32-bit, we went. So even with the screen-Drivers
: Play around.
:
Premiere can output a live-to Firewire. So, if the camera allows the
: (; DV-IN), expand the LCD of the camera while playing and see if the bucking
: Is synonymous to see on the camera. If so s.Capturen, lags, if not s.der
: Combination PC / graphics card / hard drive for playback.
:
: Possible steps would be: Defragment the hard drive, the graphics card drivers
: (; Color depth, resolution), other graphics card, memory expansion, faster hard drive,
: Faster PC. For example, in the order.
:
: Ciao
: Kiara
So, I'm not so deep into the matter and certainly not synonymous Crack, however, is what I know that the calculator is brand new and brings in terms of performance all that he should (; 1024 MB RAM, Pentium 4 3.20 GHz, graphic WinFast PX6600). On the power minimum it should be not so.
Digi Cam Digital Video-> Premiere Pro> AVI-> jerky images with pans, that's the sequence.
Greeting Ramin
